Cargando…

Are women satisfied when using levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding?

AIM: To determine the efficacy of levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG IUS) in treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) in women over 35 years and to determine satisfaction of users of LNG IUS in case of AUB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicentric, retrospective, and observational stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mansukhani, Nina, Unni, Jyothi, Dua, Meenakshi, Darbari, Reeta, Malik, Sonia, Verma, Sohani, Bathla, Sonal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3702062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23833531
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-7800.109633
_version_ 1782275747301294080
author Mansukhani, Nina
Unni, Jyothi
Dua, Meenakshi
Darbari, Reeta
Malik, Sonia
Verma, Sohani
Bathla, Sonal
author_facet Mansukhani, Nina
Unni, Jyothi
Dua, Meenakshi
Darbari, Reeta
Malik, Sonia
Verma, Sohani
Bathla, Sonal
author_sort Mansukhani, Nina
collection PubMed
description AIM: To determine the efficacy of levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG IUS) in treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) in women over 35 years and to determine satisfaction of users of LNG IUS in case of AUB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicentric, retrospective, and observational study. Case records of patients with AUB from the hospitals in Pune, Delhi, and Gurgaon for the last 6 years were examined. Records of 80 women who had an LNG IUS inserted were included. The chief complaints and their duration were recorded. Investigation results, histopathology reports, and date of LNG IUS insertion were noted. The incidence of spotting, heavy menstrual bleeding, pain, expulsion, and amenorrhea were recorded at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months following treatment. Following this a telephonic interview was conducted to determine the efficacy of LNG IUS in treating the symptoms. Patients’ satisfaction in percentage was also noted and they were asked if they would recommend the LNG IUS to other women. RESULTS: The mean age of women was 42.3 years. 77.5% of the women had menorrhagia as the chief complaint, and the mean duration was 12 months. Fibroids and adenomyosis were the most common pathology, present in 21.3% and 20% of the patients respectively. At 3 months, spotting seemed to be the predominant symptom (59.4%) and only 15% women had heavy bleeding. 49.3% of women were asymptomatic at 6 months. 27.5% had amenorrhea by the end of 18 months. 14 women in whom the device was expelled or removed due to persistent symptoms, underwent hysterectomy at various stages during the study period. Overall patient satisfaction was high at about 80%. Furthermore, 73.8% patients agreed to recommend it to other women. CONCLUSION: LNG IUS seems to be a viable and effective treatment option for AUB in women after 35 years. There is a high rate of patient satisfaction in appropriately selected patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3702062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37020622013-07-05 Are women satisfied when using levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding? Mansukhani, Nina Unni, Jyothi Dua, Meenakshi Darbari, Reeta Malik, Sonia Verma, Sohani Bathla, Sonal J Midlife Health Original Article AIM: To determine the efficacy of levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG IUS) in treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) in women over 35 years and to determine satisfaction of users of LNG IUS in case of AUB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicentric, retrospective, and observational study. Case records of patients with AUB from the hospitals in Pune, Delhi, and Gurgaon for the last 6 years were examined. Records of 80 women who had an LNG IUS inserted were included. The chief complaints and their duration were recorded. Investigation results, histopathology reports, and date of LNG IUS insertion were noted. The incidence of spotting, heavy menstrual bleeding, pain, expulsion, and amenorrhea were recorded at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months following treatment. Following this a telephonic interview was conducted to determine the efficacy of LNG IUS in treating the symptoms. Patients’ satisfaction in percentage was also noted and they were asked if they would recommend the LNG IUS to other women. RESULTS: The mean age of women was 42.3 years. 77.5% of the women had menorrhagia as the chief complaint, and the mean duration was 12 months. Fibroids and adenomyosis were the most common pathology, present in 21.3% and 20% of the patients respectively. At 3 months, spotting seemed to be the predominant symptom (59.4%) and only 15% women had heavy bleeding. 49.3% of women were asymptomatic at 6 months. 27.5% had amenorrhea by the end of 18 months. 14 women in whom the device was expelled or removed due to persistent symptoms, underwent hysterectomy at various stages during the study period. Overall patient satisfaction was high at about 80%. Furthermore, 73.8% patients agreed to recommend it to other women. CONCLUSION: LNG IUS seems to be a viable and effective treatment option for AUB in women after 35 years. There is a high rate of patient satisfaction in appropriately selected patients. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3702062/ /pubmed/23833531 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-7800.109633 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Mid-life Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mansukhani, Nina
Unni, Jyothi
Dua, Meenakshi
Darbari, Reeta
Malik, Sonia
Verma, Sohani
Bathla, Sonal
Are women satisfied when using levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding?
title Are women satisfied when using levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding?
title_full Are women satisfied when using levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding?
title_fullStr Are women satisfied when using levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding?
title_full_unstemmed Are women satisfied when using levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding?
title_short Are women satisfied when using levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding?
title_sort are women satisfied when using levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3702062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23833531
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-7800.109633
work_keys_str_mv AT mansukhaninina arewomensatisfiedwhenusinglevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemfortreatmentofabnormaluterinebleeding
AT unnijyothi arewomensatisfiedwhenusinglevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemfortreatmentofabnormaluterinebleeding
AT duameenakshi arewomensatisfiedwhenusinglevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemfortreatmentofabnormaluterinebleeding
AT darbarireeta arewomensatisfiedwhenusinglevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemfortreatmentofabnormaluterinebleeding
AT maliksonia arewomensatisfiedwhenusinglevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemfortreatmentofabnormaluterinebleeding
AT vermasohani arewomensatisfiedwhenusinglevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemfortreatmentofabnormaluterinebleeding
AT bathlasonal arewomensatisfiedwhenusinglevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemfortreatmentofabnormaluterinebleeding