Cargando…

The impact of flattening-filter-free beam technology on 3D conformal RT

BACKGROUND: The removal of the flattening filter (FF) leads to non-uniform fluence distribution with a considerable increase in dose rate. It is possible to adapt FFF beams (flattening-filter-free) in 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D CRT) by using field in field techniques (FiF). The aim of this r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kretschmer, Matthias, Sabatino, Marcello, Blechschmidt, Arne, Heyden, Sebastian, Grünberg, Bernd, Würschmidt, Florian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3695843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23725479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-133
_version_ 1782275018211721216
author Kretschmer, Matthias
Sabatino, Marcello
Blechschmidt, Arne
Heyden, Sebastian
Grünberg, Bernd
Würschmidt, Florian
author_facet Kretschmer, Matthias
Sabatino, Marcello
Blechschmidt, Arne
Heyden, Sebastian
Grünberg, Bernd
Würschmidt, Florian
author_sort Kretschmer, Matthias
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The removal of the flattening filter (FF) leads to non-uniform fluence distribution with a considerable increase in dose rate. It is possible to adapt FFF beams (flattening-filter-free) in 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D CRT) by using field in field techniques (FiF). The aim of this retrospective study is to clarify whether the quality of 3D CRT plans is influenced by the use of FFF beams. METHOD: This study includes a total of 52 CT studies of RT locations that occur frequently in clinical practice. Dose volume targets were provided for the PTV of breast (n=13), neurocranium (n=11), lung (n=7), bone metastasis (n=10) and prostate (n=11) in line with ICRU report 50/62. 3D CRT planning was carried out using FiF methods. Two clinically utilized photon energies are used for a Siemens ARTISTE linear accelerator in FFF mode at 7MV(FFF) and 11MV(FFF) as well as in FF mode at 6MV(FF) and 10MV(FF). The plan quality in relation to the PTV coverage, OAR (organs at risk) and low dose burden as well as the 2D dosimetric verification is compared with FF plans. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between FFF and FF plans in the mean dose for the PTV of breast, lung, spine metastasis and prostate. The low dose parameters V5Gy and V10Gy display significant differences for FFF and FF plans in some subgroups. The DVH analysis of the OAR revealed some significant differences. Significantly more fields (1.9 – 4.5) were necessary in the use of FFF beams for each location (p<0.0001) in order to achieve PTV coverage. All the tested groups displayed significant increases (1.3 – 2.2 times) in the average number of necessary MU with the use of FFF beams (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that the exclusive use of a linear accelerator in FFF mode is feasible in 3D CRT. It was possible to realize RT plans in comparable quality in typical cases of clinical radiotherapy. The 2D dosimetric validation of the modulated fields verified the dose calculation and thus the correct reproduction of the characteristic FFF parameters in the planning system that was used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3695843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36958432013-06-29 The impact of flattening-filter-free beam technology on 3D conformal RT Kretschmer, Matthias Sabatino, Marcello Blechschmidt, Arne Heyden, Sebastian Grünberg, Bernd Würschmidt, Florian Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The removal of the flattening filter (FF) leads to non-uniform fluence distribution with a considerable increase in dose rate. It is possible to adapt FFF beams (flattening-filter-free) in 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D CRT) by using field in field techniques (FiF). The aim of this retrospective study is to clarify whether the quality of 3D CRT plans is influenced by the use of FFF beams. METHOD: This study includes a total of 52 CT studies of RT locations that occur frequently in clinical practice. Dose volume targets were provided for the PTV of breast (n=13), neurocranium (n=11), lung (n=7), bone metastasis (n=10) and prostate (n=11) in line with ICRU report 50/62. 3D CRT planning was carried out using FiF methods. Two clinically utilized photon energies are used for a Siemens ARTISTE linear accelerator in FFF mode at 7MV(FFF) and 11MV(FFF) as well as in FF mode at 6MV(FF) and 10MV(FF). The plan quality in relation to the PTV coverage, OAR (organs at risk) and low dose burden as well as the 2D dosimetric verification is compared with FF plans. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between FFF and FF plans in the mean dose for the PTV of breast, lung, spine metastasis and prostate. The low dose parameters V5Gy and V10Gy display significant differences for FFF and FF plans in some subgroups. The DVH analysis of the OAR revealed some significant differences. Significantly more fields (1.9 – 4.5) were necessary in the use of FFF beams for each location (p<0.0001) in order to achieve PTV coverage. All the tested groups displayed significant increases (1.3 – 2.2 times) in the average number of necessary MU with the use of FFF beams (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that the exclusive use of a linear accelerator in FFF mode is feasible in 3D CRT. It was possible to realize RT plans in comparable quality in typical cases of clinical radiotherapy. The 2D dosimetric validation of the modulated fields verified the dose calculation and thus the correct reproduction of the characteristic FFF parameters in the planning system that was used. BioMed Central 2013-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3695843/ /pubmed/23725479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-133 Text en Copyright © 2013 Kretschmer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kretschmer, Matthias
Sabatino, Marcello
Blechschmidt, Arne
Heyden, Sebastian
Grünberg, Bernd
Würschmidt, Florian
The impact of flattening-filter-free beam technology on 3D conformal RT
title The impact of flattening-filter-free beam technology on 3D conformal RT
title_full The impact of flattening-filter-free beam technology on 3D conformal RT
title_fullStr The impact of flattening-filter-free beam technology on 3D conformal RT
title_full_unstemmed The impact of flattening-filter-free beam technology on 3D conformal RT
title_short The impact of flattening-filter-free beam technology on 3D conformal RT
title_sort impact of flattening-filter-free beam technology on 3d conformal rt
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3695843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23725479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-133
work_keys_str_mv AT kretschmermatthias theimpactofflatteningfilterfreebeamtechnologyon3dconformalrt
AT sabatinomarcello theimpactofflatteningfilterfreebeamtechnologyon3dconformalrt
AT blechschmidtarne theimpactofflatteningfilterfreebeamtechnologyon3dconformalrt
AT heydensebastian theimpactofflatteningfilterfreebeamtechnologyon3dconformalrt
AT grunbergbernd theimpactofflatteningfilterfreebeamtechnologyon3dconformalrt
AT wurschmidtflorian theimpactofflatteningfilterfreebeamtechnologyon3dconformalrt
AT kretschmermatthias impactofflatteningfilterfreebeamtechnologyon3dconformalrt
AT sabatinomarcello impactofflatteningfilterfreebeamtechnologyon3dconformalrt
AT blechschmidtarne impactofflatteningfilterfreebeamtechnologyon3dconformalrt
AT heydensebastian impactofflatteningfilterfreebeamtechnologyon3dconformalrt
AT grunbergbernd impactofflatteningfilterfreebeamtechnologyon3dconformalrt
AT wurschmidtflorian impactofflatteningfilterfreebeamtechnologyon3dconformalrt