Cargando…

Contrasted Fitness Costs of Docking and Antibacterial Constructs in the EE and EVida3 Strains Validates Two-Phase Anopheles gambiae Genetic Transformation System

The deployment of transgenic mosquitoes carrying genes for refractoriness to malaria has long been seen as a futuristic scenario riddled with technical difficulties. The integration of anti-malarial effector genes and a gene-drive system into the mosquito genome without affecting mosquito fitness is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paton, Doug, Underhill, Anne, Meredith, Janet, Eggleston, Paul, Tripet, Frederic
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3694017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23840679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067364
_version_ 1782274790733643776
author Paton, Doug
Underhill, Anne
Meredith, Janet
Eggleston, Paul
Tripet, Frederic
author_facet Paton, Doug
Underhill, Anne
Meredith, Janet
Eggleston, Paul
Tripet, Frederic
author_sort Paton, Doug
collection PubMed
description The deployment of transgenic mosquitoes carrying genes for refractoriness to malaria has long been seen as a futuristic scenario riddled with technical difficulties. The integration of anti-malarial effector genes and a gene-drive system into the mosquito genome without affecting mosquito fitness is recognized as critical to the success of this malaria control strategy. Here we conducted detailed fitness studies of two Anopheles gambiae s.s. transgenic lines recently developed using a two-phase targeted genetic transformation system. In replicated cage-invasion experiments, males and females of the EE Phase-1 docking strain and EVida3 Phase-2 strain loaded with an antimicrobial peptide (AMP) expressed upon blood-feeding, were mixed with individuals of a recently-colonized strain of the Mopti chromosomal form. The experimental design enabled us to detect initial strain reproductive success differences, assortative mating and hybrid vigor that may characterize mosquito release situations. In addition, the potential fitness costs of the unloaded Phase-1 and loaded Phase-2 genetic constructs, independent of the strains’ original genetic backgrounds, were estimated between the 1(st) instar larvae, pupae and adult stages over 10 generations. The Phase-1 unloaded docking cassette was found to have significantly lower allelic fitness relative to the wild type allele during larval development. However, overall genotypic fitness was comparable to the wild type allele across all stages leading to stable equilibrium in all replicates. In contrast, the Phase-2 construct expressing EVida3 disappeared from all replicates within 10 generations due to lower fitness of hemi- and homozygous larvae, suggesting costly background AMP expression and/or of the DsRed2 marker. This is the first study to effectively partition independent fitness stage-specific determinants in unloaded and loaded transgenic strains of a Phase-1–2 transformation system. Critically, the high fitness of the Phase-1 docking strain makes it the ideal model system for measuring the genetic load of novel candidate anti-malarial molecules in vivo.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3694017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36940172013-07-09 Contrasted Fitness Costs of Docking and Antibacterial Constructs in the EE and EVida3 Strains Validates Two-Phase Anopheles gambiae Genetic Transformation System Paton, Doug Underhill, Anne Meredith, Janet Eggleston, Paul Tripet, Frederic PLoS One Research Article The deployment of transgenic mosquitoes carrying genes for refractoriness to malaria has long been seen as a futuristic scenario riddled with technical difficulties. The integration of anti-malarial effector genes and a gene-drive system into the mosquito genome without affecting mosquito fitness is recognized as critical to the success of this malaria control strategy. Here we conducted detailed fitness studies of two Anopheles gambiae s.s. transgenic lines recently developed using a two-phase targeted genetic transformation system. In replicated cage-invasion experiments, males and females of the EE Phase-1 docking strain and EVida3 Phase-2 strain loaded with an antimicrobial peptide (AMP) expressed upon blood-feeding, were mixed with individuals of a recently-colonized strain of the Mopti chromosomal form. The experimental design enabled us to detect initial strain reproductive success differences, assortative mating and hybrid vigor that may characterize mosquito release situations. In addition, the potential fitness costs of the unloaded Phase-1 and loaded Phase-2 genetic constructs, independent of the strains’ original genetic backgrounds, were estimated between the 1(st) instar larvae, pupae and adult stages over 10 generations. The Phase-1 unloaded docking cassette was found to have significantly lower allelic fitness relative to the wild type allele during larval development. However, overall genotypic fitness was comparable to the wild type allele across all stages leading to stable equilibrium in all replicates. In contrast, the Phase-2 construct expressing EVida3 disappeared from all replicates within 10 generations due to lower fitness of hemi- and homozygous larvae, suggesting costly background AMP expression and/or of the DsRed2 marker. This is the first study to effectively partition independent fitness stage-specific determinants in unloaded and loaded transgenic strains of a Phase-1–2 transformation system. Critically, the high fitness of the Phase-1 docking strain makes it the ideal model system for measuring the genetic load of novel candidate anti-malarial molecules in vivo. Public Library of Science 2013-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3694017/ /pubmed/23840679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067364 Text en © 2013 Paton et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Paton, Doug
Underhill, Anne
Meredith, Janet
Eggleston, Paul
Tripet, Frederic
Contrasted Fitness Costs of Docking and Antibacterial Constructs in the EE and EVida3 Strains Validates Two-Phase Anopheles gambiae Genetic Transformation System
title Contrasted Fitness Costs of Docking and Antibacterial Constructs in the EE and EVida3 Strains Validates Two-Phase Anopheles gambiae Genetic Transformation System
title_full Contrasted Fitness Costs of Docking and Antibacterial Constructs in the EE and EVida3 Strains Validates Two-Phase Anopheles gambiae Genetic Transformation System
title_fullStr Contrasted Fitness Costs of Docking and Antibacterial Constructs in the EE and EVida3 Strains Validates Two-Phase Anopheles gambiae Genetic Transformation System
title_full_unstemmed Contrasted Fitness Costs of Docking and Antibacterial Constructs in the EE and EVida3 Strains Validates Two-Phase Anopheles gambiae Genetic Transformation System
title_short Contrasted Fitness Costs of Docking and Antibacterial Constructs in the EE and EVida3 Strains Validates Two-Phase Anopheles gambiae Genetic Transformation System
title_sort contrasted fitness costs of docking and antibacterial constructs in the ee and evida3 strains validates two-phase anopheles gambiae genetic transformation system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3694017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23840679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067364
work_keys_str_mv AT patondoug contrastedfitnesscostsofdockingandantibacterialconstructsintheeeandevida3strainsvalidatestwophaseanophelesgambiaegenetictransformationsystem
AT underhillanne contrastedfitnesscostsofdockingandantibacterialconstructsintheeeandevida3strainsvalidatestwophaseanophelesgambiaegenetictransformationsystem
AT meredithjanet contrastedfitnesscostsofdockingandantibacterialconstructsintheeeandevida3strainsvalidatestwophaseanophelesgambiaegenetictransformationsystem
AT egglestonpaul contrastedfitnesscostsofdockingandantibacterialconstructsintheeeandevida3strainsvalidatestwophaseanophelesgambiaegenetictransformationsystem
AT tripetfrederic contrastedfitnesscostsofdockingandantibacterialconstructsintheeeandevida3strainsvalidatestwophaseanophelesgambiaegenetictransformationsystem