Cargando…

Assessment of adhesion formation after laparoscopic intraperitoneal implantation of Dynamesh IPOM mesh

INTRODUCTION: Formation of adhesions after laparoscopic hernia repair using the intra-peritoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) procedure can lead to intestinal obstruction or mesh erosion into intestinal lumen. The aims of this study included: measurement of adhesion formation with Dynamesh IPOM after laparosco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jamry, Andrzej, Jałyński, Marek, Piskorz, Łukasz, Brocki, Marian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3701981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23847671
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2013.35345
_version_ 1782275737397493760
author Jamry, Andrzej
Jałyński, Marek
Piskorz, Łukasz
Brocki, Marian
author_facet Jamry, Andrzej
Jałyński, Marek
Piskorz, Łukasz
Brocki, Marian
author_sort Jamry, Andrzej
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Formation of adhesions after laparoscopic hernia repair using the intra-peritoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) procedure can lead to intestinal obstruction or mesh erosion into intestinal lumen. The aims of this study included: measurement of adhesion formation with Dynamesh IPOM after laparoscopic intraperitoneal implantation, and assessment of the occurrence of isolated adhesions at the fastening sites of slowly absorbable sutures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve healthy pigs underwent laparoscopic implantation of 2 Dynamesh IPOM mesh fragments each, one was fastened with PDSII, and the other with Maxon sutures. An assessment of adhesion formation was carried out after 6 weeks and included an evaluation of surface area, hardness according to the Zhulke scale, and index values. The occurrence of isolated adhesions at slowly absorbable suture fixation points was also analyzed. RESULTS: Adhesions were noted in 83.3% of Dynamesh IPOM meshes. Adhesions covered on average 37.7% of the mesh surface with mean hardness 1.46 and index value 78.8. In groups fixed with PDS in comparison to Maxon sutures adhesions covered mean 31.6% vs. 42.5% (p = 0.62) of the mesh surface, mean hardness was 1.67 vs.1.25 (p = 0.34) and index 85.42 vs. 72.02 (p = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: The Dynamesh IPOM mesh, in spite of its anti-adhesive layer of PVDF, does not prevent the formation of adhesions. Adhesion hardness, surface area, and index values of the Dynamesh IPOM mesh are close to the mean values of these parameters for other commercially available 2-layer meshes. Slowly absorbable sutures used for fastening did not increase the risk of adhesion formation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3701981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37019812013-07-11 Assessment of adhesion formation after laparoscopic intraperitoneal implantation of Dynamesh IPOM mesh Jamry, Andrzej Jałyński, Marek Piskorz, Łukasz Brocki, Marian Arch Med Sci Clinical Research INTRODUCTION: Formation of adhesions after laparoscopic hernia repair using the intra-peritoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) procedure can lead to intestinal obstruction or mesh erosion into intestinal lumen. The aims of this study included: measurement of adhesion formation with Dynamesh IPOM after laparoscopic intraperitoneal implantation, and assessment of the occurrence of isolated adhesions at the fastening sites of slowly absorbable sutures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve healthy pigs underwent laparoscopic implantation of 2 Dynamesh IPOM mesh fragments each, one was fastened with PDSII, and the other with Maxon sutures. An assessment of adhesion formation was carried out after 6 weeks and included an evaluation of surface area, hardness according to the Zhulke scale, and index values. The occurrence of isolated adhesions at slowly absorbable suture fixation points was also analyzed. RESULTS: Adhesions were noted in 83.3% of Dynamesh IPOM meshes. Adhesions covered on average 37.7% of the mesh surface with mean hardness 1.46 and index value 78.8. In groups fixed with PDS in comparison to Maxon sutures adhesions covered mean 31.6% vs. 42.5% (p = 0.62) of the mesh surface, mean hardness was 1.67 vs.1.25 (p = 0.34) and index 85.42 vs. 72.02 (p = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: The Dynamesh IPOM mesh, in spite of its anti-adhesive layer of PVDF, does not prevent the formation of adhesions. Adhesion hardness, surface area, and index values of the Dynamesh IPOM mesh are close to the mean values of these parameters for other commercially available 2-layer meshes. Slowly absorbable sutures used for fastening did not increase the risk of adhesion formation. Termedia Publishing House 2013-05-27 2013-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3701981/ /pubmed/23847671 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2013.35345 Text en Copyright © 2013 Termedia & Banach http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Jamry, Andrzej
Jałyński, Marek
Piskorz, Łukasz
Brocki, Marian
Assessment of adhesion formation after laparoscopic intraperitoneal implantation of Dynamesh IPOM mesh
title Assessment of adhesion formation after laparoscopic intraperitoneal implantation of Dynamesh IPOM mesh
title_full Assessment of adhesion formation after laparoscopic intraperitoneal implantation of Dynamesh IPOM mesh
title_fullStr Assessment of adhesion formation after laparoscopic intraperitoneal implantation of Dynamesh IPOM mesh
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of adhesion formation after laparoscopic intraperitoneal implantation of Dynamesh IPOM mesh
title_short Assessment of adhesion formation after laparoscopic intraperitoneal implantation of Dynamesh IPOM mesh
title_sort assessment of adhesion formation after laparoscopic intraperitoneal implantation of dynamesh ipom mesh
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3701981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23847671
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2013.35345
work_keys_str_mv AT jamryandrzej assessmentofadhesionformationafterlaparoscopicintraperitonealimplantationofdynameshipommesh
AT jałynskimarek assessmentofadhesionformationafterlaparoscopicintraperitonealimplantationofdynameshipommesh
AT piskorzłukasz assessmentofadhesionformationafterlaparoscopicintraperitonealimplantationofdynameshipommesh
AT brockimarian assessmentofadhesionformationafterlaparoscopicintraperitonealimplantationofdynameshipommesh