Cargando…

Developing a tool to measure satisfaction among health professionals in sub-Saharan Africa

BACKGROUND: In sub-Saharan Africa, lack of motivation and job dissatisfaction have been cited as causes of poor healthcare quality and outcomes. Measurement of health workers’ satisfaction adapted to sub-Saharan African working conditions and cultures is a challenge. The objective of this study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faye, Adama, Fournier, Pierre, Diop, Idrissa, Philibert, Aline, Morestin, Florence, Dumont, Alexandre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3704923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23826720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-11-30
_version_ 1782476367693086720
author Faye, Adama
Fournier, Pierre
Diop, Idrissa
Philibert, Aline
Morestin, Florence
Dumont, Alexandre
author_facet Faye, Adama
Fournier, Pierre
Diop, Idrissa
Philibert, Aline
Morestin, Florence
Dumont, Alexandre
author_sort Faye, Adama
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In sub-Saharan Africa, lack of motivation and job dissatisfaction have been cited as causes of poor healthcare quality and outcomes. Measurement of health workers’ satisfaction adapted to sub-Saharan African working conditions and cultures is a challenge. The objective of this study was to develop a valid and reliable instrument to measure satisfaction among health professionals in the sub-Saharan African context. METHODS: A survey was conducted in Senegal and Mali in 2011 among 962 care providers (doctors, midwives, nurses and technicians) practicing in 46 hospitals (capital, regional and district). The participation rate was very high: 97% (937/962). After exploratory factor analysis (EFA), construct validity was assessed through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The discriminant validity of our subscales was evaluated by comparing the average variance extracted (AVE) for each of the constructs with the squared interconstruct correlation (SIC), and finally for criterion validity, each subscale was tested with two hypotheses. Two dimensions of reliability were assessed: internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha subscales and stability over time using a test-retest process. RESULTS: Eight dimensions of satisfaction encompassing 24 items were identified and validated using a process that combined psychometric analyses and expert opinions: continuing education, salary and benefits, management style, tasks, work environment, workload, moral satisfaction and job stability. All eight dimensions demonstrated significant discriminant validity. The final model showed good performance, with a root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) of 0.0508 (90% CI: 0.0448 to 0.0569) and a comparative fit index (CFI) of 0.9415. The concurrent criterion validity of the eight dimensions was good. Reliability was assessed based on internal consistency, which was good for all dimensions but one (moral satisfaction < 0.70). Test-retest showed satisfactory temporal stability (intra class coefficient range: 0.60 to 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Job satisfaction is a complex construct; this study provides a multidimensional instrument whose content, construct and criterion validities were verified to ensure its suitability for the sub-Saharan African context. When using these subscales in further studies, the variability of the reliability of the subscales should be taken in to account for calculating the sample sizes. The instrument will be useful in evaluative studies which will help guide interventions aimed at improving both the quality of care and its effectiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3704923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37049232013-07-10 Developing a tool to measure satisfaction among health professionals in sub-Saharan Africa Faye, Adama Fournier, Pierre Diop, Idrissa Philibert, Aline Morestin, Florence Dumont, Alexandre Hum Resour Health Research BACKGROUND: In sub-Saharan Africa, lack of motivation and job dissatisfaction have been cited as causes of poor healthcare quality and outcomes. Measurement of health workers’ satisfaction adapted to sub-Saharan African working conditions and cultures is a challenge. The objective of this study was to develop a valid and reliable instrument to measure satisfaction among health professionals in the sub-Saharan African context. METHODS: A survey was conducted in Senegal and Mali in 2011 among 962 care providers (doctors, midwives, nurses and technicians) practicing in 46 hospitals (capital, regional and district). The participation rate was very high: 97% (937/962). After exploratory factor analysis (EFA), construct validity was assessed through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The discriminant validity of our subscales was evaluated by comparing the average variance extracted (AVE) for each of the constructs with the squared interconstruct correlation (SIC), and finally for criterion validity, each subscale was tested with two hypotheses. Two dimensions of reliability were assessed: internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha subscales and stability over time using a test-retest process. RESULTS: Eight dimensions of satisfaction encompassing 24 items were identified and validated using a process that combined psychometric analyses and expert opinions: continuing education, salary and benefits, management style, tasks, work environment, workload, moral satisfaction and job stability. All eight dimensions demonstrated significant discriminant validity. The final model showed good performance, with a root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) of 0.0508 (90% CI: 0.0448 to 0.0569) and a comparative fit index (CFI) of 0.9415. The concurrent criterion validity of the eight dimensions was good. Reliability was assessed based on internal consistency, which was good for all dimensions but one (moral satisfaction < 0.70). Test-retest showed satisfactory temporal stability (intra class coefficient range: 0.60 to 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Job satisfaction is a complex construct; this study provides a multidimensional instrument whose content, construct and criterion validities were verified to ensure its suitability for the sub-Saharan African context. When using these subscales in further studies, the variability of the reliability of the subscales should be taken in to account for calculating the sample sizes. The instrument will be useful in evaluative studies which will help guide interventions aimed at improving both the quality of care and its effectiveness. BioMed Central 2013-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3704923/ /pubmed/23826720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-11-30 Text en Copyright © 2013 Faye et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Faye, Adama
Fournier, Pierre
Diop, Idrissa
Philibert, Aline
Morestin, Florence
Dumont, Alexandre
Developing a tool to measure satisfaction among health professionals in sub-Saharan Africa
title Developing a tool to measure satisfaction among health professionals in sub-Saharan Africa
title_full Developing a tool to measure satisfaction among health professionals in sub-Saharan Africa
title_fullStr Developing a tool to measure satisfaction among health professionals in sub-Saharan Africa
title_full_unstemmed Developing a tool to measure satisfaction among health professionals in sub-Saharan Africa
title_short Developing a tool to measure satisfaction among health professionals in sub-Saharan Africa
title_sort developing a tool to measure satisfaction among health professionals in sub-saharan africa
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3704923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23826720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-11-30
work_keys_str_mv AT fayeadama developingatooltomeasuresatisfactionamonghealthprofessionalsinsubsaharanafrica
AT fournierpierre developingatooltomeasuresatisfactionamonghealthprofessionalsinsubsaharanafrica
AT diopidrissa developingatooltomeasuresatisfactionamonghealthprofessionalsinsubsaharanafrica
AT philibertaline developingatooltomeasuresatisfactionamonghealthprofessionalsinsubsaharanafrica
AT morestinflorence developingatooltomeasuresatisfactionamonghealthprofessionalsinsubsaharanafrica
AT dumontalexandre developingatooltomeasuresatisfactionamonghealthprofessionalsinsubsaharanafrica