Cargando…

Genetic variation in four maturity genes affects photoperiod insensitivity and PHYA-regulated post-flowering responses of soybean

BACKGROUND: Absence of or low sensitivity to photoperiod is necessary for short-day crops, such as rice and soybean, to adapt to high latitudes. Photoperiod insensitivity in soybeans is controlled by two genetic systems and involves three important maturity genes: E1, a repressor for two soybean ort...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Meilan, Xu, Zeheng, Liu, Baohui, Kong, Fanjiang, Tsubokura, Yasutaka, Watanabe, Satoshi, Xia, Zhengjun, Harada, Kyuya, Kanazawa, Akira, Yamada, Testuya, Abe, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3698206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23799885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-13-91
_version_ 1782275266007007232
author Xu, Meilan
Xu, Zeheng
Liu, Baohui
Kong, Fanjiang
Tsubokura, Yasutaka
Watanabe, Satoshi
Xia, Zhengjun
Harada, Kyuya
Kanazawa, Akira
Yamada, Testuya
Abe, Jun
author_facet Xu, Meilan
Xu, Zeheng
Liu, Baohui
Kong, Fanjiang
Tsubokura, Yasutaka
Watanabe, Satoshi
Xia, Zhengjun
Harada, Kyuya
Kanazawa, Akira
Yamada, Testuya
Abe, Jun
author_sort Xu, Meilan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Absence of or low sensitivity to photoperiod is necessary for short-day crops, such as rice and soybean, to adapt to high latitudes. Photoperiod insensitivity in soybeans is controlled by two genetic systems and involves three important maturity genes: E1, a repressor for two soybean orthologs of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T (GmFT2a and GmFT5a), and E3 and E4, which are phytochrome A genes. To elucidate the diverse mechanisms underlying photoperiod insensitivity in soybean, we assessed the genotypes of four maturity genes (E1 through E4) in early-flowering photoperiod-insensitive cultivars and their association with post-flowering responses. RESULTS: We found two novel dysfunctional alleles in accessions originally considered to have a dominant E3 allele according to known DNA markers. The E3 locus, together with E1 and E4, contained multiple dysfunctional alleles. We identified 15 multi-locus genotypes, which we subdivided into 6 genotypic groups by classifying their alleles by function. Of these, the e1-as/e3/E4 genotypic group required an additional novel gene (different from E1, E3, and E4) to condition photoperiod insensitivity. Despite their common pre-flowering photoperiod insensitivity, accessions with different multi-locus genotypes responded differently to the post-flowering photoperiod. Cultivars carrying E3 or E4 were sensitive to photoperiod for post-flowering characteristics, such as reproductive period and stem growth after flowering. The phytochrome A–regulated expression of the determinate growth habit gene Dt1, an ortholog of Arabidopsis TERMINAL FLOWER1, was involved in the persistence of the vegetative activity at the stem apical meristem of flower-induced plants under long-day conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Diverse genetic mechanisms underlie photoperiod insensitivity in soybean. At least three multi-locus genotypes consisting of various allelic combinations at E1, E3, and E4 conferred pre-flowering photoperiod insensitivity to soybean cultivars but led to different responses to photoperiod during post-flowering vegetative and reproductive development. The phyA genes E3 and E4 are major controllers underlying not only pre-flowering but also post-flowering photoperiod responses. The current findings improve our understanding of genetic diversity in pre-flowering photoperiod insensitivity and mechanisms of post-flowering photoperiod responses in soybean.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3698206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36982062013-07-02 Genetic variation in four maturity genes affects photoperiod insensitivity and PHYA-regulated post-flowering responses of soybean Xu, Meilan Xu, Zeheng Liu, Baohui Kong, Fanjiang Tsubokura, Yasutaka Watanabe, Satoshi Xia, Zhengjun Harada, Kyuya Kanazawa, Akira Yamada, Testuya Abe, Jun BMC Plant Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Absence of or low sensitivity to photoperiod is necessary for short-day crops, such as rice and soybean, to adapt to high latitudes. Photoperiod insensitivity in soybeans is controlled by two genetic systems and involves three important maturity genes: E1, a repressor for two soybean orthologs of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T (GmFT2a and GmFT5a), and E3 and E4, which are phytochrome A genes. To elucidate the diverse mechanisms underlying photoperiod insensitivity in soybean, we assessed the genotypes of four maturity genes (E1 through E4) in early-flowering photoperiod-insensitive cultivars and their association with post-flowering responses. RESULTS: We found two novel dysfunctional alleles in accessions originally considered to have a dominant E3 allele according to known DNA markers. The E3 locus, together with E1 and E4, contained multiple dysfunctional alleles. We identified 15 multi-locus genotypes, which we subdivided into 6 genotypic groups by classifying their alleles by function. Of these, the e1-as/e3/E4 genotypic group required an additional novel gene (different from E1, E3, and E4) to condition photoperiod insensitivity. Despite their common pre-flowering photoperiod insensitivity, accessions with different multi-locus genotypes responded differently to the post-flowering photoperiod. Cultivars carrying E3 or E4 were sensitive to photoperiod for post-flowering characteristics, such as reproductive period and stem growth after flowering. The phytochrome A–regulated expression of the determinate growth habit gene Dt1, an ortholog of Arabidopsis TERMINAL FLOWER1, was involved in the persistence of the vegetative activity at the stem apical meristem of flower-induced plants under long-day conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Diverse genetic mechanisms underlie photoperiod insensitivity in soybean. At least three multi-locus genotypes consisting of various allelic combinations at E1, E3, and E4 conferred pre-flowering photoperiod insensitivity to soybean cultivars but led to different responses to photoperiod during post-flowering vegetative and reproductive development. The phyA genes E3 and E4 are major controllers underlying not only pre-flowering but also post-flowering photoperiod responses. The current findings improve our understanding of genetic diversity in pre-flowering photoperiod insensitivity and mechanisms of post-flowering photoperiod responses in soybean. BioMed Central 2013-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3698206/ /pubmed/23799885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-13-91 Text en Copyright © 2013 Xu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xu, Meilan
Xu, Zeheng
Liu, Baohui
Kong, Fanjiang
Tsubokura, Yasutaka
Watanabe, Satoshi
Xia, Zhengjun
Harada, Kyuya
Kanazawa, Akira
Yamada, Testuya
Abe, Jun
Genetic variation in four maturity genes affects photoperiod insensitivity and PHYA-regulated post-flowering responses of soybean
title Genetic variation in four maturity genes affects photoperiod insensitivity and PHYA-regulated post-flowering responses of soybean
title_full Genetic variation in four maturity genes affects photoperiod insensitivity and PHYA-regulated post-flowering responses of soybean
title_fullStr Genetic variation in four maturity genes affects photoperiod insensitivity and PHYA-regulated post-flowering responses of soybean
title_full_unstemmed Genetic variation in four maturity genes affects photoperiod insensitivity and PHYA-regulated post-flowering responses of soybean
title_short Genetic variation in four maturity genes affects photoperiod insensitivity and PHYA-regulated post-flowering responses of soybean
title_sort genetic variation in four maturity genes affects photoperiod insensitivity and phya-regulated post-flowering responses of soybean
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3698206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23799885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-13-91
work_keys_str_mv AT xumeilan geneticvariationinfourmaturitygenesaffectsphotoperiodinsensitivityandphyaregulatedpostfloweringresponsesofsoybean
AT xuzeheng geneticvariationinfourmaturitygenesaffectsphotoperiodinsensitivityandphyaregulatedpostfloweringresponsesofsoybean
AT liubaohui geneticvariationinfourmaturitygenesaffectsphotoperiodinsensitivityandphyaregulatedpostfloweringresponsesofsoybean
AT kongfanjiang geneticvariationinfourmaturitygenesaffectsphotoperiodinsensitivityandphyaregulatedpostfloweringresponsesofsoybean
AT tsubokurayasutaka geneticvariationinfourmaturitygenesaffectsphotoperiodinsensitivityandphyaregulatedpostfloweringresponsesofsoybean
AT watanabesatoshi geneticvariationinfourmaturitygenesaffectsphotoperiodinsensitivityandphyaregulatedpostfloweringresponsesofsoybean
AT xiazhengjun geneticvariationinfourmaturitygenesaffectsphotoperiodinsensitivityandphyaregulatedpostfloweringresponsesofsoybean
AT haradakyuya geneticvariationinfourmaturitygenesaffectsphotoperiodinsensitivityandphyaregulatedpostfloweringresponsesofsoybean
AT kanazawaakira geneticvariationinfourmaturitygenesaffectsphotoperiodinsensitivityandphyaregulatedpostfloweringresponsesofsoybean
AT yamadatestuya geneticvariationinfourmaturitygenesaffectsphotoperiodinsensitivityandphyaregulatedpostfloweringresponsesofsoybean
AT abejun geneticvariationinfourmaturitygenesaffectsphotoperiodinsensitivityandphyaregulatedpostfloweringresponsesofsoybean