Cargando…
Mifepristone versus placebo to treat uterine myoma: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and quality of life of 5 mg mifepristone per day compared with a placebo in treating uterine fibroids. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind clinical study. LOCATION: Eusebio Hernández Gynecology and Obstetrics Teaching Hospital, Havana, Cuba. SUBJECTS: One hu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3702243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23843709 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S42770 |
_version_ | 1782275774750916608 |
---|---|
author | Esteve, Josep Lluis Carbonell Acosta, Rita Pérez, Yasmirian Rodriguez, Barbara Seigler, Isabel Sanchez, Carlos Tomasi, Giuseppe |
author_facet | Esteve, Josep Lluis Carbonell Acosta, Rita Pérez, Yasmirian Rodriguez, Barbara Seigler, Isabel Sanchez, Carlos Tomasi, Giuseppe |
author_sort | Esteve, Josep Lluis Carbonell |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and quality of life of 5 mg mifepristone per day compared with a placebo in treating uterine fibroids. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind clinical study. LOCATION: Eusebio Hernández Gynecology and Obstetrics Teaching Hospital, Havana, Cuba. SUBJECTS: One hundred twenty-four subjects with symptomatic uterine fibroids. TREATMENT: One daily capsule of 5 mg mifepristone or a mifepristone placebo over 3 months. VARIABLES IN EVALUATING SAFETY: Changes in fibroid and uterine volumes, changes in symptom prevalence and intensity, and changes in quality of life. RESULTS: Three months into treatment, fibroid volume was reduced by 28.5% in the mifepristone group with an increase of 1.8% in the placebo group (P = 0.031). There were significant differences between the groups with respect to pelvic pain prevalence (P = 0.006), pelvic pressure (P = 0.027), rectal pain (P = 0.013), hypermenorrhea (P < 0.001), and metrorrhagia (P = 0.002) at the end of treatment. Amenorrhea was 93.1% and 4.3% in the mifepristone and placebo groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Treatment side effects were significantly greater in the mifepristone group. Estradiol levels did not differ significantly between the placebo and mifepristone groups at the end of treatment. Improvement in quality of life was significantly greater in the categories of “symptoms” (P = 0.004) and “activity” (P = 0.045) in the mifepristone group. CONCLUSION: The 5 mg dosage of mifepristone presented significantly superior efficacy compared to the placebo. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3702243 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37022432013-07-10 Mifepristone versus placebo to treat uterine myoma: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial Esteve, Josep Lluis Carbonell Acosta, Rita Pérez, Yasmirian Rodriguez, Barbara Seigler, Isabel Sanchez, Carlos Tomasi, Giuseppe Int J Womens Health Original Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and quality of life of 5 mg mifepristone per day compared with a placebo in treating uterine fibroids. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind clinical study. LOCATION: Eusebio Hernández Gynecology and Obstetrics Teaching Hospital, Havana, Cuba. SUBJECTS: One hundred twenty-four subjects with symptomatic uterine fibroids. TREATMENT: One daily capsule of 5 mg mifepristone or a mifepristone placebo over 3 months. VARIABLES IN EVALUATING SAFETY: Changes in fibroid and uterine volumes, changes in symptom prevalence and intensity, and changes in quality of life. RESULTS: Three months into treatment, fibroid volume was reduced by 28.5% in the mifepristone group with an increase of 1.8% in the placebo group (P = 0.031). There were significant differences between the groups with respect to pelvic pain prevalence (P = 0.006), pelvic pressure (P = 0.027), rectal pain (P = 0.013), hypermenorrhea (P < 0.001), and metrorrhagia (P = 0.002) at the end of treatment. Amenorrhea was 93.1% and 4.3% in the mifepristone and placebo groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Treatment side effects were significantly greater in the mifepristone group. Estradiol levels did not differ significantly between the placebo and mifepristone groups at the end of treatment. Improvement in quality of life was significantly greater in the categories of “symptoms” (P = 0.004) and “activity” (P = 0.045) in the mifepristone group. CONCLUSION: The 5 mg dosage of mifepristone presented significantly superior efficacy compared to the placebo. Dove Medical Press 2013-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3702243/ /pubmed/23843709 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S42770 Text en © 2013 Carbonell Esteve et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Esteve, Josep Lluis Carbonell Acosta, Rita Pérez, Yasmirian Rodriguez, Barbara Seigler, Isabel Sanchez, Carlos Tomasi, Giuseppe Mifepristone versus placebo to treat uterine myoma: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial |
title | Mifepristone versus placebo to treat uterine myoma: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial |
title_full | Mifepristone versus placebo to treat uterine myoma: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Mifepristone versus placebo to treat uterine myoma: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Mifepristone versus placebo to treat uterine myoma: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial |
title_short | Mifepristone versus placebo to treat uterine myoma: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial |
title_sort | mifepristone versus placebo to treat uterine myoma: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3702243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23843709 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S42770 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT estevejoseplluiscarbonell mifepristoneversusplacebototreatuterinemyomaadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT acostarita mifepristoneversusplacebototreatuterinemyomaadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT perezyasmirian mifepristoneversusplacebototreatuterinemyomaadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT rodriguezbarbara mifepristoneversusplacebototreatuterinemyomaadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT seiglerisabel mifepristoneversusplacebototreatuterinemyomaadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT sanchezcarlos mifepristoneversusplacebototreatuterinemyomaadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT tomasigiuseppe mifepristoneversusplacebototreatuterinemyomaadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial |