Cargando…
Estimating Above-Ground Carbon Biomass in a Newly Restored Coastal Plain Wetland Using Remote Sensing
Developing accurate but inexpensive methods for estimating above-ground carbon biomass is an important technical challenge that must be overcome before a carbon offset market can be successfully implemented in the United States. Previous studies have shown that LiDAR (light detection and ranging) is...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3695897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23840837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068251 |
_version_ | 1782275029932703744 |
---|---|
author | Riegel, Joseph B. Bernhardt, Emily Swenson, Jennifer |
author_facet | Riegel, Joseph B. Bernhardt, Emily Swenson, Jennifer |
author_sort | Riegel, Joseph B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Developing accurate but inexpensive methods for estimating above-ground carbon biomass is an important technical challenge that must be overcome before a carbon offset market can be successfully implemented in the United States. Previous studies have shown that LiDAR (light detection and ranging) is well-suited for modeling above-ground biomass in mature forests; however, there has been little previous research on the ability of LiDAR to model above-ground biomass in areas with young, aggrading vegetation. This study compared the abilities of discrete-return LiDAR and high resolution optical imagery to model above-ground carbon biomass at a young restored forested wetland site in eastern North Carolina. We found that the optical imagery model explained more of the observed variation in carbon biomass than the LiDAR model (adj-R(2) values of 0.34 and 0.18 respectively; root mean squared errors of 0.14 Mg C/ha and 0.17 Mg C/ha respectively). Optical imagery was also better able to predict high and low biomass extremes than the LiDAR model. Combining both the optical and LiDAR improved upon the optical model but only marginally (adj-R(2) of 0.37). These results suggest that the ability of discrete-return LiDAR to model above-ground biomass may be rather limited in areas with young, small trees and that high spatial resolution optical imagery may be the better tool in such areas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3695897 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36958972013-07-09 Estimating Above-Ground Carbon Biomass in a Newly Restored Coastal Plain Wetland Using Remote Sensing Riegel, Joseph B. Bernhardt, Emily Swenson, Jennifer PLoS One Research Article Developing accurate but inexpensive methods for estimating above-ground carbon biomass is an important technical challenge that must be overcome before a carbon offset market can be successfully implemented in the United States. Previous studies have shown that LiDAR (light detection and ranging) is well-suited for modeling above-ground biomass in mature forests; however, there has been little previous research on the ability of LiDAR to model above-ground biomass in areas with young, aggrading vegetation. This study compared the abilities of discrete-return LiDAR and high resolution optical imagery to model above-ground carbon biomass at a young restored forested wetland site in eastern North Carolina. We found that the optical imagery model explained more of the observed variation in carbon biomass than the LiDAR model (adj-R(2) values of 0.34 and 0.18 respectively; root mean squared errors of 0.14 Mg C/ha and 0.17 Mg C/ha respectively). Optical imagery was also better able to predict high and low biomass extremes than the LiDAR model. Combining both the optical and LiDAR improved upon the optical model but only marginally (adj-R(2) of 0.37). These results suggest that the ability of discrete-return LiDAR to model above-ground biomass may be rather limited in areas with young, small trees and that high spatial resolution optical imagery may be the better tool in such areas. Public Library of Science 2013-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3695897/ /pubmed/23840837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068251 Text en © 2013 Riegel et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Riegel, Joseph B. Bernhardt, Emily Swenson, Jennifer Estimating Above-Ground Carbon Biomass in a Newly Restored Coastal Plain Wetland Using Remote Sensing |
title | Estimating Above-Ground Carbon Biomass in a Newly Restored Coastal Plain Wetland Using Remote Sensing |
title_full | Estimating Above-Ground Carbon Biomass in a Newly Restored Coastal Plain Wetland Using Remote Sensing |
title_fullStr | Estimating Above-Ground Carbon Biomass in a Newly Restored Coastal Plain Wetland Using Remote Sensing |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating Above-Ground Carbon Biomass in a Newly Restored Coastal Plain Wetland Using Remote Sensing |
title_short | Estimating Above-Ground Carbon Biomass in a Newly Restored Coastal Plain Wetland Using Remote Sensing |
title_sort | estimating above-ground carbon biomass in a newly restored coastal plain wetland using remote sensing |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3695897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23840837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068251 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT riegeljosephb estimatingabovegroundcarbonbiomassinanewlyrestoredcoastalplainwetlandusingremotesensing AT bernhardtemily estimatingabovegroundcarbonbiomassinanewlyrestoredcoastalplainwetlandusingremotesensing AT swensonjennifer estimatingabovegroundcarbonbiomassinanewlyrestoredcoastalplainwetlandusingremotesensing |