Cargando…

Trends in Genotypic HIV-1 Antiretroviral Resistance between 2006 and 2012 in South African Patients Receiving First- and Second-Line Antiretroviral Treatment Regimens

OBJECTIVES: South Africa’s national antiretroviral (ARV) treatment program expanded in 2010 to include the nucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors (NRTI) tenofovir (TDF) for adults and abacavir (ABC) for children. We investigated the associated changes in genotypic drug resistance patterns...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Zyl, Gert U., Liu, Tommy F., Claassen, Mathilda, Engelbrecht, Susan, de Oliveira, Tulio, Preiser, Wolfgang, Wood, Natasha T., Travers, Simon, Shafer, Robert W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3694021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23840622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067188
_version_ 1782274791642759168
author Van Zyl, Gert U.
Liu, Tommy F.
Claassen, Mathilda
Engelbrecht, Susan
de Oliveira, Tulio
Preiser, Wolfgang
Wood, Natasha T.
Travers, Simon
Shafer, Robert W.
author_facet Van Zyl, Gert U.
Liu, Tommy F.
Claassen, Mathilda
Engelbrecht, Susan
de Oliveira, Tulio
Preiser, Wolfgang
Wood, Natasha T.
Travers, Simon
Shafer, Robert W.
author_sort Van Zyl, Gert U.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: South Africa’s national antiretroviral (ARV) treatment program expanded in 2010 to include the nucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors (NRTI) tenofovir (TDF) for adults and abacavir (ABC) for children. We investigated the associated changes in genotypic drug resistance patterns in patients with first-line ARV treatment failure since the introduction of these drugs, and protease inhibitor (PI) resistance patterns in patients who received ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r)-containing therapy. METHODS: We analysed ARV treatment histories and HIV-1 RT and protease mutations in plasma samples submitted to the Tygerberg Academic Hospital National Health Service Laboratory. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2012, 1,667 plasma samples from 1,416 ARV-treated patients, including 588 children and infants, were submitted for genotypic resistance testing. Compared with 720 recipients of a d4T or AZT-containing first-line regimen, the 153 recipients of a TDF-containing first-line regimen were more likely to have the RT mutations K65R (46% vs 4.0%; p<0.001), Y115F (10% vs. 0.6%; p<0.001), L74VI (8.5% vs. 1.8%; p<0.001), and K70EGQ (7.8% vs. 0.4%) and recipients of an ABC-containing first-line regimen were more likely to have K65R (17% vs 4.0%; p<0.001), Y115F (30% vs 0.6%; p<0.001), and L74VI (56% vs 1.8%; p<0.001). Among the 490 LPV/r recipients, 55 (11%) had ≥1 LPV-resistance mutations including 45 (9.6%) with intermediate or high-level LPV resistance. Low (20 patients) and intermediate (3 patients) darunavir (DRV) cross resistance was present in 23 (4.6%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients experiencing virological failure on a first-line regimen containing two NRTI plus one NNRTI, the use of TDF in adults and ABC in children was associated with an increase in four major non- thymidine analogue mutations. In a minority of patients, LPV/r-use was associated with intermediate or high-level LPV resistance with predominantly low-level DRV cross-resistance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3694021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36940212013-07-09 Trends in Genotypic HIV-1 Antiretroviral Resistance between 2006 and 2012 in South African Patients Receiving First- and Second-Line Antiretroviral Treatment Regimens Van Zyl, Gert U. Liu, Tommy F. Claassen, Mathilda Engelbrecht, Susan de Oliveira, Tulio Preiser, Wolfgang Wood, Natasha T. Travers, Simon Shafer, Robert W. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: South Africa’s national antiretroviral (ARV) treatment program expanded in 2010 to include the nucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors (NRTI) tenofovir (TDF) for adults and abacavir (ABC) for children. We investigated the associated changes in genotypic drug resistance patterns in patients with first-line ARV treatment failure since the introduction of these drugs, and protease inhibitor (PI) resistance patterns in patients who received ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r)-containing therapy. METHODS: We analysed ARV treatment histories and HIV-1 RT and protease mutations in plasma samples submitted to the Tygerberg Academic Hospital National Health Service Laboratory. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2012, 1,667 plasma samples from 1,416 ARV-treated patients, including 588 children and infants, were submitted for genotypic resistance testing. Compared with 720 recipients of a d4T or AZT-containing first-line regimen, the 153 recipients of a TDF-containing first-line regimen were more likely to have the RT mutations K65R (46% vs 4.0%; p<0.001), Y115F (10% vs. 0.6%; p<0.001), L74VI (8.5% vs. 1.8%; p<0.001), and K70EGQ (7.8% vs. 0.4%) and recipients of an ABC-containing first-line regimen were more likely to have K65R (17% vs 4.0%; p<0.001), Y115F (30% vs 0.6%; p<0.001), and L74VI (56% vs 1.8%; p<0.001). Among the 490 LPV/r recipients, 55 (11%) had ≥1 LPV-resistance mutations including 45 (9.6%) with intermediate or high-level LPV resistance. Low (20 patients) and intermediate (3 patients) darunavir (DRV) cross resistance was present in 23 (4.6%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients experiencing virological failure on a first-line regimen containing two NRTI plus one NNRTI, the use of TDF in adults and ABC in children was associated with an increase in four major non- thymidine analogue mutations. In a minority of patients, LPV/r-use was associated with intermediate or high-level LPV resistance with predominantly low-level DRV cross-resistance. Public Library of Science 2013-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3694021/ /pubmed/23840622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067188 Text en © 2013 Van Zyl et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Van Zyl, Gert U.
