Cargando…

Analysis of inter- and intrafraction accuracy of a commercial thermoplastic mask system used for image-guided particle radiation therapy

The present paper reports and discusses the results concerning both the inter- and intrafraction accuracy achievable combining the immobilization system employed in patients with head-and-neck, brain and skull base tumors with image guidance at our particle therapy center. Moreover, we investigated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amelio, Dante, Winter, Marcus, Habermehl, Daniel, Jäkel, Oliver, Debus, Jurgen, Combs, Stephanie E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3700507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23824130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrt038
_version_ 1782275520694583296
author Amelio, Dante
Winter, Marcus
Habermehl, Daniel
Jäkel, Oliver
Debus, Jurgen
Combs, Stephanie E.
author_facet Amelio, Dante
Winter, Marcus
Habermehl, Daniel
Jäkel, Oliver
Debus, Jurgen
Combs, Stephanie E.
author_sort Amelio, Dante
collection PubMed
description The present paper reports and discusses the results concerning both the inter- and intrafraction accuracy achievable combining the immobilization system employed in patients with head-and-neck, brain and skull base tumors with image guidance at our particle therapy center. Moreover, we investigated the influence of intrafraction time on positioning displacements. A total of 41 patients treated between January and July 2011 represented the study population. All the patients were immobilized with a tailored commercial thermoplastic head mask with standard head-neck rest (HeadSTEP(®), IT-V). Patient treatment position was verified by two orthogonal kilovoltage images acquired through a ceiling imaging robot (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The analysis of the applied daily corrections during the first treatment week before and after treatment delivery allowed the evaluation of the interfraction and intrafraction reproducibility of the thermoplastic mask, respectively. Concerning interfraction reproducibility, translational and rotational systematic errors (Σs) were ≤2.2 mm and 0.9º, respectively; translational and rotational random errors (σs) were ≤1.6 mm and 0.6º, respectively. Regarding the intrafraction accuracy translational and rotational Σs were ≤0.4 mm and 0.4º, respectively; translational and rotational σs were ≤ 0.5 mm and 0.3º, respectively. Concerning the time-intrafraction displacements correlation Pearson coefficient was 0.5 for treatment fractions with time between position checks less than or equal to median value, and 0.2 for those with time between position controls longer than the median figure. These results suggest that intrafractional patient motion is smaller than interfractional patient motion. Moreover, we can state that application of different imaging verification protocols translate into a relevant difference of accuracy for the same immobilization device. The magnitude of intrafraction displacements correlates with the time for short treatment sessions or during the early phase of long treatment delivery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3700507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37005072013-07-05 Analysis of inter- and intrafraction accuracy of a commercial thermoplastic mask system used for image-guided particle radiation therapy Amelio, Dante Winter, Marcus Habermehl, Daniel Jäkel, Oliver Debus, Jurgen Combs, Stephanie E. J Radiat Res Image-Guided Radiotherapy The present paper reports and discusses the results concerning both the inter- and intrafraction accuracy achievable combining the immobilization system employed in patients with head-and-neck, brain and skull base tumors with image guidance at our particle therapy center. Moreover, we investigated the influence of intrafraction time on positioning displacements. A total of 41 patients treated between January and July 2011 represented the study population. All the patients were immobilized with a tailored commercial thermoplastic head mask with standard head-neck rest (HeadSTEP(®), IT-V). Patient treatment position was verified by two orthogonal kilovoltage images acquired through a ceiling imaging robot (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The analysis of the applied daily corrections during the first treatment week before and after treatment delivery allowed the evaluation of the interfraction and intrafraction reproducibility of the thermoplastic mask, respectively. Concerning interfraction reproducibility, translational and rotational systematic errors (Σs) were ≤2.2 mm and 0.9º, respectively; translational and rotational random errors (σs) were ≤1.6 mm and 0.6º, respectively. Regarding the intrafraction accuracy translational and rotational Σs were ≤0.4 mm and 0.4º, respectively; translational and rotational σs were ≤ 0.5 mm and 0.3º, respectively. Concerning the time-intrafraction displacements correlation Pearson coefficient was 0.5 for treatment fractions with time between position checks less than or equal to median value, and 0.2 for those with time between position controls longer than the median figure. These results suggest that intrafractional patient motion is smaller than interfractional patient motion. Moreover, we can state that application of different imaging verification protocols translate into a relevant difference of accuracy for the same immobilization device. The magnitude of intrafraction displacements correlates with the time for short treatment sessions or during the early phase of long treatment delivery. Oxford University Press 2013-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3700507/ /pubmed/23824130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrt038 Text en © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
spellingShingle Image-Guided Radiotherapy
Amelio, Dante
Winter, Marcus
Habermehl, Daniel
Jäkel, Oliver
Debus, Jurgen
Combs, Stephanie E.
Analysis of inter- and intrafraction accuracy of a commercial thermoplastic mask system used for image-guided particle radiation therapy
title Analysis of inter- and intrafraction accuracy of a commercial thermoplastic mask system used for image-guided particle radiation therapy
title_full Analysis of inter- and intrafraction accuracy of a commercial thermoplastic mask system used for image-guided particle radiation therapy
title_fullStr Analysis of inter- and intrafraction accuracy of a commercial thermoplastic mask system used for image-guided particle radiation therapy
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of inter- and intrafraction accuracy of a commercial thermoplastic mask system used for image-guided particle radiation therapy
title_short Analysis of inter- and intrafraction accuracy of a commercial thermoplastic mask system used for image-guided particle radiation therapy
title_sort analysis of inter- and intrafraction accuracy of a commercial thermoplastic mask system used for image-guided particle radiation therapy
topic Image-Guided Radiotherapy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3700507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23824130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrt038
work_keys_str_mv AT ameliodante analysisofinterandintrafractionaccuracyofacommercialthermoplasticmasksystemusedforimageguidedparticleradiationtherapy
AT wintermarcus analysisofinterandintrafractionaccuracyofacommercialthermoplasticmasksystemusedforimageguidedparticleradiationtherapy
AT habermehldaniel analysisofinterandintrafractionaccuracyofacommercialthermoplasticmasksystemusedforimageguidedparticleradiationtherapy
AT jakeloliver analysisofinterandintrafractionaccuracyofacommercialthermoplasticmasksystemusedforimageguidedparticleradiationtherapy
AT debusjurgen analysisofinterandintrafractionaccuracyofacommercialthermoplasticmasksystemusedforimageguidedparticleradiationtherapy
AT combsstephaniee analysisofinterandintrafractionaccuracyofacommercialthermoplasticmasksystemusedforimageguidedparticleradiationtherapy