Cargando…

The case for investing in family planning in the Pacific: costs and benefits of reducing unmet need for contraception in Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands

BACKGROUND: Unmet need for family planning in the Pacific is among the highest in the world. Better understanding of required investments and associated benefits of increased access to family planning in the Pacific may assist prioritisation and funding. METHODS: We modelled the costs and associated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kennedy, Elissa C, Mackesy-Buckley, Sean, Subramaniam, Sumi, Demmke, Andreas, Latu, Rufina, Robertson, Annette Sachs, Tiban, Kabwea, Tokon, Apisai, Luchters, Stanley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3700798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23758783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-10-30
_version_ 1782275535723823104
author Kennedy, Elissa C
Mackesy-Buckley, Sean
Subramaniam, Sumi
Demmke, Andreas
Latu, Rufina
Robertson, Annette Sachs
Tiban, Kabwea
Tokon, Apisai
Luchters, Stanley
author_facet Kennedy, Elissa C
Mackesy-Buckley, Sean
Subramaniam, Sumi
Demmke, Andreas
Latu, Rufina
Robertson, Annette Sachs
Tiban, Kabwea
Tokon, Apisai
Luchters, Stanley
author_sort Kennedy, Elissa C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Unmet need for family planning in the Pacific is among the highest in the world. Better understanding of required investments and associated benefits of increased access to family planning in the Pacific may assist prioritisation and funding. METHODS: We modelled the costs and associated health, demographic and economic impacts of reducing unmet need for family planning between 2010–2025 in Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands. Baseline data were obtained from census reports, Demographic and Health Surveys, and UN agency reports. Using a demographic modelling program we compared a scenario of “no change in unmet need” with two distinct scenarios: 1) all family planning needs met by 2020; and, 2) all needs met by 2050. RESULTS: Meeting family planning needs by 2020 would increase prevalence of modern contraception in 2025 from 36.8 to 65.5% in Vanuatu and 28.5 to 37.6% in the Solomon Islands. Between 2010–2025 the average annual number of unintended pregnancies would decline by 68% in Vanuatu and 50% in the Solomon Islands, and high-risk births would fall by more than 20%, averting 2,573 maternal and infant deaths. Total fertility rates would fall from 4.1 to 2.2 in Vanuatu and 3.5 in the Solomon Islands, contributing to slowed population growth and lower dependency ratios. The direct cost of reducing unmet need by 2020 was estimated to be $5.19 million for Vanuatu and $3.36 million for the Solomon Islands between 2010–2025. Preventing unintended pregnancies would save $112 million in health and education expenditure. CONCLUSIONS: In small island developing states such as Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands, increasing investment in family planning would contribute to improved maternal and infant outcomes and substantial public sector savings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3700798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37007982013-07-10 The case for investing in family planning in the Pacific: costs and benefits of reducing unmet need for contraception in Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands Kennedy, Elissa C Mackesy-Buckley, Sean Subramaniam, Sumi Demmke, Andreas Latu, Rufina Robertson, Annette Sachs Tiban, Kabwea Tokon, Apisai Luchters, Stanley Reprod Health Research BACKGROUND: Unmet need for family planning in the Pacific is among the highest in the world. Better understanding of required investments and associated benefits of increased access to family planning in the Pacific may assist prioritisation and funding. METHODS: We modelled the costs and associated health, demographic and economic impacts of reducing unmet need for family planning between 2010–2025 in Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands. Baseline data were obtained from census reports, Demographic and Health Surveys, and UN agency reports. Using a demographic modelling program we compared a scenario of “no change in unmet need” with two distinct scenarios: 1) all family planning needs met by 2020; and, 2) all needs met by 2050. RESULTS: Meeting family planning needs by 2020 would increase prevalence of modern contraception in 2025 from 36.8 to 65.5% in Vanuatu and 28.5 to 37.6% in the Solomon Islands. Between 2010–2025 the average annual number of unintended pregnancies would decline by 68% in Vanuatu and 50% in the Solomon Islands, and high-risk births would fall by more than 20%, averting 2,573 maternal and infant deaths. Total fertility rates would fall from 4.1 to 2.2 in Vanuatu and 3.5 in the Solomon Islands, contributing to slowed population growth and lower dependency ratios. The direct cost of reducing unmet need by 2020 was estimated to be $5.19 million for Vanuatu and $3.36 million for the Solomon Islands between 2010–2025. Preventing unintended pregnancies would save $112 million in health and education expenditure. CONCLUSIONS: In small island developing states such as Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands, increasing investment in family planning would contribute to improved maternal and infant outcomes and substantial public sector savings. BioMed Central 2013-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3700798/ /pubmed/23758783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-10-30 Text en Copyright © 2013 Kennedy et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kennedy, Elissa C
Mackesy-Buckley, Sean
Subramaniam, Sumi
Demmke, Andreas
Latu, Rufina
Robertson, Annette Sachs
Tiban, Kabwea
Tokon, Apisai
Luchters, Stanley
The case for investing in family planning in the Pacific: costs and benefits of reducing unmet need for contraception in Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands
title The case for investing in family planning in the Pacific: costs and benefits of reducing unmet need for contraception in Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands
title_full The case for investing in family planning in the Pacific: costs and benefits of reducing unmet need for contraception in Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands
title_fullStr The case for investing in family planning in the Pacific: costs and benefits of reducing unmet need for contraception in Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands
title_full_unstemmed The case for investing in family planning in the Pacific: costs and benefits of reducing unmet need for contraception in Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands
title_short The case for investing in family planning in the Pacific: costs and benefits of reducing unmet need for contraception in Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands
title_sort case for investing in family planning in the pacific: costs and benefits of reducing unmet need for contraception in vanuatu and the solomon islands
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3700798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23758783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-10-30
work_keys_str_mv AT kennedyelissac thecaseforinvestinginfamilyplanninginthepacificcostsandbenefitsofreducingunmetneedforcontraceptioninvanuatuandthesolomonislands
AT mackesybuckleysean thecaseforinvestinginfamilyplanninginthepacificcostsandbenefitsofreducingunmetneedforcontraceptioninvanuatuandthesolomonislands
AT subramaniamsumi thecaseforinvestinginfamilyplanninginthepacificcostsandbenefitsofreducingunmetneedforcontraceptioninvanuatuandthesolomonislands
AT demmkeandreas thecaseforinvestinginfamilyplanninginthepacificcostsandbenefitsofreducingunmetneedforcontraceptioninvanuatuandthesolomonislands
AT laturufina thecaseforinvestinginfamilyplanninginthepacificcostsandbenefitsofreducingunmetneedforcontraceptioninvanuatuandthesolomonislands
AT robertsonannettesachs thecaseforinvestinginfamilyplanninginthepacificcostsandbenefitsofreducingunmetneedforcontraceptioninvanuatuandthesolomonislands
AT tibankabwea thecaseforinvestinginfamilyplanninginthepacificcostsandbenefitsofreducingunmetneedforcontraceptioninvanuatuandthesolomonislands
AT tokonapisai thecaseforinvestinginfamilyplanninginthepacificcostsandbenefitsofreducingunmetneedforcontraceptioninvanuatuandthesolomonislands
AT luchtersstanley thecaseforinvestinginfamilyplanninginthepacificcostsandbenefitsofreducingunmetneedforcontraceptioninvanuatuandthesolomonislands
AT kennedyelissac caseforinvestinginfamilyplanninginthepacificcostsandbenefitsofreducingunmetneedforcontraceptioninvanuatuandthesolomonislands
AT mackesybuckleysean caseforinvestinginfamilyplanninginthepacificcostsandbenefitsofreducingunmetneedforcontraceptioninvanuatuandthesolomonislands
AT subramaniamsumi caseforinvestinginfamilyplanninginthepacificcostsandbenefitsofreducingunmetneedforcontraceptioninvanuatuandthesolomonislands
AT demmkeandreas caseforinvestinginfamilyplanninginthepacificcostsandbenefitsofreducingunmetneedforcontraceptioninvanuatuandthesolomonislands
AT laturufina caseforinvestinginfamilyplanninginthepacificcostsandbenefitsofreducingunmetneedforcontraceptioninvanuatuandthesolomonislands
AT robertsonannettesachs caseforinvestinginfamilyplanninginthepacificcostsandbenefitsofreducingunmetneedforcontraceptioninvanuatuandthesolomonislands
AT tibankabwea caseforinvestinginfamilyplanninginthepacificcostsandbenefitsofreducingunmetneedforcontraceptioninvanuatuandthesolomonislands
AT tokonapisai caseforinvestinginfamilyplanninginthepacificcostsandbenefitsofreducingunmetneedforcontraceptioninvanuatuandthesolomonislands
AT luchtersstanley caseforinvestinginfamilyplanninginthepacificcostsandbenefitsofreducingunmetneedforcontraceptioninvanuatuandthesolomonislands