Cargando…
Best Available Evidence in Cochrane Reviews on Herbal Medicine?
Cochrane reviews are considered by many to be the “gold standard” or the final word in medical conversation on a topic. We explored the eleven most relevant Cochrane reviews on herbal medicine and identified that frequently herbal medicines in the included studies had not been sufficiently well char...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3694389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23840246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/163412 |
_version_ | 1782274855047004160 |
---|---|
author | Davidson, Elyad Vlachojannis, Julia Cameron, Melainie Chrubasik, Sigrun |
author_facet | Davidson, Elyad Vlachojannis, Julia Cameron, Melainie Chrubasik, Sigrun |
author_sort | Davidson, Elyad |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cochrane reviews are considered by many to be the “gold standard” or the final word in medical conversation on a topic. We explored the eleven most relevant Cochrane reviews on herbal medicine and identified that frequently herbal medicines in the included studies had not been sufficiently well characterised. If data on the effects of the plant parts are unavailable, effects of co-active ingredients need to be considered and the plausibility of the study medications for the specific indications discussed. Effect sizes calculated from exploratory studies would be best used to determine the sample sizes required for future confirmatory studies, rather than as definitive reports of intervention effects. Reviews should be comprehensive, including discussion of putative adverse events and possible drug interactions. We suggest that the guidelines for preparing Cochrane reviews be revised and offer assistance in this task. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3694389 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36943892013-07-09 Best Available Evidence in Cochrane Reviews on Herbal Medicine? Davidson, Elyad Vlachojannis, Julia Cameron, Melainie Chrubasik, Sigrun Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Review Article Cochrane reviews are considered by many to be the “gold standard” or the final word in medical conversation on a topic. We explored the eleven most relevant Cochrane reviews on herbal medicine and identified that frequently herbal medicines in the included studies had not been sufficiently well characterised. If data on the effects of the plant parts are unavailable, effects of co-active ingredients need to be considered and the plausibility of the study medications for the specific indications discussed. Effect sizes calculated from exploratory studies would be best used to determine the sample sizes required for future confirmatory studies, rather than as definitive reports of intervention effects. Reviews should be comprehensive, including discussion of putative adverse events and possible drug interactions. We suggest that the guidelines for preparing Cochrane reviews be revised and offer assistance in this task. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3694389/ /pubmed/23840246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/163412 Text en Copyright © 2013 Elyad Davidson et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Davidson, Elyad Vlachojannis, Julia Cameron, Melainie Chrubasik, Sigrun Best Available Evidence in Cochrane Reviews on Herbal Medicine? |
title | Best Available Evidence in Cochrane Reviews on Herbal Medicine? |
title_full | Best Available Evidence in Cochrane Reviews on Herbal Medicine? |
title_fullStr | Best Available Evidence in Cochrane Reviews on Herbal Medicine? |
title_full_unstemmed | Best Available Evidence in Cochrane Reviews on Herbal Medicine? |
title_short | Best Available Evidence in Cochrane Reviews on Herbal Medicine? |
title_sort | best available evidence in cochrane reviews on herbal medicine? |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3694389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23840246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/163412 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davidsonelyad bestavailableevidenceincochranereviewsonherbalmedicine AT vlachojannisjulia bestavailableevidenceincochranereviewsonherbalmedicine AT cameronmelainie bestavailableevidenceincochranereviewsonherbalmedicine AT chrubasiksigrun bestavailableevidenceincochranereviewsonherbalmedicine |