Cargando…

Assessing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of subcutaneous nerve stimulation in patients with predominant back pain due to failed back surgery syndrome (SubQStim study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Chronic radicular pain can be effectively treated with spinal cord stimulation, but this therapy is not always sufficient for chronic back pain. Subcutaneous nerve stimulation (SQS) refers to the placement of percutaneous leads in the subcutaneous tissue within the area of pain. Case ser...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eldabe, Sam, Kern, Michael, Peul, Wilco, Green, Colin, Winterfeldt, Kristi, Taylor, Rod S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3700888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23799929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-189
_version_ 1782275553377648640
author Eldabe, Sam
Kern, Michael
Peul, Wilco
Green, Colin
Winterfeldt, Kristi
Taylor, Rod S
author_facet Eldabe, Sam
Kern, Michael
Peul, Wilco
Green, Colin
Winterfeldt, Kristi
Taylor, Rod S
author_sort Eldabe, Sam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic radicular pain can be effectively treated with spinal cord stimulation, but this therapy is not always sufficient for chronic back pain. Subcutaneous nerve stimulation (SQS) refers to the placement of percutaneous leads in the subcutaneous tissue within the area of pain. Case series data show that failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) patients experience clinically important levels of pain relief following SQS and may also reduce their levels of analgesic therapy and experience functional well-being. However, to date, there is no randomized controlled trial evidence to support the use of SQS in FBSS. METHODS/DESIGN: The SubQStim study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing SQS plus optimized medical management (‘SQS arm’) versus optimized medical management alone (‘OMM arm’) in patients with predominant back pain due to FBSS. Up to 400 patients will be recruited from approximately 33 centers in Europe and Australia and will be randomized 1:1 to the SQS or OMM arms. After 9 months, patients who fail to reach the primary outcome will be allowed to switch treatments. Patients will be evaluated at baseline (prior to randomization) and at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months after randomization. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients at 9 months with a ≥50% reduction in back pain intensity compared to baseline. The secondary outcomes are: back and leg pain intensity score, functional disability, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, patient global impression of change, healthcare resource utilization/costs, cost-effectiveness analysis and adverse events. Outcomes arms will be compared between SQS and OMM arms at all evaluation points up to and including 9 months. After the 9-month assessment visit, the main analytic focus will be to compare within patient changes in outcomes relative to baseline. DISCUSSION: The SubQStim trial began patient recruitment in November 2012. Recruitment is expected to close in late 2014. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01711619
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3700888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37008882013-07-04 Assessing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of subcutaneous nerve stimulation in patients with predominant back pain due to failed back surgery syndrome (SubQStim study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial Eldabe, Sam Kern, Michael Peul, Wilco Green, Colin Winterfeldt, Kristi Taylor, Rod S Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Chronic radicular pain can be effectively treated with spinal cord stimulation, but this therapy is not always sufficient for chronic back pain. Subcutaneous nerve stimulation (SQS) refers to the placement of percutaneous leads in the subcutaneous tissue within the area of pain. Case series data show that failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) patients experience clinically important levels of pain relief following SQS and may also reduce their levels of analgesic therapy and experience functional well-being. However, to date, there is no randomized controlled trial evidence to support the use of SQS in FBSS. METHODS/DESIGN: The SubQStim study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing SQS plus optimized medical management (‘SQS arm’) versus optimized medical management alone (‘OMM arm’) in patients with predominant back pain due to FBSS. Up to 400 patients will be recruited from approximately 33 centers in Europe and Australia and will be randomized 1:1 to the SQS or OMM arms. After 9 months, patients who fail to reach the primary outcome will be allowed to switch treatments. Patients will be evaluated at baseline (prior to randomization) and at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months after randomization. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients at 9 months with a ≥50% reduction in back pain intensity compared to baseline. The secondary outcomes are: back and leg pain intensity score, functional disability, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, patient global impression of change, healthcare resource utilization/costs, cost-effectiveness analysis and adverse events. Outcomes arms will be compared between SQS and OMM arms at all evaluation points up to and including 9 months. After the 9-month assessment visit, the main analytic focus will be to compare within patient changes in outcomes relative to baseline. DISCUSSION: The SubQStim trial began patient recruitment in November 2012. Recruitment is expected to close in late 2014. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01711619 BioMed Central 2013-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3700888/ /pubmed/23799929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-189 Text en Copyright © 2013 Eldabe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Eldabe, Sam
Kern, Michael
Peul, Wilco
Green, Colin
Winterfeldt, Kristi
Taylor, Rod S
Assessing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of subcutaneous nerve stimulation in patients with predominant back pain due to failed back surgery syndrome (SubQStim study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial
title Assessing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of subcutaneous nerve stimulation in patients with predominant back pain due to failed back surgery syndrome (SubQStim study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_full Assessing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of subcutaneous nerve stimulation in patients with predominant back pain due to failed back surgery syndrome (SubQStim study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Assessing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of subcutaneous nerve stimulation in patients with predominant back pain due to failed back surgery syndrome (SubQStim study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of subcutaneous nerve stimulation in patients with predominant back pain due to failed back surgery syndrome (SubQStim study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_short Assessing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of subcutaneous nerve stimulation in patients with predominant back pain due to failed back surgery syndrome (SubQStim study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_sort assessing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of subcutaneous nerve stimulation in patients with predominant back pain due to failed back surgery syndrome (subqstim study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3700888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23799929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-189
work_keys_str_mv AT eldabesam assessingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofsubcutaneousnervestimulationinpatientswithpredominantbackpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromesubqstimstudystudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kernmichael assessingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofsubcutaneousnervestimulationinpatientswithpredominantbackpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromesubqstimstudystudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT peulwilco assessingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofsubcutaneousnervestimulationinpatientswithpredominantbackpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromesubqstimstudystudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT greencolin assessingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofsubcutaneousnervestimulationinpatientswithpredominantbackpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromesubqstimstudystudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT winterfeldtkristi assessingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofsubcutaneousnervestimulationinpatientswithpredominantbackpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromesubqstimstudystudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT taylorrods assessingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofsubcutaneousnervestimulationinpatientswithpredominantbackpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromesubqstimstudystudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial