Cargando…

Effect of air flow on tubular solar still efficiency

BACKGROUND: An experimental work was reported to estimate the increase in distillate yield for a compound parabolic concentrator-concentric tubular solar still (CPC-CTSS). The CPC dramatically increases the heating of the saline water. A novel idea was proposed to study the characteristic features o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thirugnanasambantham, Arunkumar, Rajan, Jayaprakash, Ahsan, Amimul, Kandasamy, Vinothkumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3704945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23587020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1735-2746-10-31
_version_ 1782476372713668608
author Thirugnanasambantham, Arunkumar
Rajan, Jayaprakash
Ahsan, Amimul
Kandasamy, Vinothkumar
author_facet Thirugnanasambantham, Arunkumar
Rajan, Jayaprakash
Ahsan, Amimul
Kandasamy, Vinothkumar
author_sort Thirugnanasambantham, Arunkumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An experimental work was reported to estimate the increase in distillate yield for a compound parabolic concentrator-concentric tubular solar still (CPC-CTSS). The CPC dramatically increases the heating of the saline water. A novel idea was proposed to study the characteristic features of CPC for desalination to produce a large quantity of distillate yield. A rectangular basin of dimension 2 m × 0.025 m × 0.02 m was fabricated of copper and was placed at the focus of the CPC. This basin is covered by two cylindrical glass tubes of length 2 m with two different diameters of 0.02 m and 0.03 m. The experimental study was operated with two modes: without and with air flow between inner and outer tubes. The rate of air flow was fixed throughout the experiment at 4.5 m/s. On the basis of performance results, the water collection rate was 1445 ml/day without air flow and 2020 ml/day with air flow and the efficiencies were 16.2% and 18.9%, respectively. FINDINGS: The experimental study was operated with two modes: without and with air flow between inner and outer tubes. The rate of air flow was fixed throughout the experiment at 4.5 m/s. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of performance results, the water collection rate was 1445 ml/day without air flow and 2020 ml/day with air flow and the efficiencies were 16.2% and 18.9%, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3704945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37049452013-07-15 Effect of air flow on tubular solar still efficiency Thirugnanasambantham, Arunkumar Rajan, Jayaprakash Ahsan, Amimul Kandasamy, Vinothkumar Iranian J Environ Health Sci Eng Technical Note BACKGROUND: An experimental work was reported to estimate the increase in distillate yield for a compound parabolic concentrator-concentric tubular solar still (CPC-CTSS). The CPC dramatically increases the heating of the saline water. A novel idea was proposed to study the characteristic features of CPC for desalination to produce a large quantity of distillate yield. A rectangular basin of dimension 2 m × 0.025 m × 0.02 m was fabricated of copper and was placed at the focus of the CPC. This basin is covered by two cylindrical glass tubes of length 2 m with two different diameters of 0.02 m and 0.03 m. The experimental study was operated with two modes: without and with air flow between inner and outer tubes. The rate of air flow was fixed throughout the experiment at 4.5 m/s. On the basis of performance results, the water collection rate was 1445 ml/day without air flow and 2020 ml/day with air flow and the efficiencies were 16.2% and 18.9%, respectively. FINDINGS: The experimental study was operated with two modes: without and with air flow between inner and outer tubes. The rate of air flow was fixed throughout the experiment at 4.5 m/s. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of performance results, the water collection rate was 1445 ml/day without air flow and 2020 ml/day with air flow and the efficiencies were 16.2% and 18.9%, respectively. BioMed Central 2013-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3704945/ /pubmed/23587020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1735-2746-10-31 Text en Copyright © 2013 Thirugnanasambantham et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Note
Thirugnanasambantham, Arunkumar
Rajan, Jayaprakash
Ahsan, Amimul
Kandasamy, Vinothkumar
Effect of air flow on tubular solar still efficiency
title Effect of air flow on tubular solar still efficiency
title_full Effect of air flow on tubular solar still efficiency
title_fullStr Effect of air flow on tubular solar still efficiency
title_full_unstemmed Effect of air flow on tubular solar still efficiency
title_short Effect of air flow on tubular solar still efficiency
title_sort effect of air flow on tubular solar still efficiency
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3704945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23587020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1735-2746-10-31
work_keys_str_mv AT thirugnanasambanthamarunkumar effectofairflowontubularsolarstillefficiency
AT rajanjayaprakash effectofairflowontubularsolarstillefficiency
AT ahsanamimul effectofairflowontubularsolarstillefficiency
AT kandasamyvinothkumar effectofairflowontubularsolarstillefficiency