Liu, Tommy F.
Claassen, Mathilda
Engelbrecht, Susan
de Oliveira, Tulio
Preiser, Wolfgang
Wood, Natasha T.
Travers, Simon
Shafer, Robert W.
Trends in Genotypic HIV-1 Antiretroviral Resistance between 2006 and 2012 in South African Patients Receiving First- and Second-Line Antiretroviral Treatment Regimens
title Trends in Genotypic HIV-1 Antiretroviral Resistance between 2006 and 2012 in South African Patients Receiving First- and Second-Line Antiretroviral Treatment Regimens
title_full Trends in Genotypic HIV-1 Antiretroviral Resistance between 2006 and 2012 in South African Patients Receiving First- and Second-Line Antiretroviral Treatment Regimens
title_fullStr Trends in Genotypic HIV-1 Antiretroviral Resistance between 2006 and 2012 in South African Patients Receiving First- and Second-Line Antiretroviral Treatment Regimens
title_full_unstemmed Trends in Genotypic HIV-1 Antiretroviral Resistance between 2006 and 2012 in South African Patients Receiving First- and Second-Line Antiretroviral Treatment Regimens
title_short Trends in Genotypic HIV-1 Antiretroviral Resistance between 2006 and 2012 in South African Patients Receiving First- and Second-Line Antiretroviral Treatment Regimens
title_sort trends in genotypic hiv-1 antiretroviral resistance between 2006 and 2012 in south african patients receiving first- and second-line antiretroviral treatment regimens
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3694021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23840622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067188
work_keys_str_mv AT vanzylgertu trendsingenotypichiv1antiretroviralresistancebetween2006and2012insouthafricanpatientsreceivingfirstandsecondlineantiretroviraltreatmentregimens
AT liutommyf trendsingenotypichiv1antiretroviralresistancebetween2006and2012insouthafricanpatientsreceivingfirstandsecondlineantiretroviraltreatmentregimens
AT claassenmathilda trendsingenotypichiv1antiretroviralresistancebetween2006and2012insouthafricanpatientsreceivingfirstandsecondlineantiretroviraltreatmentregimens
AT engelbrechtsusan trendsingenotypichiv1antiretroviralresistancebetween2006and2012insouthafricanpatientsreceivingfirstandsecondlineantiretroviraltreatmentregimens
AT deoliveiratulio trendsingenotypichiv1antiretroviralresistancebetween2006and2012insouthafricanpatientsreceivingfirstandsecondlineantiretroviraltreatmentregimens
AT preiserwolfgang trendsingenotypichiv1antiretroviralresistancebetween2006and2012insouthafricanpatientsreceivingfirstandsecondlineantiretroviraltreatmentregimens
AT woodnatashat trendsingenotypichiv1antiretroviralresistancebetween2006and2012insouthafricanpatientsreceivingfirstandsecondlineantiretroviraltreatmentregimens
AT traverssimon trendsingenotypichiv1antiretroviralresistancebetween2006and2012insouthafricanpatientsreceivingfirstandsecondlineantiretroviraltreatmentregimens
AT shaferrobertw trendsingenotypichiv1antiretroviralresistancebetween2006and2012insouthafricanpatientsreceivingfirstandsecondlineantiretroviraltreatmentregimens