Cargando…

The EndoPredict Gene-Expression Assay in Clinical Practice - Performance and Impact on Clinical Decisions

The validated EndoPredict assay is a novel tool to predict the risk of metastases of patients with estrogen receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy alone. It has been designed to integrate genomic and clinical information and includes clinico-pathological factor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Müller, Berit Maria, Keil, Elke, Lehmann, Annika, Winzer, Klaus-Jürgen, Richter-Ehrenstein, Christiane, Prinzler, Judith, Bangemann, Nikola, Reles, Angela, Stadie, Sylvia, Schoenegg, Winfried, Eucker, Jan, Schmidt, Marcus, Lippek, Frank, Jöhrens, Korinna, Pahl, Stefan, Sinn, Bruno Valentin, Budczies, Jan, Dietel, Manfred, Denkert, Carsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3694878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23826382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068252
_version_ 1782274906441908224
author Müller, Berit Maria
Keil, Elke
Lehmann, Annika
Winzer, Klaus-Jürgen
Richter-Ehrenstein, Christiane
Prinzler, Judith
Bangemann, Nikola
Reles, Angela
Stadie, Sylvia
Schoenegg, Winfried
Eucker, Jan
Schmidt, Marcus
Lippek, Frank
Jöhrens, Korinna
Pahl, Stefan
Sinn, Bruno Valentin
Budczies, Jan
Dietel, Manfred
Denkert, Carsten
author_facet Müller, Berit Maria
Keil, Elke
Lehmann, Annika
Winzer, Klaus-Jürgen
Richter-Ehrenstein, Christiane
Prinzler, Judith
Bangemann, Nikola
Reles, Angela
Stadie, Sylvia
Schoenegg, Winfried
Eucker, Jan
Schmidt, Marcus
Lippek, Frank
Jöhrens, Korinna
Pahl, Stefan
Sinn, Bruno Valentin
Budczies, Jan
Dietel, Manfred
Denkert, Carsten
author_sort Müller, Berit Maria
collection PubMed
description The validated EndoPredict assay is a novel tool to predict the risk of metastases of patients with estrogen receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy alone. It has been designed to integrate genomic and clinical information and includes clinico-pathological factors such as tumor size and nodal status. The test is feasible in a decentral setting in molecular pathology laboratories. In this project, we investigated the performance of this test in clinical practice, and performed a retrospective evaluation of its impact on treatment decisions in breast cancer. During one year, EndoPredict assays from 167 patients could be successfully performed. For retrospective evaluation of treatment decisions, a questionnaire was sent to the clinical partner. Regarding the molecular EP class, samples from 56 patients (33.5%) had a low-risk, whereas 111 patients (66.5%) showed a high-risk gene profile. After integration of the clinicopathological factors the combined clinical and molecular score (EPclin) resulted in a low-risk group of 77 patients (46.4%), while 89 (53.6%) had a high risk EPclin score. The EPclin-based estimated median 10-year-risk for metastases with endocrine therapy alone was 11% for the whole cohort. The median handling time averaged three days (range: 0 to 11 days), 59.3% of the tests could be performed in three or less than three days. Comparison of pre- and post-test therapy decisions showed a change of therapy in 37.7% of patients. 16 patients (12.3%) had a change to an additional chemotherapy while 25.4% of patients (n = 33) changed to an endocrine therapy alone. In 73 patients (56.2%) no change of therapy resulted. In 6.1% of patients (n = 8), the patients did not agree to the recommendation of the tumor board. Our results show that the EndoPredict assay could be routinely performed in decentral molecular pathology laboratories and the results markedly change treatment decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3694878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36948782013-07-03 The EndoPredict Gene-Expression Assay in Clinical Practice - Performance and Impact on Clinical Decisions Müller, Berit Maria Keil, Elke Lehmann, Annika Winzer, Klaus-Jürgen Richter-Ehrenstein, Christiane Prinzler, Judith Bangemann, Nikola Reles, Angela Stadie, Sylvia Schoenegg, Winfried Eucker, Jan Schmidt, Marcus Lippek, Frank Jöhrens, Korinna Pahl, Stefan Sinn, Bruno Valentin Budczies, Jan Dietel, Manfred Denkert, Carsten PLoS One Research Article The validated EndoPredict assay is a novel tool to predict the risk of metastases of patients with estrogen receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy alone. It has been designed to integrate genomic and clinical information and includes clinico-pathological factors such as tumor size and nodal status. The test is feasible in a decentral setting in molecular pathology laboratories. In this project, we investigated the performance of this test in clinical practice, and performed a retrospective evaluation of its impact on treatment decisions in breast cancer. During one year, EndoPredict assays from 167 patients could be successfully performed. For retrospective evaluation of treatment decisions, a questionnaire was sent to the clinical partner. Regarding the molecular EP class, samples from 56 patients (33.5%) had a low-risk, whereas 111 patients (66.5%) showed a high-risk gene profile. After integration of the clinicopathological factors the combined clinical and molecular score (EPclin) resulted in a low-risk group of 77 patients (46.4%), while 89 (53.6%) had a high risk EPclin score. The EPclin-based estimated median 10-year-risk for metastases with endocrine therapy alone was 11% for the whole cohort. The median handling time averaged three days (range: 0 to 11 days), 59.3% of the tests could be performed in three or less than three days. Comparison of pre- and post-test therapy decisions showed a change of therapy in 37.7% of patients. 16 patients (12.3%) had a change to an additional chemotherapy while 25.4% of patients (n = 33) changed to an endocrine therapy alone. In 73 patients (56.2%) no change of therapy resulted. In 6.1% of patients (n = 8), the patients did not agree to the recommendation of the tumor board. Our results show that the EndoPredict assay could be routinely performed in decentral molecular pathology laboratories and the results markedly change treatment decisions. Public Library of Science 2013-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3694878/ /pubmed/23826382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068252 Text en © 2013 Müller et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Müller, Berit Maria
Keil, Elke
Lehmann, Annika
Winzer, Klaus-Jürgen
Richter-Ehrenstein, Christiane
Prinzler, Judith
Bangemann, Nikola
Reles, Angela
Stadie, Sylvia
Schoenegg, Winfried
Eucker, Jan
Schmidt, Marcus
Lippek, Frank
Jöhrens, Korinna
Pahl, Stefan
Sinn, Bruno Valentin
Budczies, Jan
Dietel, Manfred
Denkert, Carsten
The EndoPredict Gene-Expression Assay in Clinical Practice - Performance and Impact on Clinical Decisions
title The EndoPredict Gene-Expression Assay in Clinical Practice - Performance and Impact on Clinical Decisions
title_full The EndoPredict Gene-Expression Assay in Clinical Practice - Performance and Impact on Clinical Decisions
title_fullStr The EndoPredict Gene-Expression Assay in Clinical Practice - Performance and Impact on Clinical Decisions
title_full_unstemmed The EndoPredict Gene-Expression Assay in Clinical Practice - Performance and Impact on Clinical Decisions
title_short The EndoPredict Gene-Expression Assay in Clinical Practice - Performance and Impact on Clinical Decisions
title_sort endopredict gene-expression assay in clinical practice - performance and impact on clinical decisions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3694878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23826382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068252
work_keys_str_mv AT mullerberitmaria theendopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT keilelke theendopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT lehmannannika theendopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT winzerklausjurgen theendopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT richterehrensteinchristiane theendopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT prinzlerjudith theendopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT bangemannnikola theendopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT relesangela theendopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT stadiesylvia theendopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT schoeneggwinfried theendopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT euckerjan theendopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT schmidtmarcus theendopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT lippekfrank theendopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT johrenskorinna theendopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT pahlstefan theendopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT sinnbrunovalentin theendopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT budcziesjan theendopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT dietelmanfred theendopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT denkertcarsten theendopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT mullerberitmaria endopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT keilelke endopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT lehmannannika endopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT winzerklausjurgen endopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT richterehrensteinchristiane endopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT prinzlerjudith endopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT bangemannnikola endopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT relesangela endopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT stadiesylvia endopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT schoeneggwinfried endopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT euckerjan endopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT schmidtmarcus endopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT lippekfrank endopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT johrenskorinna endopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT pahlstefan endopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT sinnbrunovalentin endopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT budcziesjan endopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT dietelmanfred endopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions
AT denkertcarsten endopredictgeneexpressionassayinclinicalpracticeperformanceandimpactonclinicaldecisions