Cargando…

Comparison of Heterologous Prime-Boost Strategies against Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag Using Negative Stranded RNA Viruses

This study analyzed a heterologous prime-boost vaccine approach against HIV-1 using three different antigenically unrelated negative-stranded viruses (NSV) expressing HIV-1 Gag as vaccine vectors: rabies virus (RABV), vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and Newcastle disease virus (NDV). We hypothesize...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lawrence, Tessa M., Wanjalla, Celestine N., Gomme, Emily A., Wirblich, Christoph, Gatt, Anthony, Carnero, Elena, García-Sastre, Adolfo, Lyles, Douglas S., McGettigan, James P., Schnell, Matthias J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3694142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23840600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067123
_version_ 1782274817490157568
author Lawrence, Tessa M.
Wanjalla, Celestine N.
Gomme, Emily A.
Wirblich, Christoph
Gatt, Anthony
Carnero, Elena
García-Sastre, Adolfo
Lyles, Douglas S.
McGettigan, James P.
Schnell, Matthias J.
author_facet Lawrence, Tessa M.
Wanjalla, Celestine N.
Gomme, Emily A.
Wirblich, Christoph
Gatt, Anthony
Carnero, Elena
García-Sastre, Adolfo
Lyles, Douglas S.
McGettigan, James P.
Schnell, Matthias J.
author_sort Lawrence, Tessa M.
collection PubMed
description This study analyzed a heterologous prime-boost vaccine approach against HIV-1 using three different antigenically unrelated negative-stranded viruses (NSV) expressing HIV-1 Gag as vaccine vectors: rabies virus (RABV), vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and Newcastle disease virus (NDV). We hypothesized that this approach would result in more robust cellular immune responses than those achieved with the use of any of the vaccines alone in a homologous prime-boost regimen. To this end, we primed BALB/c mice with each of the NSV-based vectors. Primed mice were rested for thirty-five days after which we administered a second immunization with the same or heterologous NSV-Gag viruses. The magnitude and quality of the Gag-specific CD8(+) T cells in response to these vectors post boost were measured. In addition, we performed challenge experiments using vaccinia virus expressing HIV-1 Gag (VV-Gag) thirty-three days after the boost inoculation. Our results showed that the choice of the vaccine used for priming was important for the detected Gag-specific CD8(+) T cell recall responses post boost and that NDV-Gag appeared to result in a more robust recall of CD8(+) T cell responses independent of the prime vaccine used. However, the different prime-boost strategies were not distinct for the parameters studied in the challenge experiments using VV-Gag but did indicate some benefits compared to single immunizations. Taken together, our data show that NSV vectors can individually stimulate HIV-Gag specific CD8(+) T cells that are effectively recalled by other NSV vectors in a heterologous prime-boost approach. These results provide evidence that RABV, VSV and NDV can be used in combination to develop vaccines needing prime-boost regimens to stimulate effective immune responses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3694142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36941422013-07-09 Comparison of Heterologous Prime-Boost Strategies against Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag Using Negative Stranded RNA Viruses Lawrence, Tessa M. Wanjalla, Celestine N. Gomme, Emily A. Wirblich, Christoph Gatt, Anthony Carnero, Elena García-Sastre, Adolfo Lyles, Douglas S. McGettigan, James P. Schnell, Matthias J. PLoS One Research Article This study analyzed a heterologous prime-boost vaccine approach against HIV-1 using three different antigenically unrelated negative-stranded viruses (NSV) expressing HIV-1 Gag as vaccine vectors: rabies virus (RABV), vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and Newcastle disease virus (NDV). We hypothesized that this approach would result in more robust cellular immune responses than those achieved with the use of any of the vaccines alone in a homologous prime-boost regimen. To this end, we primed BALB/c mice with each of the NSV-based vectors. Primed mice were rested for thirty-five days after which we administered a second immunization with the same or heterologous NSV-Gag viruses. The magnitude and quality of the Gag-specific CD8(+) T cells in response to these vectors post boost were measured. In addition, we performed challenge experiments using vaccinia virus expressing HIV-1 Gag (VV-Gag) thirty-three days after the boost inoculation. Our results showed that the choice of the vaccine used for priming was important for the detected Gag-specific CD8(+) T cell recall responses post boost and that NDV-Gag appeared to result in a more robust recall of CD8(+) T cell responses independent of the prime vaccine used. However, the different prime-boost strategies were not distinct for the parameters studied in the challenge experiments using VV-Gag but did indicate some benefits compared to single immunizations. Taken together, our data show that NSV vectors can individually stimulate HIV-Gag specific CD8(+) T cells that are effectively recalled by other NSV vectors in a heterologous prime-boost approach. These results provide evidence that RABV, VSV and NDV can be used in combination to develop vaccines needing prime-boost regimens to stimulate effective immune responses. Public Library of Science 2013-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3694142/ /pubmed/23840600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067123 Text en © 2013 Lawrence et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lawrence, Tessa M.
Wanjalla, Celestine N.
Gomme, Emily A.
Wirblich, Christoph
Gatt, Anthony
Carnero, Elena
García-Sastre, Adolfo
Lyles, Douglas S.
McGettigan, James P.
Schnell, Matthias J.
Comparison of Heterologous Prime-Boost Strategies against Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag Using Negative Stranded RNA Viruses
title Comparison of Heterologous Prime-Boost Strategies against Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag Using Negative Stranded RNA Viruses
title_full Comparison of Heterologous Prime-Boost Strategies against Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag Using Negative Stranded RNA Viruses
title_fullStr Comparison of Heterologous Prime-Boost Strategies against Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag Using Negative Stranded RNA Viruses
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Heterologous Prime-Boost Strategies against Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag Using Negative Stranded RNA Viruses
title_short Comparison of Heterologous Prime-Boost Strategies against Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag Using Negative Stranded RNA Viruses
title_sort comparison of heterologous prime-boost strategies against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gag using negative stranded rna viruses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3694142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23840600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067123
work_keys_str_mv AT lawrencetessam comparisonofheterologousprimebooststrategiesagainsthumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1gagusingnegativestrandedrnaviruses
AT wanjallacelestinen comparisonofheterologousprimebooststrategiesagainsthumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1gagusingnegativestrandedrnaviruses
AT gommeemilya comparisonofheterologousprimebooststrategiesagainsthumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1gagusingnegativestrandedrnaviruses
AT wirblichchristoph comparisonofheterologousprimebooststrategiesagainsthumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1gagusingnegativestrandedrnaviruses
AT gattanthony comparisonofheterologousprimebooststrategiesagainsthumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1gagusingnegativestrandedrnaviruses
AT carneroelena comparisonofheterologousprimebooststrategiesagainsthumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1gagusingnegativestrandedrnaviruses
AT garciasastreadolfo comparisonofheterologousprimebooststrategiesagainsthumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1gagusingnegativestrandedrnaviruses
AT lylesdouglass comparisonofheterologousprimebooststrategiesagainsthumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1gagusingnegativestrandedrnaviruses
AT mcgettiganjamesp comparisonofheterologousprimebooststrategiesagainsthumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1gagusingnegativestrandedrnaviruses
AT schnellmatthiasj comparisonofheterologousprimebooststrategiesagainsthumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1gagusingnegativestrandedrnaviruses