Cargando…

Patient preference for involvement, experienced involvement, decisional conflict, and satisfaction with physician: a structural equation model test

BACKGROUND: A comprehensive model of the relationships among different shared decision-making related constructs and their effects on patient-relevant outcomes is largely missing. Objective of our study was the development of a model linking decision-making in medical encounters to an intermediate a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hölzel, Lars P, Kriston, Levente, Härter, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3701592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23800366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-231
_version_ 1782275671658070016
author Hölzel, Lars P
Kriston, Levente
Härter, Martin
author_facet Hölzel, Lars P
Kriston, Levente
Härter, Martin
author_sort Hölzel, Lars P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A comprehensive model of the relationships among different shared decision-making related constructs and their effects on patient-relevant outcomes is largely missing. Objective of our study was the development of a model linking decision-making in medical encounters to an intermediate and a long-term endpoint. The following hypotheses were tested: physicians are more likely to involve patients who have a preference for participation and are willing to take responsibility in the medical decision-making process, increased patient involvement decreases decisional conflict, and lower decisional conflict favourably influences patient satisfaction with the physician. METHODS: This model was tested in a German primary care sample (N = 1,913). Psychometrically tested instruments were administered to assess the following: patients’ preference for being involved in medical decision-making, patients’ experienced involvement in medical decision-making, decisional conflict, and satisfaction with the primary care provider. Structural equation modelling was used to explore multiple associations. The model was tested and adjusted in a development sub-sample and cross-validated in a confirmatory sample. Demographic and clinical characteristics were accounted for as possible confounders. RESULTS: Local and global indexes suggested an acceptable fit between the theoretical model and the data. Increased patient involvement was strongly associated with decreased decisional conflict (standardised regression coefficient Β = −.73). Both high experienced involvement (Β = .34) and low decisional conflict (B = -.28) predicted higher satisfaction with the physician. Patients’ preference for involvement was negatively associated with the experienced involvement (B = −.24). CONCLUSION: Altogether, our model could be largely corroborated by the collected empirical data except the unexpected negative association between preference for involvement and experienced involvement. Future research on the associations among different SDM-related constructs should incorporate longitudinal studies in order to strengthen the hypothesis of causal associations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3701592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37015922013-07-05 Patient preference for involvement, experienced involvement, decisional conflict, and satisfaction with physician: a structural equation model test Hölzel, Lars P Kriston, Levente Härter, Martin BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: A comprehensive model of the relationships among different shared decision-making related constructs and their effects on patient-relevant outcomes is largely missing. Objective of our study was the development of a model linking decision-making in medical encounters to an intermediate and a long-term endpoint. The following hypotheses were tested: physicians are more likely to involve patients who have a preference for participation and are willing to take responsibility in the medical decision-making process, increased patient involvement decreases decisional conflict, and lower decisional conflict favourably influences patient satisfaction with the physician. METHODS: This model was tested in a German primary care sample (N = 1,913). Psychometrically tested instruments were administered to assess the following: patients’ preference for being involved in medical decision-making, patients’ experienced involvement in medical decision-making, decisional conflict, and satisfaction with the primary care provider. Structural equation modelling was used to explore multiple associations. The model was tested and adjusted in a development sub-sample and cross-validated in a confirmatory sample. Demographic and clinical characteristics were accounted for as possible confounders. RESULTS: Local and global indexes suggested an acceptable fit between the theoretical model and the data. Increased patient involvement was strongly associated with decreased decisional conflict (standardised regression coefficient Β = −.73). Both high experienced involvement (Β = .34) and low decisional conflict (B = -.28) predicted higher satisfaction with the physician. Patients’ preference for involvement was negatively associated with the experienced involvement (B = −.24). CONCLUSION: Altogether, our model could be largely corroborated by the collected empirical data except the unexpected negative association between preference for involvement and experienced involvement. Future research on the associations among different SDM-related constructs should incorporate longitudinal studies in order to strengthen the hypothesis of causal associations. BioMed Central 2013-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3701592/ /pubmed/23800366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-231 Text en Copyright © 2013 Hölzel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hölzel, Lars P
Kriston, Levente
Härter, Martin
Patient preference for involvement, experienced involvement, decisional conflict, and satisfaction with physician: a structural equation model test
title Patient preference for involvement, experienced involvement, decisional conflict, and satisfaction with physician: a structural equation model test
title_full Patient preference for involvement, experienced involvement, decisional conflict, and satisfaction with physician: a structural equation model test
title_fullStr Patient preference for involvement, experienced involvement, decisional conflict, and satisfaction with physician: a structural equation model test
title_full_unstemmed Patient preference for involvement, experienced involvement, decisional conflict, and satisfaction with physician: a structural equation model test
title_short Patient preference for involvement, experienced involvement, decisional conflict, and satisfaction with physician: a structural equation model test
title_sort patient preference for involvement, experienced involvement, decisional conflict, and satisfaction with physician: a structural equation model test
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3701592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23800366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-231
work_keys_str_mv AT holzellarsp patientpreferenceforinvolvementexperiencedinvolvementdecisionalconflictandsatisfactionwithphysicianastructuralequationmodeltest
AT kristonlevente patientpreferenceforinvolvementexperiencedinvolvementdecisionalconflictandsatisfactionwithphysicianastructuralequationmodeltest
AT hartermartin patientpreferenceforinvolvementexperiencedinvolvementdecisionalconflictandsatisfactionwithphysicianastructuralequationmodeltest