Cargando…
Modeling hospital infrastructure by optimizing quality, accessibility and efficiency via a mixed integer programming model
BACKGROUND: The majority of curative health care is organized in hospitals. As in most other countries, the current 94 hospital locations in the Netherlands offer almost all treatments, ranging from rather basic to very complex care. Recent studies show that concentration of care can lead to substan...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3698106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23768234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-220 |
_version_ | 1782275242753785856 |
---|---|
author | Ikkersheim, David Tanke, Marit van Schooten, Gwendy de Bresser, Niels Fleuren, Hein |
author_facet | Ikkersheim, David Tanke, Marit van Schooten, Gwendy de Bresser, Niels Fleuren, Hein |
author_sort | Ikkersheim, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The majority of curative health care is organized in hospitals. As in most other countries, the current 94 hospital locations in the Netherlands offer almost all treatments, ranging from rather basic to very complex care. Recent studies show that concentration of care can lead to substantial quality improvements for complex conditions and that dispersion of care for chronic conditions may increase quality of care. In previous studies on allocation of hospital infrastructure, the allocation is usually only based on accessibility and/or efficiency of hospital care. In this paper, we explore the possibilities to include a quality function in the objective function, to give global directions to how the ‘optimal’ hospital infrastructure would be in the Dutch context. METHODS: To create optimal societal value we have used a mathematical mixed integer programming (MIP) model that balances quality, efficiency and accessibility of care for 30 ICD-9 diagnosis groups. Typical aspects that are taken into account are the volume-outcome relationship, the maximum accepted travel times for diagnosis groups that may need emergency treatment and the minimum use of facilities. RESULTS: The optimal number of hospital locations per diagnosis group varies from 12-14 locations for diagnosis groups which have a strong volume-outcome relationship, such as neoplasms, to 150 locations for chronic diagnosis groups such as diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our study shows a new approach for allocating hospital infrastructure over a country or certain region that includes quality of care in relation to volume per provider that can be used in various countries or regions. In addition, our model shows that within the Dutch context chronic care may be too concentrated and complex and/or acute care may be too dispersed. Our approach can relatively easily be adopted towards other countries or regions and is very suitable to perform a ‘what-if’ analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3698106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36981062013-07-02 Modeling hospital infrastructure by optimizing quality, accessibility and efficiency via a mixed integer programming model Ikkersheim, David Tanke, Marit van Schooten, Gwendy de Bresser, Niels Fleuren, Hein BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The majority of curative health care is organized in hospitals. As in most other countries, the current 94 hospital locations in the Netherlands offer almost all treatments, ranging from rather basic to very complex care. Recent studies show that concentration of care can lead to substantial quality improvements for complex conditions and that dispersion of care for chronic conditions may increase quality of care. In previous studies on allocation of hospital infrastructure, the allocation is usually only based on accessibility and/or efficiency of hospital care. In this paper, we explore the possibilities to include a quality function in the objective function, to give global directions to how the ‘optimal’ hospital infrastructure would be in the Dutch context. METHODS: To create optimal societal value we have used a mathematical mixed integer programming (MIP) model that balances quality, efficiency and accessibility of care for 30 ICD-9 diagnosis groups. Typical aspects that are taken into account are the volume-outcome relationship, the maximum accepted travel times for diagnosis groups that may need emergency treatment and the minimum use of facilities. RESULTS: The optimal number of hospital locations per diagnosis group varies from 12-14 locations for diagnosis groups which have a strong volume-outcome relationship, such as neoplasms, to 150 locations for chronic diagnosis groups such as diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our study shows a new approach for allocating hospital infrastructure over a country or certain region that includes quality of care in relation to volume per provider that can be used in various countries or regions. In addition, our model shows that within the Dutch context chronic care may be too concentrated and complex and/or acute care may be too dispersed. Our approach can relatively easily be adopted towards other countries or regions and is very suitable to perform a ‘what-if’ analysis. BioMed Central 2013-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3698106/ /pubmed/23768234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-220 Text en Copyright © 2013 Ikkersheim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ikkersheim, David Tanke, Marit van Schooten, Gwendy de Bresser, Niels Fleuren, Hein Modeling hospital infrastructure by optimizing quality, accessibility and efficiency via a mixed integer programming model |
title | Modeling hospital infrastructure by optimizing quality, accessibility and efficiency via a mixed integer programming model |
title_full | Modeling hospital infrastructure by optimizing quality, accessibility and efficiency via a mixed integer programming model |
title_fullStr | Modeling hospital infrastructure by optimizing quality, accessibility and efficiency via a mixed integer programming model |
title_full_unstemmed | Modeling hospital infrastructure by optimizing quality, accessibility and efficiency via a mixed integer programming model |
title_short | Modeling hospital infrastructure by optimizing quality, accessibility and efficiency via a mixed integer programming model |
title_sort | modeling hospital infrastructure by optimizing quality, accessibility and efficiency via a mixed integer programming model |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3698106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23768234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-220 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ikkersheimdavid modelinghospitalinfrastructurebyoptimizingqualityaccessibilityandefficiencyviaamixedintegerprogrammingmodel AT tankemarit modelinghospitalinfrastructurebyoptimizingqualityaccessibilityandefficiencyviaamixedintegerprogrammingmodel AT vanschootengwendy modelinghospitalinfrastructurebyoptimizingqualityaccessibilityandefficiencyviaamixedintegerprogrammingmodel AT debresserniels modelinghospitalinfrastructurebyoptimizingqualityaccessibilityandefficiencyviaamixedintegerprogrammingmodel AT fleurenhein modelinghospitalinfrastructurebyoptimizingqualityaccessibilityandefficiencyviaamixedintegerprogrammingmodel |