Cargando…

Netilmicin/dexamethasone fixed combination in the treatment of conjunctival inflammation

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of 0.1% dexamethasone/0.3% netilmicin (Netildex), with that of 0.1% dexamethasone/0.3% tobramycin (Tobradex) in the treatment of external ocular inflammation requiring antibiotic therapy. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind study, 139 subjects with c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faraldi, Francesco, Papa, Vincenzo, Rasà, Daria, Santoro, Debora, Russo, Simona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3699304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23836952
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S44455
_version_ 1782275365405720576
author Faraldi, Francesco
Papa, Vincenzo
Rasà, Daria
Santoro, Debora
Russo, Simona
author_facet Faraldi, Francesco
Papa, Vincenzo
Rasà, Daria
Santoro, Debora
Russo, Simona
author_sort Faraldi, Francesco
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of 0.1% dexamethasone/0.3% netilmicin (Netildex), with that of 0.1% dexamethasone/0.3% tobramycin (Tobradex) in the treatment of external ocular inflammation requiring antibiotic therapy. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind study, 139 subjects with conjunctival inflammation associated with signs of ocular infection were treated with Netildex (n = 71) or Tobradex (n = 68) four times daily for 6 days. The primary efficacy analysis was based on the percentage of patients with at least a 50% decrease in conjunctival hyperemia at the endpoint visit (Day 6 [± 1]) with respect to baseline (responder rate). An equivalence margin of 20% was set for this study. A follow-up visit was performed at Day 14 (± 1). Other efficacy parameters were: conjunctival edema, conjunctival discharge, lid hyperemia, lid edema, presence of ocular infection, and symptoms of ocular discomfort. Safety evaluations included intraocular pressure, visual acuity, and adverse events. RESULTS: At Day 6, a decrease of conjunctival hyperemia was observed in 87.3% and 90.9% of the patients treated with Netildex and Tobradex, respectively. The 95% confidence interval for the difference between groups (−15.3 ÷ 8.0) satisfied the equivalence hypothesis. Subjects treated with Netildex had a better control of lid hyperemia (P = 0.016), tearing (P = 0.001), burning (P = 0.007), and stinging (P = 0.004). No adverse reactions were observed during the study except one case of keratitis in the Tobradex group. CONCLUSION: Netildex was as effective and safe as Tobradex in reducing signs and symptoms in patients with conjunctival inflammation when ocular infection was suspected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3699304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36993042013-07-08 Netilmicin/dexamethasone fixed combination in the treatment of conjunctival inflammation Faraldi, Francesco Papa, Vincenzo Rasà, Daria Santoro, Debora Russo, Simona Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of 0.1% dexamethasone/0.3% netilmicin (Netildex), with that of 0.1% dexamethasone/0.3% tobramycin (Tobradex) in the treatment of external ocular inflammation requiring antibiotic therapy. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind study, 139 subjects with conjunctival inflammation associated with signs of ocular infection were treated with Netildex (n = 71) or Tobradex (n = 68) four times daily for 6 days. The primary efficacy analysis was based on the percentage of patients with at least a 50% decrease in conjunctival hyperemia at the endpoint visit (Day 6 [± 1]) with respect to baseline (responder rate). An equivalence margin of 20% was set for this study. A follow-up visit was performed at Day 14 (± 1). Other efficacy parameters were: conjunctival edema, conjunctival discharge, lid hyperemia, lid edema, presence of ocular infection, and symptoms of ocular discomfort. Safety evaluations included intraocular pressure, visual acuity, and adverse events. RESULTS: At Day 6, a decrease of conjunctival hyperemia was observed in 87.3% and 90.9% of the patients treated with Netildex and Tobradex, respectively. The 95% confidence interval for the difference between groups (−15.3 ÷ 8.0) satisfied the equivalence hypothesis. Subjects treated with Netildex had a better control of lid hyperemia (P = 0.016), tearing (P = 0.001), burning (P = 0.007), and stinging (P = 0.004). No adverse reactions were observed during the study except one case of keratitis in the Tobradex group. CONCLUSION: Netildex was as effective and safe as Tobradex in reducing signs and symptoms in patients with conjunctival inflammation when ocular infection was suspected. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3699304/ /pubmed/23836952 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S44455 Text en © 2013 Faraldi et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Faraldi, Francesco
Papa, Vincenzo
Rasà, Daria
Santoro, Debora
Russo, Simona
Netilmicin/dexamethasone fixed combination in the treatment of conjunctival inflammation
title Netilmicin/dexamethasone fixed combination in the treatment of conjunctival inflammation
title_full Netilmicin/dexamethasone fixed combination in the treatment of conjunctival inflammation
title_fullStr Netilmicin/dexamethasone fixed combination in the treatment of conjunctival inflammation
title_full_unstemmed Netilmicin/dexamethasone fixed combination in the treatment of conjunctival inflammation
title_short Netilmicin/dexamethasone fixed combination in the treatment of conjunctival inflammation
title_sort netilmicin/dexamethasone fixed combination in the treatment of conjunctival inflammation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3699304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23836952
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S44455
work_keys_str_mv AT faraldifrancesco netilmicindexamethasonefixedcombinationinthetreatmentofconjunctivalinflammation
AT papavincenzo netilmicindexamethasonefixedcombinationinthetreatmentofconjunctivalinflammation
AT rasadaria netilmicindexamethasonefixedcombinationinthetreatmentofconjunctivalinflammation
AT santorodebora netilmicindexamethasonefixedcombinationinthetreatmentofconjunctivalinflammation
AT russosimona netilmicindexamethasonefixedcombinationinthetreatmentofconjunctivalinflammation