Cargando…

Care in specialist medical and mental health unit compared with standard care for older people with cognitive impairment admitted to general hospital: randomised controlled trial (NIHR TEAM trial)

Objective To develop and evaluate a best practice model of general hospital acute medical care for older people with cognitive impairment. Design Randomised controlled trial, adapted to take account of constraints imposed by a busy acute medical admission system. Setting Large acute general hospital...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goldberg, Sarah E, Bradshaw, Lucy E, Kearney, Fiona C, Russell, Catherine, Whittamore, Kathy H, Foster, Pippa E R, Mamza, Jil, Gladman, John R F, Jones, Rob G, Lewis, Sarah A, Porock, Davina, Harwood, Rowan H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3698942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23819964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f4132
_version_ 1782275348244725760
author Goldberg, Sarah E
Bradshaw, Lucy E
Kearney, Fiona C
Russell, Catherine
Whittamore, Kathy H
Foster, Pippa E R
Mamza, Jil
Gladman, John R F
Jones, Rob G
Lewis, Sarah A
Porock, Davina
Harwood, Rowan H
author_facet Goldberg, Sarah E
Bradshaw, Lucy E
Kearney, Fiona C
Russell, Catherine
Whittamore, Kathy H
Foster, Pippa E R
Mamza, Jil
Gladman, John R F
Jones, Rob G
Lewis, Sarah A
Porock, Davina
Harwood, Rowan H
author_sort Goldberg, Sarah E
collection PubMed
description Objective To develop and evaluate a best practice model of general hospital acute medical care for older people with cognitive impairment. Design Randomised controlled trial, adapted to take account of constraints imposed by a busy acute medical admission system. Setting Large acute general hospital in the United Kingdom. Participants 600 patients aged over 65 admitted for acute medical care, identified as “confused” on admission. Interventions Participants were randomised to a specialist medical and mental health unit, designed to deliver best practice care for people with delirium or dementia, or to standard care (acute geriatric or general medical wards). Features of the specialist unit included joint staffing by medical and mental health professionals; enhanced staff training in delirium, dementia, and person centred dementia care; provision of organised purposeful activity; environmental modification to meet the needs of those with cognitive impairment; delirium prevention; and a proactive and inclusive approach to family carers. Main outcome measures Primary outcome: number of days spent at home over the 90 days after randomisation. Secondary outcomes: structured non-participant observations to ascertain patients’ experiences; satisfaction of family carers with hospital care. When possible, outcome assessment was blind to allocation. Results There was no significant difference in days spent at home between the specialist unit and standard care groups (median 51 v 45 days, 95% confidence interval for difference −12 to 24; P=0.3). Median index hospital stay was 11 versus 11 days, mortality 22% versus 25% (−9% to 4%), readmission 32% versus 35% (−10% to 5%), and new admission to care home 20% versus 28% (−16% to 0) for the specialist unit and standard care groups, respectively. Patients returning home spent a median of 70.5 versus 71.0 days at home (−6.0 to 6.5). Patients on the specialist unit spent significantly more time with positive mood or engagement (79% v 68%, 2% to 20%; P=0.03) and experienced more staff interactions that met emotional and psychological needs (median 4 v 1 per observation; P<0.001). More family carers were satisfied with care (overall 91% v 83%, 2% to 15%; P=0.004), and severe dissatisfaction was reduced (5% v 10%, −10% to 0%; P=0.05). Conclusions Specialist care for people with delirium and dementia improved the experience of patients and satisfaction of carers, but there were no convincing benefits in health status or service use. Patients’ experience and carers’ satisfaction might be more appropriate measures of success for frail older people approaching the end of life. Trial registration Clinical Trials NCT01136148
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3698942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36989422013-07-03 Care in specialist medical and mental health unit compared with standard care for older people with cognitive impairment admitted to general hospital: randomised controlled trial (NIHR TEAM trial) Goldberg, Sarah E Bradshaw, Lucy E Kearney, Fiona C Russell, Catherine Whittamore, Kathy H Foster, Pippa E R Mamza, Jil Gladman, John R F Jones, Rob G Lewis, Sarah A Porock, Davina Harwood, Rowan H BMJ Research Objective To develop and evaluate a best practice model of general hospital acute medical care for older people with cognitive impairment. Design Randomised controlled trial, adapted to take account of constraints imposed by a busy acute medical admission system. Setting Large acute general hospital in the United Kingdom. Participants 600 patients aged over 65 admitted for acute medical care, identified as “confused” on admission. Interventions Participants were randomised to a specialist medical and mental health unit, designed to deliver best practice care for people with delirium or dementia, or to standard care (acute geriatric or general medical wards). Features of the specialist unit included joint staffing by medical and mental health professionals; enhanced staff training in delirium, dementia, and person centred dementia care; provision of organised purposeful activity; environmental modification to meet the needs of those with cognitive impairment; delirium prevention; and a proactive and inclusive approach to family carers. Main outcome measures Primary outcome: number of days spent at home over the 90 days after randomisation. Secondary