Cargando…
Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 4: Inconsistency in Networks of Evidence Based on Randomized Controlled Trials
Inconsistency can be thought of as a conflict between “direct” evidence on a comparison between treatments B and C and “indirect” evidence gained from AC and AB trials. Like heterogeneity, inconsistency is caused by effect modifiers and specifically by an imbalance in the distribution of effect modi...
Autores principales: | Dias, Sofia, Welton, Nicky J., Sutton, Alex J., Caldwell, Deborah M., Lu, Guobing, Ades, A. E. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3704208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23804508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X12455847 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 7: A Reviewer’s Checklist
por: Ades, A. E., et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 1: Introduction
por: Dias, Sofia, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 6: Embedding Evidence Synthesis in Probabilistic Cost-effectiveness Analysis
por: Dias, Sofia, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 5: The Baseline Natural History Model
por: Dias, Sofia, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2: A Generalized Linear Modeling Framework for Pairwise and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
por: Dias, Sofia, et al.
Publicado: (2013)