Cargando…

QTL fine mapping with Bayes C(π): a simulation study

BACKGROUND: Accurate QTL mapping is a prerequisite in the search for causative mutations. Bayesian genomic selection models that analyse many markers simultaneously should provide more accurate QTL detection results than single-marker models. Our objectives were to (a) evaluate by simulation the inf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Berg, Irene, Fritz, Sébastien, Boichard, Didier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3700753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23782975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-45-19
_version_ 1782275528679489536
author van den Berg, Irene
Fritz, Sébastien
Boichard, Didier
author_facet van den Berg, Irene
Fritz, Sébastien
Boichard, Didier
author_sort van den Berg, Irene
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate QTL mapping is a prerequisite in the search for causative mutations. Bayesian genomic selection models that analyse many markers simultaneously should provide more accurate QTL detection results than single-marker models. Our objectives were to (a) evaluate by simulation the influence of heritability, number of QTL and number of records on the accuracy of QTL mapping with Bayes Cπ and Bayes C; (b) estimate the QTL status (homozygous vs. heterozygous) of the individuals analysed. This study focussed on the ten largest detected QTL, assuming they are candidates for further characterization. METHODS: Our simulations were based on a true dairy cattle population genotyped for 38 277 phased markers. Some of these markers were considered biallelic QTL and used to generate corresponding phenotypes. Different numbers of records (4387 and 1500), heritability values (0.1, 0.4 and 0.7) and numbers of QTL (10, 100 and 1000) were studied. QTL detection was based on the posterior inclusion probability for individual markers, or on the sum of the posterior inclusion probabilities for consecutive markers, estimated using Bayes C or Bayes Cπ. The QTL status of the individuals was derived from the contrast between the sums of the SNP allelic effects of their chromosomal segments. RESULTS: The proportion of markers with null effect (π) frequently did not reach convergence, leading to poor results for Bayes Cπ in QTL detection. Fixing π led to better results. Detection of the largest QTL was most accurate for medium to high heritability, for low to moderate numbers of QTL, and with a large number of records. The QTL status was accurately inferred when the distribution of the contrast between chromosomal segment effects was bimodal. CONCLUSIONS: QTL detection is feasible with Bayes C. For QTL detection, it is recommended to use a large dataset and to focus on highly heritable traits and on the largest QTL. QTL statuses were inferred based on the distribution of the contrast between chromosomal segment effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3700753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37007532013-07-10 QTL fine mapping with Bayes C(π): a simulation study van den Berg, Irene Fritz, Sébastien Boichard, Didier Genet Sel Evol Research BACKGROUND: Accurate QTL mapping is a prerequisite in the search for causative mutations. Bayesian genomic selection models that analyse many markers simultaneously should provide more accurate QTL detection results than single-marker models. Our objectives were to (a) evaluate by simulation the influence of heritability, number of QTL and number of records on the accuracy of QTL mapping with Bayes Cπ and Bayes C; (b) estimate the QTL status (homozygous vs. heterozygous) of the individuals analysed. This study focussed on the ten largest detected QTL, assuming they are candidates for further characterization. METHODS: Our simulations were based on a true dairy cattle population genotyped for 38 277 phased markers. Some of these markers were considered biallelic QTL and used to generate corresponding phenotypes. Different numbers of records (4387 and 1500), heritability values (0.1, 0.4 and 0.7) and numbers of QTL (10, 100 and 1000) were studied. QTL detection was based on the posterior inclusion probability for individual markers, or on the sum of the posterior inclusion probabilities for consecutive markers, estimated using Bayes C or Bayes Cπ. The QTL status of the individuals was derived from the contrast between the sums of the SNP allelic effects of their chromosomal segments. RESULTS: The proportion of markers with null effect (π) frequently did not reach convergence, leading to poor results for Bayes Cπ in QTL detection. Fixing π led to better results. Detection of the largest QTL was most accurate for medium to high heritability, for low to moderate numbers of QTL, and with a large number of records. The QTL status was accurately inferred when the distribution of the contrast between chromosomal segment effects was bimodal. CONCLUSIONS: QTL detection is feasible with Bayes C. For QTL detection, it is recommended to use a large dataset and to focus on highly heritable traits and on the largest QTL. QTL statuses were inferred based on the distribution of the contrast between chromosomal segment effects. BioMed Central 2013-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3700753/ /pubmed/23782975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-45-19 Text en Copyright © 2013 van den Berg et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
van den Berg, Irene
Fritz, Sébastien
Boichard, Didier
QTL fine mapping with Bayes C(π): a simulation study
title QTL fine mapping with Bayes C(π): a simulation study
title_full QTL fine mapping with Bayes C(π): a simulation study
title_fullStr QTL fine mapping with Bayes C(π): a simulation study
title_full_unstemmed QTL fine mapping with Bayes C(π): a simulation study
title_short QTL fine mapping with Bayes C(π): a simulation study
title_sort qtl fine mapping with bayes c(π): a simulation study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3700753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23782975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-45-19
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenbergirene qtlfinemappingwithbayescpasimulationstudy
AT fritzsebastien qtlfinemappingwithbayescpasimulationstudy
AT boicharddidier qtlfinemappingwithbayescpasimulationstudy