Cargando…

Protozoa Drive the Dynamics of Culturable Biocontrol Bacterial Communities

Some soil bacteria protect plants against soil-borne diseases by producing toxic secondary metabolites. Such beneficial biocontrol bacteria can be used in agricultural systems as alternative to agrochemicals. The broad spectrum toxins responsible for plant protection also inhibit predation by protoz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Müller, Maren Stella, Scheu, Stefan, Jousset, Alexandre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3694078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23840423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066200
_version_ 1782274804938702848
author Müller, Maren Stella
Scheu, Stefan
Jousset, Alexandre
author_facet Müller, Maren Stella
Scheu, Stefan
Jousset, Alexandre
author_sort Müller, Maren Stella
collection PubMed
description Some soil bacteria protect plants against soil-borne diseases by producing toxic secondary metabolites. Such beneficial biocontrol bacteria can be used in agricultural systems as alternative to agrochemicals. The broad spectrum toxins responsible for plant protection also inhibit predation by protozoa and nematodes, the main consumers of bacteria in soil. Therefore, predation pressure may favour biocontrol bacteria and contribute to plant health. We analyzed the effect of Acanthamoeba castellanii on semi-natural soil bacterial communities in a microcosm experiment. We determined the frequency of culturable bacteria carrying genes responsible for the production of the antifungal compounds 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol (DAPG), pyrrolnitrin (PRN) and hydrogen cyanide (HCN) in presence and absence of A. castellanii. We then measured if amoebae affected soil suppressiveness in a bioassay with sugar beet seedlings confronted to the fungal pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Amoebae increased the frequency of both DAPG and HCN positive bacteria in later plant growth phases (2 and 3 weeks), as well as the average number of biocontrol genes per bacterium. The abundance of DAPG positive bacteria correlated with disease suppression, suggesting that their promotion by amoebae may enhance soil health. However, the net effect of amoebae on soil suppressiveness was neutral to slightly negative, possibly because amoebae slow down the establishment of biocontrol bacteria on the recently emerged seedlings used in the assay. The results indicate that microfaunal predators foster biocontrol bacterial communities. Understanding interactions between biocontrol bacteria and their predators may thus help developing environmentally friendly management practices of agricultural systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3694078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36940782013-07-09 Protozoa Drive the Dynamics of Culturable Biocontrol Bacterial Communities Müller, Maren Stella Scheu, Stefan Jousset, Alexandre PLoS One Research Article Some soil bacteria protect plants against soil-borne diseases by producing toxic secondary metabolites. Such beneficial biocontrol bacteria can be used in agricultural systems as alternative to agrochemicals. The broad spectrum toxins responsible for plant protection also inhibit predation by protozoa and nematodes, the main consumers of bacteria in soil. Therefore, predation pressure may favour biocontrol bacteria and contribute to plant health. We analyzed the effect of Acanthamoeba castellanii on semi-natural soil bacterial communities in a microcosm experiment. We determined the frequency of culturable bacteria carrying genes responsible for the production of the antifungal compounds 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol (DAPG), pyrrolnitrin (PRN) and hydrogen cyanide (HCN) in presence and absence of A. castellanii. We then measured if amoebae affected soil suppressiveness in a bioassay with sugar beet seedlings confronted to the fungal pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Amoebae increased the frequency of both DAPG and HCN positive bacteria in later plant growth phases (2 and 3 weeks), as well as the average number of biocontrol genes per bacterium. The abundance of DAPG positive bacteria correlated with disease suppression, suggesting that their promotion by amoebae may enhance soil health. However, the net effect of amoebae on soil suppressiveness was neutral to slightly negative, possibly because amoebae slow down the establishment of biocontrol bacteria on the recently emerged seedlings used in the assay. The results indicate that microfaunal predators foster biocontrol bacterial communities. Understanding interactions between biocontrol bacteria and their predators may thus help developing environmentally friendly management practices of agricultural systems. Public Library of Science 2013-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3694078/ /pubmed/23840423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066200 Text en © 2013 Müller et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Müller, Maren Stella
Scheu, Stefan
Jousset, Alexandre
Protozoa Drive the Dynamics of Culturable Biocontrol Bacterial Communities
title Protozoa Drive the Dynamics of Culturable Biocontrol Bacterial Communities
title_full Protozoa Drive the Dynamics of Culturable Biocontrol Bacterial Communities
title_fullStr Protozoa Drive the Dynamics of Culturable Biocontrol Bacterial Communities
title_full_unstemmed Protozoa Drive the Dynamics of Culturable Biocontrol Bacterial Communities
title_short Protozoa Drive the Dynamics of Culturable Biocontrol Bacterial Communities
title_sort protozoa drive the dynamics of culturable biocontrol bacterial communities
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3694078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23840423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066200
work_keys_str_mv AT mullermarenstella protozoadrivethedynamicsofculturablebiocontrolbacterialcommunities
AT scheustefan protozoadrivethedynamicsofculturablebiocontrolbacterialcommunities
AT joussetalexandre protozoadrivethedynamicsofculturablebiocontrolbacterialcommunities