Cargando…
To divide or not to divide: revisiting liver regeneration
The liver has a remarkable capacity to regenerate. Even with surgical removal (partial hepatectomy) of 70% of liver mass, the remnant tissue grows to recover the original mass and functions. Liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy has been studied extensively since the 19th century, establishin...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3695844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23786799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-1028-8-8 |
_version_ | 1782275018440310784 |
---|---|
author | Miyaoka, Yuichiro Miyajima, Atsushi |
author_facet | Miyaoka, Yuichiro Miyajima, Atsushi |
author_sort | Miyaoka, Yuichiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | The liver has a remarkable capacity to regenerate. Even with surgical removal (partial hepatectomy) of 70% of liver mass, the remnant tissue grows to recover the original mass and functions. Liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy has been studied extensively since the 19th century, establishing the long-standing model that hepatocytes, which account for most of the liver weight, proliferate to recover the original mass of the liver. The basis of this model is the fact that almost all hepatocytes undergo S phase, as shown by the incorporation of radioactive nucleotides during liver regeneration. However, DNA replication does not necessarily indicate the execution of cell division, and a possible change in hepatocyte size is not considered in the model. In addition, as 15–30% of hepatocytes in adult liver are binuclear, the difference in nuclear number may affect the mode of cell division during regeneration. Thus, the traditional model seems to be oversimplified. Recently, we developed new techniques to investigate the process of liver regeneration, and revealed interesting features of hepatocytes. In this review, we first provide a historical overview of how the widely accepted model of liver regeneration was established and then discuss some overlooked observations together with our recent findings. Finally, we describe the revised model and perspectives on liver regeneration research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3695844 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36958442013-06-29 To divide or not to divide: revisiting liver regeneration Miyaoka, Yuichiro Miyajima, Atsushi Cell Div Review The liver has a remarkable capacity to regenerate. Even with surgical removal (partial hepatectomy) of 70% of liver mass, the remnant tissue grows to recover the original mass and functions. Liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy has been studied extensively since the 19th century, establishing the long-standing model that hepatocytes, which account for most of the liver weight, proliferate to recover the original mass of the liver. The basis of this model is the fact that almost all hepatocytes undergo S phase, as shown by the incorporation of radioactive nucleotides during liver regeneration. However, DNA replication does not necessarily indicate the execution of cell division, and a possible change in hepatocyte size is not considered in the model. In addition, as 15–30% of hepatocytes in adult liver are binuclear, the difference in nuclear number may affect the mode of cell division during regeneration. Thus, the traditional model seems to be oversimplified. Recently, we developed new techniques to investigate the process of liver regeneration, and revealed interesting features of hepatocytes. In this review, we first provide a historical overview of how the widely accepted model of liver regeneration was established and then discuss some overlooked observations together with our recent findings. Finally, we describe the revised model and perspectives on liver regeneration research. BioMed Central 2013-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3695844/ /pubmed/23786799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-1028-8-8 Text en Copyright © 2013 Miyaoka and Miyajima; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Miyaoka, Yuichiro Miyajima, Atsushi To divide or not to divide: revisiting liver regeneration |
title | To divide or not to divide: revisiting liver regeneration |
title_full | To divide or not to divide: revisiting liver regeneration |
title_fullStr | To divide or not to divide: revisiting liver regeneration |
title_full_unstemmed | To divide or not to divide: revisiting liver regeneration |
title_short | To divide or not to divide: revisiting liver regeneration |
title_sort | to divide or not to divide: revisiting liver regeneration |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3695844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23786799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-1028-8-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miyaokayuichiro todivideornottodividerevisitingliverregeneration AT miyajimaatsushi todivideornottodividerevisitingliverregeneration |