Cargando…

Alveolar bone thickness and lower incisor position in skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate lower incisor position and bony support between patients with Class II average- and high-angle malocclusions and compare with the patients presenting Class I malocclusions. METHODS: CBCT records of 79 patients were divided into 2 groups according to sagittal jaw relationships:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baysal, Asli, Ucar, Faruk Izzet, Buyuk, Suleyman Kutalmis, Ozer, Torun, Uysal, Tancan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Association of Orthodontists 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3694205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23814708
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2013.43.3.134
_version_ 1782274829281394688
author Baysal, Asli
Ucar, Faruk Izzet
Buyuk, Suleyman Kutalmis
Ozer, Torun
Uysal, Tancan
author_facet Baysal, Asli
Ucar, Faruk Izzet
Buyuk, Suleyman Kutalmis
Ozer, Torun
Uysal, Tancan
author_sort Baysal, Asli
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate lower incisor position and bony support between patients with Class II average- and high-angle malocclusions and compare with the patients presenting Class I malocclusions. METHODS: CBCT records of 79 patients were divided into 2 groups according to sagittal jaw relationships: Class I and II. Each group was further divided into average- and high-angle subgroups. Six angular and 6 linear measurements were performed. Independent samples t-test, Kruskal-Wallis, and Dunn post-hoc tests were performed for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: Labial alveolar bone thickness was significantly higher in Class I group compared to Class II group (p = 0.003). Lingual alveolar bone angle (p = 0.004), lower incisor protrusion (p = 0.007) and proclination (p = 0.046) were greatest in Class II average-angle patients. Spongious bone was thinner (p = 0.016) and root apex was closer to the labial cortex in high-angle subgroups when compared to the Class II average-angle subgroup (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Mandibular anterior bony support and lower incisor position were different between average- and high-angle Class II patients. Clinicians should be aware that the range of lower incisor movement in high-angle Class II patients is limited compared to average- angle Class II patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3694205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Korean Association of Orthodontists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36942052013-06-28 Alveolar bone thickness and lower incisor position in skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography Baysal, Asli Ucar, Faruk Izzet Buyuk, Suleyman Kutalmis Ozer, Torun Uysal, Tancan Korean J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate lower incisor position and bony support between patients with Class II average- and high-angle malocclusions and compare with the patients presenting Class I malocclusions. METHODS: CBCT records of 79 patients were divided into 2 groups according to sagittal jaw relationships: Class I and II. Each group was further divided into average- and high-angle subgroups. Six angular and 6 linear measurements were performed. Independent samples t-test, Kruskal-Wallis, and Dunn post-hoc tests were performed for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: Labial alveolar bone thickness was significantly higher in Class I group compared to Class II group (p = 0.003). Lingual alveolar bone angle (p = 0.004), lower incisor protrusion (p = 0.007) and proclination (p = 0.046) were greatest in Class II average-angle patients. Spongious bone was thinner (p = 0.016) and root apex was closer to the labial cortex in high-angle subgroups when compared to the Class II average-angle subgroup (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Mandibular anterior bony support and lower incisor position were different between average- and high-angle Class II patients. Clinicians should be aware that the range of lower incisor movement in high-angle Class II patients is limited compared to average- angle Class II patients. Korean Association of Orthodontists 2013-06 2013-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3694205/ /pubmed/23814708 http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2013.43.3.134 Text en © 2013 The Korean Association of Orthodontists. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Baysal, Asli
Ucar, Faruk Izzet
Buyuk, Suleyman Kutalmis
Ozer, Torun
Uysal, Tancan
Alveolar bone thickness and lower incisor position in skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography
title Alveolar bone thickness and lower incisor position in skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography
title_full Alveolar bone thickness and lower incisor position in skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography
title_fullStr Alveolar bone thickness and lower incisor position in skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Alveolar bone thickness and lower incisor position in skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography
title_short Alveolar bone thickness and lower incisor position in skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography
title_sort alveolar bone thickness and lower incisor position in skeletal class i and class ii malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3694205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23814708
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2013.43.3.134
work_keys_str_mv AT baysalasli alveolarbonethicknessandlowerincisorpositioninskeletalclassiandclassiimalocclusionsassessedwithconebeamcomputedtomography
AT ucarfarukizzet alveolarbonethicknessandlowerincisorpositioninskeletalclassiandclassiimalocclusionsassessedwithconebeamcomputedtomography
AT buyuksuleymankutalmis alveolarbonethicknessandlowerincisorpositioninskeletalclassiandclassiimalocclusionsassessedwithconebeamcomputedtomography
AT ozertorun alveolarbonethicknessandlowerincisorpositioninskeletalclassiandclassiimalocclusionsassessedwithconebeamcomputedtomography
AT uysaltancan alveolarbonethicknessandlowerincisorpositioninskeletalclassiandclassiimalocclusionsassessedwithconebeamcomputedtomography