Cargando…
Netilmicin/dexamethasone fixed combination in the treatment of conjunctival inflammation
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of 0.1% dexamethasone/0.3% netilmicin (Netildex), with that of 0.1% dexamethasone/0.3% tobramycin (Tobradex) in the treatment of external ocular inflammation requiring antibiotic therapy. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind study, 139 subjects with c...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3699304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23836952 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S44455 |
_version_ | 1782275365405720576 |
---|---|
author | Faraldi, Francesco Papa, Vincenzo Rasà, Daria Santoro, Debora Russo, Simona |
author_facet | Faraldi, Francesco Papa, Vincenzo Rasà, Daria Santoro, Debora Russo, Simona |
author_sort | Faraldi, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of 0.1% dexamethasone/0.3% netilmicin (Netildex), with that of 0.1% dexamethasone/0.3% tobramycin (Tobradex) in the treatment of external ocular inflammation requiring antibiotic therapy. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind study, 139 subjects with conjunctival inflammation associated with signs of ocular infection were treated with Netildex (n = 71) or Tobradex (n = 68) four times daily for 6 days. The primary efficacy analysis was based on the percentage of patients with at least a 50% decrease in conjunctival hyperemia at the endpoint visit (Day 6 [± 1]) with respect to baseline (responder rate). An equivalence margin of 20% was set for this study. A follow-up visit was performed at Day 14 (± 1). Other efficacy parameters were: conjunctival edema, conjunctival discharge, lid hyperemia, lid edema, presence of ocular infection, and symptoms of ocular discomfort. Safety evaluations included intraocular pressure, visual acuity, and adverse events. RESULTS: At Day 6, a decrease of conjunctival hyperemia was observed in 87.3% and 90.9% of the patients treated with Netildex and Tobradex, respectively. The 95% confidence interval for the difference between groups (−15.3 ÷ 8.0) satisfied the equivalence hypothesis. Subjects treated with Netildex had a better control of lid hyperemia (P = 0.016), tearing (P = 0.001), burning (P = 0.007), and stinging (P = 0.004). No adverse reactions were observed during the study except one case of keratitis in the Tobradex group. CONCLUSION: Netildex was as effective and safe as Tobradex in reducing signs and symptoms in patients with conjunctival inflammation when ocular infection was suspected. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3699304 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36993042013-07-08 Netilmicin/dexamethasone fixed combination in the treatment of conjunctival inflammation Faraldi, Francesco Papa, Vincenzo Rasà, Daria Santoro, Debora Russo, Simona Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of 0.1% dexamethasone/0.3% netilmicin (Netildex), with that of 0.1% dexamethasone/0.3% tobramycin (Tobradex) in the treatment of external ocular inflammation requiring antibiotic therapy. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind study, 139 subjects with conjunctival inflammation associated with signs of ocular infection were treated with Netildex (n = 71) or Tobradex (n = 68) four times daily for 6 days. The primary efficacy analysis was based on the percentage of patients with at least a 50% decrease in conjunctival hyperemia at the endpoint visit (Day 6 [± 1]) with respect to baseline (responder rate). An equivalence margin of 20% was set for this study. A follow-up visit was performed at Day 14 (± 1). Other efficacy parameters were: conjunctival edema, conjunctival discharge, lid hyperemia, lid edema, presence of ocular infection, and symptoms of ocular discomfort. Safety evaluations included intraocular pressure, visual acuity, and adverse events. RESULTS: At Day 6, a decrease of conjunctival hyperemia was observed in 87.3% and 90.9% of the patients treated with Netildex and Tobradex, respectively. The 95% confidence interval for the difference between groups (−15.3 ÷ 8.0) satisfied the equivalence hypothesis. Subjects treated with Netildex had a better control of lid hyperemia (P = 0.016), tearing (P = 0.001), burning (P = 0.007), and stinging (P = 0.004). No adverse reactions were observed during the study except one case of keratitis in the Tobradex group. CONCLUSION: Netildex was as effective and safe as Tobradex in reducing signs and symptoms in patients with conjunctival inflammation when ocular infection was suspected. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3699304/ /pubmed/23836952 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S44455 Text en © 2013 Faraldi et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Faraldi, Francesco Papa, Vincenzo Rasà, Daria Santoro, Debora Russo, Simona Netilmicin/dexamethasone fixed combination in the treatment of conjunctival inflammation |
title | Netilmicin/dexamethasone fixed combination in the treatment of conjunctival inflammation |
title_full | Netilmicin/dexamethasone fixed combination in the treatment of conjunctival inflammation |
title_fullStr | Netilmicin/dexamethasone fixed combination in the treatment of conjunctival inflammation |
title_full_unstemmed | Netilmicin/dexamethasone fixed combination in the treatment of conjunctival inflammation |
title_short | Netilmicin/dexamethasone fixed combination in the treatment of conjunctival inflammation |
title_sort | netilmicin/dexamethasone fixed combination in the treatment of conjunctival inflammation |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3699304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23836952 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S44455 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT faraldifrancesco netilmicindexamethasonefixedcombinationinthetreatmentofconjunctivalinflammation AT papavincenzo netilmicindexamethasonefixedcombinationinthetreatmentofconjunctivalinflammation AT rasadaria netilmicindexamethasonefixedcombinationinthetreatmentofconjunctivalinflammation AT santorodebora netilmicindexamethasonefixedcombinationinthetreatmentofconjunctivalinflammation AT russosimona netilmicindexamethasonefixedcombinationinthetreatmentofconjunctivalinflammation |