Cargando…

Rationale and design of the Multicenter Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study (MARQUIS)

BACKGROUND: Unresolved medication discrepancies during hospitalization can contribute to adverse drug events, resulting in patient harm. Discrepancies can be reduced by performing medication reconciliation; however, effective implementation of medication reconciliation has proven to be challenging....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salanitro, Amanda H, Kripalani, Sunil, Resnic, JoAnne, Mueller, Stephanie K, Wetterneck, Tosha B, Haynes, Katherine Taylor, Stein, Jason, Kaboli, Peter J, Labonville, Stephanie, Etchells, Edward, Cobaugh, Daniel J, Hanson, David, Greenwald, Jeffrey L, Williams, Mark V, Schnipper, Jeffrey L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3698100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23800355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-230
_version_ 1782275241327722496
author Salanitro, Amanda H
Kripalani, Sunil
Resnic, JoAnne
Mueller, Stephanie K
Wetterneck, Tosha B
Haynes, Katherine Taylor
Stein, Jason
Kaboli, Peter J
Labonville, Stephanie
Etchells, Edward
Cobaugh, Daniel J
Hanson, David
Greenwald, Jeffrey L
Williams, Mark V
Schnipper, Jeffrey L
author_facet Salanitro, Amanda H
Kripalani, Sunil
Resnic, JoAnne
Mueller, Stephanie K
Wetterneck, Tosha B
Haynes, Katherine Taylor
Stein, Jason
Kaboli, Peter J
Labonville, Stephanie
Etchells, Edward
Cobaugh, Daniel J
Hanson, David
Greenwald, Jeffrey L
Williams, Mark V
Schnipper, Jeffrey L
author_sort Salanitro, Amanda H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Unresolved medication discrepancies during hospitalization can contribute to adverse drug events, resulting in patient harm. Discrepancies can be reduced by performing medication reconciliation; however, effective implementation of medication reconciliation has proven to be challenging. The goals of the Multi-Center Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study (MARQUIS) are to operationalize best practices for inpatient medication reconciliation, test their effect on potentially harmful unintentional medication discrepancies, and understand barriers and facilitators of successful implementation. METHODS: Six U.S. hospitals are participating in this quality improvement mentored implementation study. Each hospital has collected baseline data on the primary outcome: the number of potentially harmful unintentional medication discrepancies per patient, as determined by a trained on-site pharmacist taking a “gold standard” medication history. With the guidance of their mentors, each site has also begun to implement one or more of 11 best practices to improve medication reconciliation. To understand the effect of the implemented interventions on hospital staff and culture, we are performing mixed methods program evaluation including surveys, interviews, and focus groups of front line staff and hospital leaders. DISCUSSION: At baseline the number of unintentional medication discrepancies in admission and discharge orders per patient varies by site from 2.35 to 4.67 (mean=3.35). Most discrepancies are due to history errors (mean 2.12 per patient) as opposed to reconciliation errors (mean 1.23 per patient). Potentially harmful medication discrepancies averages 0.45 per patient and varies by site from 0.13 to 0.82 per patient. We discuss several barriers to implementation encountered thus far. In the end, we anticipate that MARQUIS tools and lessons learned have the potential to decrease medication discrepancies and improve patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01337063
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3698100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36981002013-07-02 Rationale and design of the Multicenter Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study (MARQUIS) Salanitro, Amanda H Kripalani, Sunil Resnic, JoAnne Mueller, Stephanie K Wetterneck, Tosha B Haynes, Katherine Taylor Stein, Jason Kaboli, Peter J Labonville, Stephanie Etchells, Edward Cobaugh, Daniel J Hanson, David Greenwald, Jeffrey L Williams, Mark V Schnipper, Jeffrey L BMC Health Serv Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Unresolved medication discrepancies during hospitalization can contribute to adverse drug events, resulting in patient harm. Discrepancies can be reduced by performing medication reconciliation; however, effective implementation of medication reconciliation has proven to be challenging. The goals of the Multi-Center Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study (MARQUIS) are to operationalize best practices for inpatient medication reconciliation, test their effect on potentially harmful unintentional medication discrepancies, and understand barriers and facilitators of successful implementation. METHODS: Six U.S. hospitals are participating in this quality improvement mentored implementation study. Each hospital has collected baseline data on the primary outcome: the number of potentially harmful unintentional medication discrepancies per patient, as determined by a trained on-site pharmacist taking a “gold standard” medication history. With the guidance of their mentors, each site has also begun to implement one or more of 11 best practices to improve medication reconciliation. To understand the effect of the implemented interventions on hospital staff and culture, we are performing mixed methods program evaluation including surveys, interviews, and focus groups of front line staff and hospital leaders. DISCUSSION: At baseline the number of unintentional medication discrepancies in admission and discharge orders per patient varies by site from 2.35 to 4.67 (mean=3.35). Most discrepancies are due to history errors (mean 2.12 per patient) as opposed to reconciliation errors (mean 1.23 per patient). Potentially harmful medication discrepancies averages 0.45 per patient and varies by site from 0.13 to 0.82 per patient. We discuss several barriers to implementation encountered thus far. In the end, we anticipate that MARQUIS tools and lessons learned have the potential to decrease medication discrepancies and improve patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01337063 BioMed Central 2013-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3698100/ /pubmed/23800355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-230 Text en Copyright © 2013 Salanitro et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Salanitro, Amanda H
Kripalani, Sunil
Resnic, JoAnne
Mueller, Stephanie K
Wetterneck, Tosha B
Haynes, Katherine Taylor
Stein, Jason
Kaboli, Peter J
Labonville, Stephanie
Etchells, Edward
Cobaugh, Daniel J
Hanson, David
Greenwald, Jeffrey L
Williams, Mark V
Schnipper, Jeffrey L
Rationale and design of the Multicenter Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study (MARQUIS)
title Rationale and design of the Multicenter Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study (MARQUIS)
title_full Rationale and design of the Multicenter Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study (MARQUIS)
title_fullStr Rationale and design of the Multicenter Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study (MARQUIS)
title_full_unstemmed Rationale and design of the Multicenter Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study (MARQUIS)
title_short Rationale and design of the Multicenter Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study (MARQUIS)
title_sort rationale and design of the multicenter medication reconciliation quality improvement study (marquis)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3698100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23800355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-230
work_keys_str_mv AT salanitroamandah rationaleanddesignofthemulticentermedicationreconciliationqualityimprovementstudymarquis
AT kripalanisunil rationaleanddesignofthemulticentermedicationreconciliationqualityimprovementstudymarquis
AT resnicjoanne rationaleanddesignofthemulticentermedicationreconciliationqualityimprovementstudymarquis
AT muellerstephaniek rationaleanddesignofthemulticentermedicationreconciliationqualityimprovementstudymarquis
AT wetternecktoshab rationaleanddesignofthemulticentermedicationreconciliationqualityimprovementstudymarquis
AT hayneskatherinetaylor rationaleanddesignofthemulticentermedicationreconciliationqualityimprovementstudymarquis
AT steinjason rationaleanddesignofthemulticentermedicationreconciliationqualityimprovementstudymarquis
AT kabolipeterj rationaleanddesignofthemulticentermedicationreconciliationqualityimprovementstudymarquis
AT labonvillestephanie rationaleanddesignofthemulticentermedicationreconciliationqualityimprovementstudymarquis
AT etchellsedward rationaleanddesignofthemulticentermedicationreconciliationqualityimprovementstudymarquis
AT cobaughdanielj rationaleanddesignofthemulticentermedicationreconciliationqualityimprovementstudymarquis
AT hansondavid rationaleanddesignofthemulticentermedicationreconciliationqualityimprovementstudymarquis
AT greenwaldjeffreyl rationaleanddesignofthemulticentermedicationreconciliationqualityimprovementstudymarquis
AT williamsmarkv rationaleanddesignofthemulticentermedicationreconciliationqualityimprovementstudymarquis
AT schnipperjeffreyl rationaleanddesignofthemulticentermedicationreconciliationqualityimprovementstudymarquis