Cargando…

Effectiveness of light emitting diode and halogen light curing units for curing microhybrid and nanocomposites

AIM: To compare the polymerization efficacy of micro-hybrid and nanocomposites cured with Quartz-tungsten halogen (QTH) and light emitting diode (LED) light curing units (LCUs). The effectiveness of pulse cure mode in LED LCU was also investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both micro-hybrid and nanoco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choudhary, Shwetha, Suprabha, BS
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3698587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23833457
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.111322
_version_ 1782275315745161216
author Choudhary, Shwetha
Suprabha, BS
author_facet Choudhary, Shwetha
Suprabha, BS
author_sort Choudhary, Shwetha
collection PubMed
description AIM: To compare the polymerization efficacy of micro-hybrid and nanocomposites cured with Quartz-tungsten halogen (QTH) and light emitting diode (LED) light curing units (LCUs). The effectiveness of pulse cure mode in LED LCU was also investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both micro-hybrid and nanocomposite specimens were cured using four different curing protocols giving a total of eight experimental groups. Ten cylindrical specimens were prepared for each group, and light cured for 40 s on the top surface, thus giving a total of eighty specimens. Vicker hardness measurements were carried out on the top and bottom surfaces after 24 h and hardness ratio was calculated. RESULTS: For both micro-hybrid and nanocomposites, highest mean VHN was observed for the group cured with QTH LCU, and the lowest was observed for the group cured with second LED LCU in standard mode but the difference was significant only in case of nanocomposite. CONCLUSION: Curing nanocomposites with QTH LCU results in better micro hardness. Pulse cure mode does not effectively increase polymerization efficacy than the standard mode of curing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3698587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36985872013-07-05 Effectiveness of light emitting diode and halogen light curing units for curing microhybrid and nanocomposites Choudhary, Shwetha Suprabha, BS J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: To compare the polymerization efficacy of micro-hybrid and nanocomposites cured with Quartz-tungsten halogen (QTH) and light emitting diode (LED) light curing units (LCUs). The effectiveness of pulse cure mode in LED LCU was also investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both micro-hybrid and nanocomposite specimens were cured using four different curing protocols giving a total of eight experimental groups. Ten cylindrical specimens were prepared for each group, and light cured for 40 s on the top surface, thus giving a total of eighty specimens. Vicker hardness measurements were carried out on the top and bottom surfaces after 24 h and hardness ratio was calculated. RESULTS: For both micro-hybrid and nanocomposites, highest mean VHN was observed for the group cured with QTH LCU, and the lowest was observed for the group cured with second LED LCU in standard mode but the difference was significant only in case of nanocomposite. CONCLUSION: Curing nanocomposites with QTH LCU results in better micro hardness. Pulse cure mode does not effectively increase polymerization efficacy than the standard mode of curing. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3698587/ /pubmed/23833457 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.111322 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Choudhary, Shwetha
Suprabha, BS
Effectiveness of light emitting diode and halogen light curing units for curing microhybrid and nanocomposites
title Effectiveness of light emitting diode and halogen light curing units for curing microhybrid and nanocomposites
title_full Effectiveness of light emitting diode and halogen light curing units for curing microhybrid and nanocomposites
title_fullStr Effectiveness of light emitting diode and halogen light curing units for curing microhybrid and nanocomposites
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of light emitting diode and halogen light curing units for curing microhybrid and nanocomposites
title_short Effectiveness of light emitting diode and halogen light curing units for curing microhybrid and nanocomposites
title_sort effectiveness of light emitting diode and halogen light curing units for curing microhybrid and nanocomposites
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3698587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23833457
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.111322
work_keys_str_mv AT choudharyshwetha effectivenessoflightemittingdiodeandhalogenlightcuringunitsforcuringmicrohybridandnanocomposites
AT suprabhabs effectivenessoflightemittingdiodeandhalogenlightcuringunitsforcuringmicrohybridandnanocomposites