Cargando…

Comparison between the Repression Potency of siRNA Targeting the Coding Region and the 3′-Untranslated Region of mRNA

Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are applied for post-transcriptional gene silencing by binding target mRNA. A target coding region is usually chosen, although the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) can also be a target. This study elucidates whether the coding region or 3′-UTR elicits higher repression...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lai, Ching-Fang, Chen, Chih-Ying, Au, Lo-Chun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3694366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23841081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/637850
_version_ 1782274850202583040
author Lai, Ching-Fang
Chen, Chih-Ying
Au, Lo-Chun
author_facet Lai, Ching-Fang
Chen, Chih-Ying
Au, Lo-Chun
author_sort Lai, Ching-Fang
collection PubMed
description Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are applied for post-transcriptional gene silencing by binding target mRNA. A target coding region is usually chosen, although the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) can also be a target. This study elucidates whether the coding region or 3′-UTR elicits higher repression. pFLuc and pRLuc are two reporter plasmids. A segment of FLuc gene was PCR-amplified and inserted behind the stop codon of the RLuc gene of the pRLuc. Similarly, a segment of RLuc gene was inserted behind the stop codon of FLuc. Two siFLuc and two siRLuc were siRNAs designed to target the central portions of these segments. Therefore, the siRNA encountered the same targets and flanking sequences. Results showed that the two siFLuc elicited higher repression when the FLuc segment resided in the coding region. Conversely, the two siRLuc showed higher repression when the RLuc segment was in the 3′-UTR. These results indicate that both the coding region and the 3′-UTR can be more effective targets. The thermodynamic stability of the secondary structures was analyzed. The siRNA elicited higher repression in the coding region when the target configuration was stable, and needed to be solved by translation. A siRNA may otherwise favor the target at 3′-UTR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3694366
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36943662013-07-09 Comparison between the Repression Potency of siRNA Targeting the Coding Region and the 3′-Untranslated Region of mRNA Lai, Ching-Fang Chen, Chih-Ying Au, Lo-Chun Biomed Res Int Research Article Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are applied for post-transcriptional gene silencing by binding target mRNA. A target coding region is usually chosen, although the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) can also be a target. This study elucidates whether the coding region or 3′-UTR elicits higher repression. pFLuc and pRLuc are two reporter plasmids. A segment of FLuc gene was PCR-amplified and inserted behind the stop codon of the RLuc gene of the pRLuc. Similarly, a segment of RLuc gene was inserted behind the stop codon of FLuc. Two siFLuc and two siRLuc were siRNAs designed to target the central portions of these segments. Therefore, the siRNA encountered the same targets and flanking sequences. Results showed that the two siFLuc elicited higher repression when the FLuc segment resided in the coding region. Conversely, the two siRLuc showed higher repression when the RLuc segment was in the 3′-UTR. These results indicate that both the coding region and the 3′-UTR can be more effective targets. The thermodynamic stability of the secondary structures was analyzed. The siRNA elicited higher repression in the coding region when the target configuration was stable, and needed to be solved by translation. A siRNA may otherwise favor the target at 3′-UTR. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3694366/ /pubmed/23841081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/637850 Text en Copyright © 2013 Ching-Fang Lai et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lai, Ching-Fang
Chen, Chih-Ying
Au, Lo-Chun
Comparison between the Repression Potency of siRNA Targeting the Coding Region and the 3′-Untranslated Region of mRNA
title Comparison between the Repression Potency of siRNA Targeting the Coding Region and the 3′-Untranslated Region of mRNA
title_full Comparison between the Repression Potency of siRNA Targeting the Coding Region and the 3′-Untranslated Region of mRNA
title_fullStr Comparison between the Repression Potency of siRNA Targeting the Coding Region and the 3′-Untranslated Region of mRNA
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between the Repression Potency of siRNA Targeting the Coding Region and the 3′-Untranslated Region of mRNA
title_short Comparison between the Repression Potency of siRNA Targeting the Coding Region and the 3′-Untranslated Region of mRNA
title_sort comparison between the repression potency of sirna targeting the coding region and the 3′-untranslated region of mrna
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3694366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23841081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/637850
work_keys_str_mv AT laichingfang comparisonbetweentherepressionpotencyofsirnatargetingthecodingregionandthe3untranslatedregionofmrna
AT chenchihying comparisonbetweentherepressionpotencyofsirnatargetingthecodingregionandthe3untranslatedregionofmrna
AT aulochun comparisonbetweentherepressionpotencyofsirnatargetingthecodingregionandthe3untranslatedregionofmrna