Cargando…

HPV vaccination programs have not been shown to be cost-effective in countries with comprehensive Pap screening and surgery

Pap screening combined with loop electrosurgical excision procedures (LEEP) is almost 100% effective in preventing cervical cancer mortality yet many countries with these procedures have now implemented broad HPV vaccination programs. HPV vaccines have not been demonstrated to be more effective or s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Wilyman, Judy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3698073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23758803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-9378-8-21
_version_ 1782275234540290048
author Wilyman, Judy
author_facet Wilyman, Judy
author_sort Wilyman, Judy
collection PubMed
description Pap screening combined with loop electrosurgical excision procedures (LEEP) is almost 100% effective in preventing cervical cancer mortality yet many countries with these procedures have now implemented broad HPV vaccination programs. HPV vaccines have not been demonstrated to be more effective or safer than Pap screening in the prevention of cervical cancer and Pap screening will still be required even in vaccinated women. The HPV vaccine costs Au$450 per person and it does not protect against ~30% of cancer. This investigation analyses the cost-effectiveness of using the HPV vaccine in countries where Pap screening and surgical procedures have already reduced cervical cancer mortality to very low rates. Cost-effectiveness of vaccination programs is being determined by mathematical models which are founded on many assumptions. It is necessary to examine the rigor of these assumptions to be certain of the health benefits that are predicted. In 2002 scientists concluded that HPV 16 and 18 were the central and independent cause of most cervical cancer. This conclusion was based on molecular technology. If HPV 16 and 18 infections are the central and independent cause of most cervical cancer then the incidence of HPV 16 and 18 should vary with the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer worldwide. This correlation does not exist. It is also observed that the majority of HPV 16/18 infections do not lead to cervical cancer. This indicates that other etiological or ‘risk’ factors are necessary for persistent HPV infection to progress to cancer. The benefits of HPV vaccines have been determined by using pre-cancerous lesions in young women as a surrogate for cervical cancer. This surrogate is found to be inadequate as an end-point for cervical cancer. Clinical trials have only provided speculative benefits for the efficacy of HPV vaccines against cancer and the long-term risks of the vaccine have not been established. Pap screening will still be required in vaccinated women hence HPV vaccination programs are not cost-effective, and may do more harm than good, in countries where regular Pap screening and surgery has already reduced the burden of this disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3698073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36980732013-07-02 HPV vaccination programs have not been shown to be cost-effective in countries with comprehensive Pap screening and surgery Wilyman, Judy Infect Agent Cancer Review Pap screening combined with loop electrosurgical excision procedures (LEEP) is almost 100% effective in preventing cervical cancer mortality yet many countries with these procedures have now implemented broad HPV vaccination programs. HPV vaccines have not been demonstrated to be more effective or safer than Pap screening in the prevention of cervical cancer and Pap screening will still be required even in vaccinated women. The HPV vaccine costs Au$450 per person and it does not protect against ~30% of cancer. This investigation analyses the cost-effectiveness of using the HPV vaccine in countries where Pap screening and surgical procedures have already reduced cervical cancer mortality to very low rates. Cost-effectiveness of vaccination programs is being determined by mathematical models which are founded on many assumptions. It is necessary to examine the rigor of these assumptions to be certain of the health benefits that are predicted. In 2002 scientists concluded that HPV 16 and 18 were the central and independent cause of most cervical cancer. This conclusion was based on molecular technology. If HPV 16 and 18 infections are the central and independent cause of most cervical cancer then the incidence of HPV 16 and 18 should vary with the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer worldwide. This correlation does not exist. It is also observed that the majority of HPV 16/18 infections do not lead to cervical cancer. This indicates that other etiological or ‘risk’ factors are necessary for persistent HPV infection to progress to cancer. The benefits of HPV vaccines have been determined by using pre-cancerous lesions in young women as a surrogate for cervical cancer. This surrogate is found to be inadequate as an end-point for cervical cancer. Clinical trials have only provided speculative benefits for the efficacy of HPV vaccines against cancer and the long-term risks of the vaccine have not been established. Pap screening will still be required in vaccinated women hence HPV vaccination programs are not cost-effective, and may do more harm than good, in countries where regular Pap screening and surgery has already reduced the burden of this disease. BioMed Central 2013-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3698073/ /pubmed/23758803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-9378-8-21 Text en Copyright © 2013 Wilyman; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Wilyman, Judy
HPV vaccination programs have not been shown to be cost-effective in countries with comprehensive Pap screening and surgery
title HPV vaccination programs have not been shown to be cost-effective in countries with comprehensive Pap screening and surgery
title_full HPV vaccination programs have not been shown to be cost-effective in countries with comprehensive Pap screening and surgery
title_fullStr HPV vaccination programs have not been shown to be cost-effective in countries with comprehensive Pap screening and surgery
title_full_unstemmed HPV vaccination programs have not been shown to be cost-effective in countries with comprehensive Pap screening and surgery
title_short HPV vaccination programs have not been shown to be cost-effective in countries with comprehensive Pap screening and surgery
title_sort hpv vaccination programs have not been shown to be cost-effective in countries with comprehensive pap screening and surgery
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3698073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23758803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-9378-8-21
work_keys_str_mv AT wilymanjudy hpvvaccinationprogramshavenotbeenshowntobecosteffectiveincountrieswithcomprehensivepapscreeningandsurgery