Cargando…

Emergency treatment on facial laceration of dog bite wounds with immediate primary closure: a prospective randomized trial study

BACKGROUND: To investigate the emergency treatment on facial laceration of dog bite wounds and identify whether immediate primary closure is feasible. METHODS: Six hundred cases with facial laceration attacked by dog were divided into two groups randomly and evenly. After thorough debridement, the f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rui-feng, Chen, Li-song, Huang, Ji-bo, Zheng, Li-qiu, Wang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3701467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23902527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-13-S1-S2
_version_ 1782275644238856192
author Rui-feng, Chen
Li-song, Huang
Ji-bo, Zheng
Li-qiu, Wang
author_facet Rui-feng, Chen
Li-song, Huang
Ji-bo, Zheng
Li-qiu, Wang
author_sort Rui-feng, Chen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To investigate the emergency treatment on facial laceration of dog bite wounds and identify whether immediate primary closure is feasible. METHODS: Six hundred cases with facial laceration attacked by dog were divided into two groups randomly and evenly. After thorough debridement, the facial lacerations of group A were left open, while the lacerations of group B were undertaken immediate primary closure. Antibiotics use was administrated only after wound infected, not prophylactically given. The infection rate, infection time and healing time were analyzed. RESULTS: The infection rate of group A and B was 8.3% and 6.3% respectively (P>0.05); the infection time was 26.3±11.6h and 24.9±13.8h respectively (P>0.05), the healing time was 9.12±1.30d and 6.57±0.49d respectively (P<0.05) in taintless cases, 14.24±2.63d and 10.65±1.69d respectively (P<0.05) in infected cases. Compared with group A, there was no evident tendency in increasing infection rate (8.3% in group A and 6.3% in group B respectively) and infection period (26.3±11.6h in group A and 24.9±13.8h in group B respectively) in group B. Meanwhile, in group B, the wound healing time was shorter than group A statistically in both taintless cases (9.12±1.30d in group A and 6.57±0.49d in group B respectively) and infected cases (14.24±2.63d in group A and 10.65±1.69d in group B respectively). CONCLUSION: The facial laceration of dog bite wounds should be primary closed immediately after formal and thoroughly debridement. And the primary closure would shorten the healing time of the dog bite wounds without increasing the rate and period of infection. There is no potentiality of increasing infection incidence and infection speed, compared immediate primary closure with the wounds left open. On the contrary, primary closure the wounds can promote its primary healing. Prophylactic antibiotics administration was not recommended. and the important facial organ or tissue injuries should be secondary reconditioned.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3701467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37014672013-07-10 Emergency treatment on facial laceration of dog bite wounds with immediate primary closure: a prospective randomized trial study Rui-feng, Chen Li-song, Huang Ji-bo, Zheng Li-qiu, Wang BMC Emerg Med Proceedings BACKGROUND: To investigate the emergency treatment on facial laceration of dog bite wounds and identify whether immediate primary closure is feasible. METHODS: Six hundred cases with facial laceration attacked by dog were divided into two groups randomly and evenly. After thorough debridement, the facial lacerations of group A were left open, while the lacerations of group B were undertaken immediate primary closure. Antibiotics use was administrated only after wound infected, not prophylactically given. The infection rate, infection time and healing time were analyzed. RESULTS: The infection rate of group A and B was 8.3% and 6.3% respectively (P>0.05); the infection time was 26.3±11.6h and 24.9±13.8h respectively (P>0.05), the healing time was 9.12±1.30d and 6.57±0.49d respectively (P<0.05) in taintless cases, 14.24±2.63d and 10.65±1.69d respectively (P<0.05) in infected cases. Compared with group A, there was no evident tendency in increasing infection rate (8.3% in group A and 6.3% in group B respectively) and infection period (26.3±11.6h in group A and 24.9±13.8h in group B respectively) in group B. Meanwhile, in group B, the wound healing time was shorter than group A statistically in both taintless cases (9.12±1.30d in group A and 6.57±0.49d in group B respectively) and infected cases (14.24±2.63d in group A and 10.65±1.69d in group B respectively). CONCLUSION: The facial laceration of dog bite wounds should be primary closed immediately after formal and thoroughly debridement. And the primary closure would shorten the healing time of the dog bite wounds without increasing the rate and period of infection. There is no potentiality of increasing infection incidence and infection speed, compared immediate primary closure with the wounds left open. On the contrary, primary closure the wounds can promote its primary healing. Prophylactic antibiotics administration was not recommended. and the important facial organ or tissue injuries should be secondary reconditioned. BioMed Central 2013-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3701467/ /pubmed/23902527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-13-S1-S2 Text en Copyright © 2013 licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Proceedings
Rui-feng, Chen
Li-song, Huang
Ji-bo, Zheng
Li-qiu, Wang
Emergency treatment on facial laceration of dog bite wounds with immediate primary closure: a prospective randomized trial study
title Emergency treatment on facial laceration of dog bite wounds with immediate primary closure: a prospective randomized trial study
title_full Emergency treatment on facial laceration of dog bite wounds with immediate primary closure: a prospective randomized trial study
title_fullStr Emergency treatment on facial laceration of dog bite wounds with immediate primary closure: a prospective randomized trial study
title_full_unstemmed Emergency treatment on facial laceration of dog bite wounds with immediate primary closure: a prospective randomized trial study
title_short Emergency treatment on facial laceration of dog bite wounds with immediate primary closure: a prospective randomized trial study
title_sort emergency treatment on facial laceration of dog bite wounds with immediate primary closure: a prospective randomized trial study
topic Proceedings
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3701467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23902527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-13-S1-S2
work_keys_str_mv AT ruifengchen emergencytreatmentonfaciallacerationofdogbitewoundswithimmediateprimaryclosureaprospectiverandomizedtrialstudy
AT lisonghuang emergencytreatmentonfaciallacerationofdogbitewoundswithimmediateprimaryclosureaprospectiverandomizedtrialstudy
AT jibozheng emergencytreatmentonfaciallacerationofdogbitewoundswithimmediateprimaryclosureaprospectiverandomizedtrialstudy
AT liqiuwang emergencytreatmentonfaciallacerationofdogbitewoundswithimmediateprimaryclosureaprospectiverandomizedtrialstudy