Cargando…

Mifepristone versus placebo to treat uterine myoma: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and quality of life of 5 mg mifepristone per day compared with a placebo in treating uterine fibroids. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind clinical study. LOCATION: Eusebio Hernández Gynecology and Obstetrics Teaching Hospital, Havana, Cuba. SUBJECTS: One hu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Esteve, Josep Lluis Carbonell, Acosta, Rita, Pérez, Yasmirian, Rodriguez, Barbara, Seigler, Isabel, Sanchez, Carlos, Tomasi, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3702243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23843709
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S42770
_version_ 1782275774750916608
author Esteve, Josep Lluis Carbonell
Acosta, Rita
Pérez, Yasmirian
Rodriguez, Barbara
Seigler, Isabel
Sanchez, Carlos
Tomasi, Giuseppe
author_facet Esteve, Josep Lluis Carbonell
Acosta, Rita
Pérez, Yasmirian
Rodriguez, Barbara
Seigler, Isabel
Sanchez, Carlos
Tomasi, Giuseppe
author_sort Esteve, Josep Lluis Carbonell
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and quality of life of 5 mg mifepristone per day compared with a placebo in treating uterine fibroids. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind clinical study. LOCATION: Eusebio Hernández Gynecology and Obstetrics Teaching Hospital, Havana, Cuba. SUBJECTS: One hundred twenty-four subjects with symptomatic uterine fibroids. TREATMENT: One daily capsule of 5 mg mifepristone or a mifepristone placebo over 3 months. VARIABLES IN EVALUATING SAFETY: Changes in fibroid and uterine volumes, changes in symptom prevalence and intensity, and changes in quality of life. RESULTS: Three months into treatment, fibroid volume was reduced by 28.5% in the mifepristone group with an increase of 1.8% in the placebo group (P = 0.031). There were significant differences between the groups with respect to pelvic pain prevalence (P = 0.006), pelvic pressure (P = 0.027), rectal pain (P = 0.013), hypermenorrhea (P < 0.001), and metrorrhagia (P = 0.002) at the end of treatment. Amenorrhea was 93.1% and 4.3% in the mifepristone and placebo groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Treatment side effects were significantly greater in the mifepristone group. Estradiol levels did not differ significantly between the placebo and mifepristone groups at the end of treatment. Improvement in quality of life was significantly greater in the categories of “symptoms” (P = 0.004) and “activity” (P = 0.045) in the mifepristone group. CONCLUSION: The 5 mg dosage of mifepristone presented significantly superior efficacy compared to the placebo.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3702243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37022432013-07-10 Mifepristone versus placebo to treat uterine myoma: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial Esteve, Josep Lluis Carbonell Acosta, Rita Pérez, Yasmirian Rodriguez, Barbara Seigler, Isabel Sanchez, Carlos Tomasi, Giuseppe Int J Womens Health Original Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and quality of life of 5 mg mifepristone per day compared with a placebo in treating uterine fibroids. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind clinical study. LOCATION: Eusebio Hernández Gynecology and Obstetrics Teaching Hospital, Havana, Cuba. SUBJECTS: One hundred twenty-four subjects with symptomatic uterine fibroids. TREATMENT: One daily capsule of 5 mg mifepristone or a mifepristone placebo over 3 months. VARIABLES IN EVALUATING SAFETY: Changes in fibroid and uterine volumes, changes in symptom prevalence and intensity, and changes in quality of life. RESULTS: Three months into treatment, fibroid volume was reduced by 28.5% in the mifepristone group with an increase of 1.8% in the placebo group (P = 0.031). There were significant differences between the groups with respect to pelvic pain prevalence (P = 0.006), pelvic pressure (P = 0.027), rectal pain (P = 0.013), hypermenorrhea (P < 0.001), and metrorrhagia (P = 0.002) at the end of treatment. Amenorrhea was 93.1% and 4.3% in the mifepristone and placebo groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Treatment side effects were significantly greater in the mifepristone group. Estradiol levels did not differ significantly between the placebo and mifepristone groups at the end of treatment. Improvement in quality of life was significantly greater in the categories of “symptoms” (P = 0.004) and “activity” (P = 0.045) in the mifepristone group. CONCLUSION: The 5 mg dosage of mifepristone presented significantly superior efficacy compared to the placebo. Dove Medical Press 2013-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3702243/ /pubmed/23843709 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S42770 Text en © 2013 Carbonell Esteve et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Esteve, Josep Lluis Carbonell
Acosta, Rita
Pérez, Yasmirian
Rodriguez, Barbara
Seigler, Isabel
Sanchez, Carlos
Tomasi, Giuseppe
Mifepristone versus placebo to treat uterine myoma: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial
title Mifepristone versus placebo to treat uterine myoma: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial
title_full Mifepristone versus placebo to treat uterine myoma: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Mifepristone versus placebo to treat uterine myoma: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Mifepristone versus placebo to treat uterine myoma: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial
title_short Mifepristone versus placebo to treat uterine myoma: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial
title_sort mifepristone versus placebo to treat uterine myoma: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3702243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23843709
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S42770
work_keys_str_mv AT estevejoseplluiscarbonell mifepristoneversusplacebototreatuterinemyomaadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT acostarita mifepristoneversusplacebototreatuterinemyomaadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT perezyasmirian mifepristoneversusplacebototreatuterinemyomaadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT rodriguezbarbara mifepristoneversusplacebototreatuterinemyomaadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT seiglerisabel mifepristoneversusplacebototreatuterinemyomaadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT sanchezcarlos mifepristoneversusplacebototreatuterinemyomaadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT tomasigiuseppe mifepristoneversusplacebototreatuterinemyomaadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial