Cargando…

Pharmacological interventions in acute respiratory distress syndrome

Pharmacological interventions are commonly considered in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) and neuromuscular blockers (NMBs) are used in patients with severe hypoxemia. No outcome benefit has been observed with the systematic use of iNO. However, a somet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roch, Antoine, Hraiech, Sami, Dizier, Stéphanie, Papazian, Laurent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3701581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23822630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-3-20
_version_ 1782275670067380224
author Roch, Antoine
Hraiech, Sami
Dizier, Stéphanie
Papazian, Laurent
author_facet Roch, Antoine
Hraiech, Sami
Dizier, Stéphanie
Papazian, Laurent
author_sort Roch, Antoine
collection PubMed
description Pharmacological interventions are commonly considered in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) and neuromuscular blockers (NMBs) are used in patients with severe hypoxemia. No outcome benefit has been observed with the systematic use of iNO. However, a sometimes important improvement in oxygenation can occur shortly after starting administration. Therefore, its ease of use and its good tolerance justify iNO optionally combined with almitirne as a rescue therapy on a trial basis. Recent data from the literature support the use of a 48-h infusion of NMBs in patients with a PaO(2) to FiO(2) ratio <120 mmHg. No strong evidence exists on the increase of ICU-acquired paresis after a short course of NMBs. Fluid management with the goal to obtain zero fluid balance in ARDS patients without shock or renal failure significantly increases the number of days without mechanical ventilation. On the other hand, patients with hemodynamic failure must receive early and adapted fluid resuscitation. Liberal and conservative fluid strategies therefore are complementary and should ideally follow each other in time in the same patient whose hemodynamic state progressively stabilizes. At present, albumin treatment does not appear to be justified for limitation of pulmonary edema and respiratory morbidity. Aerosolized β2-agonists do not improve outcome in patients with ARDS and one study strongly suggests that intravenous salbutamol may worsen outcome in those patients. The early use of high doses of corticosteroids for the prevention of ARDS in septic shock patients or in patients with confirmed ARDS significantly reduced the duration of mechanical ventilation but had no effect or even increased mortality. In patients with persistent ARDS after 7 to 28 days, a randomized trial showed no reduction in mortality with moderate doses of corticosteroids but an increased PaO(2) to FiO(2) ratio and thoracopulmonary compliance were found, as well as shorter durations of mechanical ventilation and of ICU stay. Conflicting data exist on the interest of low doses of corticosteroids (200 mg/day of hydrocortisone) in ARDS patients. In the context of a persistent ARDS with histological proof of fibroproliferation, a corticosteroid treatment with a progressive decrease of doses can be proposed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3701581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37015812013-07-08 Pharmacological interventions in acute respiratory distress syndrome Roch, Antoine Hraiech, Sami Dizier, Stéphanie Papazian, Laurent Ann Intensive Care Review Pharmacological interventions are commonly considered in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) and neuromuscular blockers (NMBs) are used in patients with severe hypoxemia. No outcome benefit has been observed with the systematic use of iNO. However, a sometimes important improvement in oxygenation can occur shortly after starting administration. Therefore, its ease of use and its good tolerance justify iNO optionally combined with almitirne as a rescue therapy on a trial basis. Recent data from the literature support the use of a 48-h infusion of NMBs in patients with a PaO(2) to FiO(2) ratio <120 mmHg. No strong evidence exists on the increase of ICU-acquired paresis after a short course of NMBs. Fluid management with the goal to obtain zero fluid balance in ARDS patients without shock or renal failure significantly increases the number of days without mechanical ventilation. On the other hand, patients with hemodynamic failure must receive early and adapted fluid resuscitation. Liberal and conservative fluid strategies therefore are complementary and should ideally follow each other in time in the same patient whose hemodynamic state progressively stabilizes. At present, albumin treatment does not appear to be justified for limitation of pulmonary edema and respiratory morbidity. Aerosolized β2-agonists do not improve outcome in patients with ARDS and one study strongly suggests that intravenous salbutamol may worsen outcome in those patients. The early use of high doses of corticosteroids for the prevention of ARDS in septic shock patients or in patients with confirmed ARDS significantly reduced the duration of mechanical ventilation but had no effect or even increased mortality. In patients with persistent ARDS after 7 to 28 days, a randomized trial showed no reduction in mortality with moderate doses of corticosteroids but an increased PaO(2) to FiO(2) ratio and thoracopulmonary compliance were found, as well as shorter durations of mechanical ventilation and of ICU stay. Conflicting data exist on the interest of low doses of corticosteroids (200 mg/day of hydrocortisone) in ARDS patients. In the context of a persistent ARDS with histological proof of fibroproliferation, a corticosteroid treatment with a progressive decrease of doses can be proposed. Springer 2013-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3701581/ /pubmed/23822630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-3-20 Text en Copyright ©2013 Roch et al.; licensee Springer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Roch, Antoine
Hraiech, Sami
Dizier, Stéphanie
Papazian, Laurent
Pharmacological interventions in acute respiratory distress syndrome
title Pharmacological interventions in acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_full Pharmacological interventions in acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_fullStr Pharmacological interventions in acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacological interventions in acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_short Pharmacological interventions in acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_sort pharmacological interventions in acute respiratory distress syndrome
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3701581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23822630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-3-20
work_keys_str_mv AT rochantoine pharmacologicalinterventionsinacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT hraiechsami pharmacologicalinterventionsinacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT dizierstephanie pharmacologicalinterventionsinacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT papazianlaurent pharmacologicalinterventionsinacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome