Cargando…

Is abeta a sufficient biomarker for monitoring anti-abeta clinical studies? A critical review

Amyloid-beta (Aβ) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) appeared to be a promising target for disease-modifying therapeutic strategies like passive immunotherapy with anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Biochemical markers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) include alterations of Aβ that allow the diagnosis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moreth, Jens, Mavoungou, Chrystelle, Schindowski, Katharina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3698450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23847530
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2013.00025
_version_ 1782275289626181632
author Moreth, Jens
Mavoungou, Chrystelle
Schindowski, Katharina
author_facet Moreth, Jens
Mavoungou, Chrystelle
Schindowski, Katharina
author_sort Moreth, Jens
collection PubMed
description Amyloid-beta (Aβ) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) appeared to be a promising target for disease-modifying therapeutic strategies like passive immunotherapy with anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Biochemical markers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) include alterations of Aβ that allow the diagnosis of AD. Biomarker strategies, such as the levels of Aβ in CSF and plasma, currently play an important role in early clinical trials for AD. Indeed, these strategies have a relevant impact on the outcome of such studies, since the biomarkers are used to monitor the bioactivity of anti-Aβ mAbs. The clinical trials of Solanezumab were mainly based on the readout of Aβ levels in CSF and plasma, whereas those of Bapineuzumab were based on cognition; however, little is known about the mechanisms altering these biomarker levels, and no biomarker has yet been proven to be a successful predictor for AD therapy. In addition, the Aβ biomarkers allow for the determination of free and bound anti-Aβ mAb in order to monitor the available amount of bioactive drug and could give hints to the mechanism of action. In this review, we discuss clinical Aβ biomarker data and the latest regulatory strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3698450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36984502013-07-11 Is abeta a sufficient biomarker for monitoring anti-abeta clinical studies? A critical review Moreth, Jens Mavoungou, Chrystelle Schindowski, Katharina Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience Amyloid-beta (Aβ) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) appeared to be a promising target for disease-modifying therapeutic strategies like passive immunotherapy with anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Biochemical markers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) include alterations of Aβ that allow the diagnosis of AD. Biomarker strategies, such as the levels of Aβ in CSF and plasma, currently play an important role in early clinical trials for AD. Indeed, these strategies have a relevant impact on the outcome of such studies, since the biomarkers are used to monitor the bioactivity of anti-Aβ mAbs. The clinical trials of Solanezumab were mainly based on the readout of Aβ levels in CSF and plasma, whereas those of Bapineuzumab were based on cognition; however, little is known about the mechanisms altering these biomarker levels, and no biomarker has yet been proven to be a successful predictor for AD therapy. In addition, the Aβ biomarkers allow for the determination of free and bound anti-Aβ mAb in order to monitor the available amount of bioactive drug and could give hints to the mechanism of action. In this review, we discuss clinical Aβ biomarker data and the latest regulatory strategies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3698450/ /pubmed/23847530 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2013.00025 Text en Copyright © 2013 Moreth, Mavoungou and Schindowski. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Moreth, Jens
Mavoungou, Chrystelle
Schindowski, Katharina
Is abeta a sufficient biomarker for monitoring anti-abeta clinical studies? A critical review
title Is abeta a sufficient biomarker for monitoring anti-abeta clinical studies? A critical review
title_full Is abeta a sufficient biomarker for monitoring anti-abeta clinical studies? A critical review
title_fullStr Is abeta a sufficient biomarker for monitoring anti-abeta clinical studies? A critical review
title_full_unstemmed Is abeta a sufficient biomarker for monitoring anti-abeta clinical studies? A critical review
title_short Is abeta a sufficient biomarker for monitoring anti-abeta clinical studies? A critical review
title_sort is abeta a sufficient biomarker for monitoring anti-abeta clinical studies? a critical review
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3698450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23847530
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2013.00025
work_keys_str_mv AT morethjens isabetaasufficientbiomarkerformonitoringantiabetaclinicalstudiesacriticalreview
AT mavoungouchrystelle isabetaasufficientbiomarkerformonitoringantiabetaclinicalstudiesacriticalreview
AT schindowskikatharina isabetaasufficientbiomarkerformonitoringantiabetaclinicalstudiesacriticalreview