Cargando…
Assessing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of subcutaneous nerve stimulation in patients with predominant back pain due to failed back surgery syndrome (SubQStim study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Chronic radicular pain can be effectively treated with spinal cord stimulation, but this therapy is not always sufficient for chronic back pain. Subcutaneous nerve stimulation (SQS) refers to the placement of percutaneous leads in the subcutaneous tissue within the area of pain. Case ser...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3700888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23799929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-189 |
_version_ | 1782275553377648640 |
---|---|
author | Eldabe, Sam Kern, Michael Peul, Wilco Green, Colin Winterfeldt, Kristi Taylor, Rod S |
author_facet | Eldabe, Sam Kern, Michael Peul, Wilco Green, Colin Winterfeldt, Kristi Taylor, Rod S |
author_sort | Eldabe, Sam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chronic radicular pain can be effectively treated with spinal cord stimulation, but this therapy is not always sufficient for chronic back pain. Subcutaneous nerve stimulation (SQS) refers to the placement of percutaneous leads in the subcutaneous tissue within the area of pain. Case series data show that failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) patients experience clinically important levels of pain relief following SQS and may also reduce their levels of analgesic therapy and experience functional well-being. However, to date, there is no randomized controlled trial evidence to support the use of SQS in FBSS. METHODS/DESIGN: The SubQStim study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing SQS plus optimized medical management (‘SQS arm’) versus optimized medical management alone (‘OMM arm’) in patients with predominant back pain due to FBSS. Up to 400 patients will be recruited from approximately 33 centers in Europe and Australia and will be randomized 1:1 to the SQS or OMM arms. After 9 months, patients who fail to reach the primary outcome will be allowed to switch treatments. Patients will be evaluated at baseline (prior to randomization) and at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months after randomization. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients at 9 months with a ≥50% reduction in back pain intensity compared to baseline. The secondary outcomes are: back and leg pain intensity score, functional disability, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, patient global impression of change, healthcare resource utilization/costs, cost-effectiveness analysis and adverse events. Outcomes arms will be compared between SQS and OMM arms at all evaluation points up to and including 9 months. After the 9-month assessment visit, the main analytic focus will be to compare within patient changes in outcomes relative to baseline. DISCUSSION: The SubQStim trial began patient recruitment in November 2012. Recruitment is expected to close in late 2014. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01711619 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3700888 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37008882013-07-04 Assessing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of subcutaneous nerve stimulation in patients with predominant back pain due to failed back surgery syndrome (SubQStim study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial Eldabe, Sam Kern, Michael Peul, Wilco Green, Colin Winterfeldt, Kristi Taylor, Rod S Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Chronic radicular pain can be effectively treated with spinal cord stimulation, but this therapy is not always sufficient for chronic back pain. Subcutaneous nerve stimulation (SQS) refers to the placement of percutaneous leads in the subcutaneous tissue within the area of pain. Case series data show that failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) patients experience clinically important levels of pain relief following SQS and may also reduce their levels of analgesic therapy and experience functional well-being. However, to date, there is no randomized controlled trial evidence to support the use of SQS in FBSS. METHODS/DESIGN: The SubQStim study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing SQS plus optimized medical management (‘SQS arm’) versus optimized medical management alone (‘OMM arm’) in patients with predominant back pain due to FBSS. Up to 400 patients will be recruited from approximately 33 centers in Europe and Australia and will be randomized 1:1 to the SQS or OMM arms. After 9 months, patients who fail to reach the primary outcome will be allowed to switch treatments. Patients will be evaluated at baseline (prior to randomization) and at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months after randomization. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients at 9 months with a ≥50% reduction in back pain intensity compared to baseline. The secondary outcomes are: back and leg pain intensity score, functional disability, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, patient global impression of change, healthcare resource utilization/costs, cost-effectiveness analysis and adverse events. Outcomes arms will be compared between SQS and OMM arms at all evaluation points up to and including 9 months. After the 9-month assessment visit, the main analytic focus will be to compare within patient changes in outcomes relative to baseline. DISCUSSION: The SubQStim trial began patient recruitment in November 2012. Recruitment is expected to close in late 2014. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01711619 BioMed Central 2013-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3700888/ /pubmed/23799929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-189 Text en Copyright © 2013 Eldabe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Eldabe, Sam Kern, Michael Peul, Wilco Green, Colin Winterfeldt, Kristi Taylor, Rod S Assessing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of subcutaneous nerve stimulation in patients with predominant back pain due to failed back surgery syndrome (SubQStim study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial |
title | Assessing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of subcutaneous nerve stimulation in patients with predominant back pain due to failed back surgery syndrome (SubQStim study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Assessing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of subcutaneous nerve stimulation in patients with predominant back pain due to failed back surgery syndrome (SubQStim study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Assessing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of subcutaneous nerve stimulation in patients with predominant back pain due to failed back surgery syndrome (SubQStim study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of subcutaneous nerve stimulation in patients with predominant back pain due to failed back surgery syndrome (SubQStim study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Assessing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of subcutaneous nerve stimulation in patients with predominant back pain due to failed back surgery syndrome (SubQStim study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | assessing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of subcutaneous nerve stimulation in patients with predominant back pain due to failed back surgery syndrome (subqstim study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3700888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23799929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-189 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eldabesam assessingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofsubcutaneousnervestimulationinpatientswithpredominantbackpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromesubqstimstudystudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kernmichael assessingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofsubcutaneousnervestimulationinpatientswithpredominantbackpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromesubqstimstudystudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT peulwilco assessingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofsubcutaneousnervestimulationinpatientswithpredominantbackpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromesubqstimstudystudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT greencolin assessingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofsubcutaneousnervestimulationinpatientswithpredominantbackpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromesubqstimstudystudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT winterfeldtkristi assessingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofsubcutaneousnervestimulationinpatientswithpredominantbackpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromesubqstimstudystudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT taylorrods assessingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofsubcutaneousnervestimulationinpatientswithpredominantbackpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromesubqstimstudystudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial |