Cargando…
Functional microbial diversity explains groundwater chemistry in a pristine aquifer
BACKGROUND: The diverse microbial populations that inhabit pristine aquifers are known to catalyze critical in situ biogeochemical reactions, yet little is known about how the structure and diversity of this subsurface community correlates with and impacts upon groundwater chemistry. Herein we exami...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3700874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23800252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-13-146 |
_version_ | 1782275551227019264 |
---|---|
author | Flynn, Theodore M Sanford, Robert A Ryu, Hodon Bethke, Craig M Levine, Audrey D Ashbolt, Nicholas J Santo Domingo, Jorge W |
author_facet | Flynn, Theodore M Sanford, Robert A Ryu, Hodon Bethke, Craig M Levine, Audrey D Ashbolt, Nicholas J Santo Domingo, Jorge W |
author_sort | Flynn, Theodore M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The diverse microbial populations that inhabit pristine aquifers are known to catalyze critical in situ biogeochemical reactions, yet little is known about how the structure and diversity of this subsurface community correlates with and impacts upon groundwater chemistry. Herein we examine 8,786 bacterial and 8,166 archaeal 16S rRNA gene sequences from an array of monitoring wells in the Mahomet aquifer of east-central Illinois. Using multivariate statistical analyses we provide a comparative analysis of the relationship between groundwater chemistry and the microbial communities attached to aquifer sediment along with those suspended in groundwater. RESULTS: Statistical analyses of 16S rRNA gene sequences showed a clear distinction between attached and suspended communities; with iron-reducing bacteria far more abundant in attached samples than suspended, while archaeal clones related to groups associated with anaerobic methane oxidation and deep subsurface gold mines (ANME-2D and SAGMEG-1, respectively) distinguished the suspended community from the attached. Within the attached bacterial community, cloned sequences most closely related to the sulfate-reducing Desulfobacter and Desulfobulbus genera represented 20% of the bacterial community in wells where the concentration of sulfate in groundwater was high (> 0.2 mM), compared to only 3% in wells with less sulfate. Sequences related to the genus Geobacter, a genus containing ferric-iron reducers, were of nearly equal abundance (15%) to the sulfate reducers under high sulfate conditions, however their relative abundance increased to 34% when sulfate concentrations were < 0.03 mM. Also, in areas where sulfate concentrations were <0.03 mM, archaeal 16S rRNA gene sequences similar to those found in methanogens such as Methanosarcina and Methanosaeta comprised 73–80% of the community, and dissolved CH(4) ranged between 220 and 1240 μM in these groundwaters. In contrast, methanogens (and their product, CH(4)) were nearly absent in samples collected from groundwater samples with > 0.2 mM sulfate. In the suspended fraction of wells where the concentration of sulfate was between 0.03 and 0.2 mM, the archaeal community was dominated by sequences most closely related to the ANME-2D, a group of archaea known for anaerobically oxidizing methane. Based on available energy (∆G(A)) estimations, results varied little for both sulfate reduction and methanogenesis throughout all wells studied, but could favor anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) in wells containing minimal sulfate and dihydrogen, suggesting AOM coupled with H(2)-oxidizing organisms such as sulfate or iron reducers could be an important pathway occurring in the Mahomet aquifer. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results show several distinct factors control the composition of microbial communities in the Mahomet aquifer. Bacteria that respire insoluble substrates such as iron oxides, i.e. Geobacter, comprise a greater abundance of the attached community than the suspended regardless of groundwater chemistry. Differences in community structure driven by the concentration of sulfate point to a clear link between the availability of substrate and the abundance of certain functional groups, particularly iron reducers, sulfate reducers, methanogens, and methanotrophs. Integrating both geochemical and microbiological observations suggest that the relationships between these functional groups could be driven in part by mutualism, especially between ferric-iron and sulfate reducers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3700874 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37008742013-07-10 Functional microbial diversity explains groundwater chemistry in a pristine aquifer Flynn, Theodore M Sanford, Robert A Ryu, Hodon Bethke, Craig M Levine, Audrey D Ashbolt, Nicholas J Santo Domingo, Jorge W BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The diverse microbial populations that inhabit pristine aquifers are known to catalyze critical in situ biogeochemical reactions, yet little is known about how the structure and diversity of this subsurface community correlates with and impacts upon groundwater chemistry. Herein we examine 8,786 bacterial and 8,166 archaeal 16S rRNA gene sequences from an array of monitoring wells in the Mahomet aquifer of east-central Illinois. Using multivariate statistical analyses we provide a comparative analysis of the relationship between groundwater chemistry and the microbial communities attached to aquifer sediment along with those suspended in groundwater. RESULTS: Statistical analyses of 16S rRNA gene sequences showed a clear distinction between attached and suspended communities; with iron-reducing bacteria far more abundant in attached samples than suspended, while archaeal clones related to groups associated with anaerobic methane oxidation and deep subsurface gold mines (ANME-2D and SAGMEG-1, respectively) distinguished the suspended community from the attached. Within the attached bacterial community, cloned sequences most closely related to the sulfate-reducing Desulfobacter and Desulfobulbus genera represented 20% of the bacterial community in wells where the concentration of sulfate in groundwater was high (> 0.2 mM), compared to only 3% in wells with less sulfate. Sequences related to the genus Geobacter, a genus containing ferric-iron reducers, were of nearly equal abundance (15%) to the sulfate reducers under high sulfate conditions, however their relative abundance increased to 34% when sulfate concentrations were < 0.03 mM. Also, in areas where sulfate concentrations were <0.03 mM, archaeal 16S rRNA gene sequences similar to those found in methanogens such as Methanosarcina and Methanosaeta comprised 73–80% of the community, and dissolved CH(4) ranged between 220 and 1240 μM in these groundwaters. In contrast, methanogens (and their product, CH(4)) were nearly absent in samples collected from groundwater samples with > 0.2 mM sulfate. In the suspended fraction of wells where the concentration of sulfate was between 0.03 and 0.2 mM, the archaeal community was dominated by sequences most closely related to the ANME-2D, a group of archaea known for anaerobically oxidizing methane. Based on available energy (∆G(A)) estimations, results varied little for both sulfate reduction and methanogenesis throughout all wells studied, but could favor anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) in wells containing minimal sulfate and dihydrogen, suggesting AOM coupled with H(2)-oxidizing organisms such as sulfate or iron reducers could be an important pathway occurring in the Mahomet aquifer. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results show several distinct factors control the composition of microbial communities in the Mahomet aquifer. Bacteria that respire insoluble substrates such as iron oxides, i.e. Geobacter, comprise a greater abundance of the attached community than the suspended regardless of groundwater chemistry. Differences in community structure driven by the concentration of sulfate point to a clear link between the availability of substrate and the abundance of certain functional groups, particularly iron reducers, sulfate reducers, methanogens, and methanotrophs. Integrating both geochemical and microbiological observations suggest that the relationships between these functional groups could be driven in part by mutualism, especially between ferric-iron and sulfate reducers. BioMed Central 2013-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3700874/ /pubmed/23800252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-13-146 Text en Copyright © 2013 Flynn et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Flynn, Theodore M Sanford, Robert A Ryu, Hodon Bethke, Craig M Levine, Audrey D Ashbolt, Nicholas J Santo Domingo, Jorge W Functional microbial diversity explains groundwater chemistry in a pristine aquifer |
title | Functional microbial diversity explains groundwater chemistry in a pristine aquifer |
title_full | Functional microbial diversity explains groundwater chemistry in a pristine aquifer |
title_fullStr | Functional microbial diversity explains groundwater chemistry in a pristine aquifer |
title_full_unstemmed | Functional microbial diversity explains groundwater chemistry in a pristine aquifer |
title_short | Functional microbial diversity explains groundwater chemistry in a pristine aquifer |
title_sort | functional microbial diversity explains groundwater chemistry in a pristine aquifer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3700874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23800252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-13-146 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT flynntheodorem functionalmicrobialdiversityexplainsgroundwaterchemistryinapristineaquifer AT sanfordroberta functionalmicrobialdiversityexplainsgroundwaterchemistryinapristineaquifer AT ryuhodon functionalmicrobialdiversityexplainsgroundwaterchemistryinapristineaquifer AT bethkecraigm functionalmicrobialdiversityexplainsgroundwaterchemistryinapristineaquifer AT levineaudreyd functionalmicrobialdiversityexplainsgroundwaterchemistryinapristineaquifer AT ashboltnicholasj functionalmicrobialdiversityexplainsgroundwaterchemistryinapristineaquifer AT santodomingojorgew functionalmicrobialdiversityexplainsgroundwaterchemistryinapristineaquifer |