Cargando…

To divide or not to divide: revisiting liver regeneration

The liver has a remarkable capacity to regenerate. Even with surgical removal (partial hepatectomy) of 70% of liver mass, the remnant tissue grows to recover the original mass and functions. Liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy has been studied extensively since the 19th century, establishin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miyaoka, Yuichiro, Miyajima, Atsushi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3695844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23786799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-1028-8-8
_version_ 1782275018440310784
author Miyaoka, Yuichiro
Miyajima, Atsushi
author_facet Miyaoka, Yuichiro
Miyajima, Atsushi
author_sort Miyaoka, Yuichiro
collection PubMed
description The liver has a remarkable capacity to regenerate. Even with surgical removal (partial hepatectomy) of 70% of liver mass, the remnant tissue grows to recover the original mass and functions. Liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy has been studied extensively since the 19th century, establishing the long-standing model that hepatocytes, which account for most of the liver weight, proliferate to recover the original mass of the liver. The basis of this model is the fact that almost all hepatocytes undergo S phase, as shown by the incorporation of radioactive nucleotides during liver regeneration. However, DNA replication does not necessarily indicate the execution of cell division, and a possible change in hepatocyte size is not considered in the model. In addition, as 15–30% of hepatocytes in adult liver are binuclear, the difference in nuclear number may affect the mode of cell division during regeneration. Thus, the traditional model seems to be oversimplified. Recently, we developed new techniques to investigate the process of liver regeneration, and revealed interesting features of hepatocytes. In this review, we first provide a historical overview of how the widely accepted model of liver regeneration was established and then discuss some overlooked observations together with our recent findings. Finally, we describe the revised model and perspectives on liver regeneration research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3695844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36958442013-06-29 To divide or not to divide: revisiting liver regeneration Miyaoka, Yuichiro Miyajima, Atsushi Cell Div Review The liver has a remarkable capacity to regenerate. Even with surgical removal (partial hepatectomy) of 70% of liver mass, the remnant tissue grows to recover the original mass and functions. Liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy has been studied extensively since the 19th century, establishing the long-standing model that hepatocytes, which account for most of the liver weight, proliferate to recover the original mass of the liver. The basis of this model is the fact that almost all hepatocytes undergo S phase, as shown by the incorporation of radioactive nucleotides during liver regeneration. However, DNA replication does not necessarily indicate the execution of cell division, and a possible change in hepatocyte size is not considered in the model. In addition, as 15–30% of hepatocytes in adult liver are binuclear, the difference in nuclear number may affect the mode of cell division during regeneration. Thus, the traditional model seems to be oversimplified. Recently, we developed new techniques to investigate the process of liver regeneration, and revealed interesting features of hepatocytes. In this review, we first provide a historical overview of how the widely accepted model of liver regeneration was established and then discuss some overlooked observations together with our recent findings. Finally, we describe the revised model and perspectives on liver regeneration research. BioMed Central 2013-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3695844/ /pubmed/23786799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-1028-8-8 Text en Copyright © 2013 Miyaoka and Miyajima; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Miyaoka, Yuichiro
Miyajima, Atsushi
To divide or not to divide: revisiting liver regeneration
title To divide or not to divide: revisiting liver regeneration
title_full To divide or not to divide: revisiting liver regeneration
title_fullStr To divide or not to divide: revisiting liver regeneration
title_full_unstemmed To divide or not to divide: revisiting liver regeneration
title_short To divide or not to divide: revisiting liver regeneration
title_sort to divide or not to divide: revisiting liver regeneration
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3695844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23786799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-1028-8-8
work_keys_str_mv AT miyaokayuichiro todivideornottodividerevisitingliverregeneration
AT miyajimaatsushi todivideornottodividerevisitingliverregeneration