outcomes: structured non-participant observations to ascertain patients’ experiences; satisfaction of family carers with hospital care. When possible, outcome assessment was blind to allocation. Results There was no significant difference in days spent at home between the specialist unit and standard care groups (median 51 v 45 days, 95% confidence interval for difference −12 to 24; P=0.3). Median index hospital stay was 11 versus 11 days, mortality 22% versus 25% (−9% to 4%), readmission 32% versus 35% (−10% to 5%), and new admission to care home 20% versus 28% (−16% to 0) for the specialist unit and standard care groups, respectively. Patients returning home spent a median of 70.5 versus 71.0 days at home (−6.0 to 6.5). Patients on the specialist unit spent significantly more time with positive mood or engagement (79% v 68%, 2% to 20%; P=0.03) and experienced more staff interactions that met emotional and psychological needs (median 4 v 1 per observation; P<0.001). More family carers were satisfied with care (overall 91% v 83%, 2% to 15%; P=0.004), and severe dissatisfaction was reduced (5% v 10%, −10% to 0%; P=0.05). Conclusions Specialist care for people with delirium and dementia improved the experience of patients and satisfaction of carers, but there were no convincing benefits in health status or service use. Patients’ experience and carers’ satisfaction might be more appropriate measures of success for frail older people approaching the end of life. Trial registration Clinical Trials NCT01136148 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2013-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3698942/ /pubmed/23819964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f4132 Text en © Goldberg et al 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Goldberg, Sarah E
Bradshaw, Lucy E
Kearney, Fiona C
Russell, Catherine
Whittamore, Kathy H
Foster, Pippa E R
Mamza, Jil
Gladman, John R F
Jones, Rob G
Lewis, Sarah A
Porock, Davina
Harwood, Rowan H
Care in specialist medical and mental health unit compared with standard care for older people with cognitive impairment admitted to general hospital: randomised controlled trial (NIHR TEAM trial)
title Care in specialist medical and mental health unit compared with standard care for older people with cognitive impairment admitted to general hospital: randomised controlled trial (NIHR TEAM trial)
title_full Care in specialist medical and mental health unit compared with standard care for older people with cognitive impairment admitted to general hospital: randomised controlled trial (NIHR TEAM trial)
title_fullStr Care in specialist medical and mental health unit compared with standard care for older people with cognitive impairment admitted to general hospital: randomised controlled trial (NIHR TEAM trial)
title_full_unstemmed Care in specialist medical and mental health unit compared with standard care for older people with cognitive impairment admitted to general hospital: randomised controlled trial (NIHR TEAM trial)
title_short Care in specialist medical and mental health unit compared with standard care for older people with cognitive impairment admitted to general hospital: randomised controlled trial (NIHR TEAM trial)
title_sort care in specialist medical and mental health unit compared with standard care for older people with cognitive impairment admitted to general hospital: randomised controlled trial (nihr team trial)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3698942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23819964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f4132
work_keys_str_mv AT goldbergsarahe careinspecialistmedicalandmentalhealthunitcomparedwithstandardcareforolderpeoplewithcognitiveimpairmentadmittedtogeneralhospitalrandomisedcontrolledtrialnihrteamtrial
AT bradshawlucye careinspecialistmedicalandmentalhealthunitcomparedwithstandardcareforolderpeoplewithcognitiveimpairmentadmittedtogeneralhospitalrandomisedcontrolledtrialnihrteamtrial
AT kearneyfionac careinspecialistmedicalandmentalhealthunitcomparedwithstandardcareforolderpeoplewithcognitiveimpairmentadmittedtogeneralhospitalrandomisedcontrolledtrialnihrteamtrial
AT russellcatherine careinspecialistmedicalandmentalhealthunitcomparedwithstandardcareforolderpeoplewithcognitiveimpairmentadmittedtogeneralhospitalrandomisedcontrolledtrialnihrteamtrial
AT whittamorekathyh careinspecialistmedicalandmentalhealthunitcomparedwithstandardcareforolderpeoplewithcognitiveimpairmentadmittedtogeneralhospitalrandomisedcontrolledtrialnihrteamtrial
AT fosterpippaer careinspecialistmedicalandmentalhealthunitcomparedwithstandardcareforolderpeoplewithcognitiveimpairmentadmittedtogeneralhospitalrandomisedcontrolledtrialnihrteamtrial
AT mamzajil careinspecialistmedicalandmentalhealthunitcomparedwithstandardcareforolderpeoplewithcognitiveimpairmentadmittedtogeneralhospitalrandomisedcontrolledtrialnihrteamtrial
AT gladmanjohnrf careinspecialistmedicalandmentalhealthunitcomparedwithstandardcareforolderpeoplewithcognitiveimpairmentadmittedtogeneralhospitalrandomisedcontrolledtrialnihrteamtrial
AT jonesrobg careinspecialistmedicalandmentalhealthunitcomparedwithstandardcareforolderpeoplewithcognitiveimpairmentadmittedtogeneralhospitalrandomisedcontrolledtrialnihrteamtrial
AT lewissaraha careinspecialistmedicalandmentalhealthunitcomparedwithstandardcareforolderpeoplewithcognitiveimpairmentadmittedtogeneralhospitalrandomisedcontrolledtrialnihrteamtrial
AT porockdavina careinspecialistmedicalandmentalhealthunitcomparedwithstandardcareforolderpeoplewithcognitiveimpairmentadmittedtogeneralhospitalrandomisedcontrolledtrialnihrteamtrial
AT harwoodrowanh careinspecialistmedicalandmentalhealthunitcomparedwithstandardcareforolderpeoplewithcognitiveimpairmentadmittedtogeneralhospitalrandomisedcontrolledtrialnihrteamtrial