Cargando…
Effect of air flow on tubular solar still efficiency
BACKGROUND: An experimental work was reported to estimate the increase in distillate yield for a compound parabolic concentrator-concentric tubular solar still (CPC-CTSS). The CPC dramatically increases the heating of the saline water. A novel idea was proposed to study the characteristic features o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3704945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23587020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1735-2746-10-31 |
_version_ | 1782476372713668608 |
---|---|
author | Thirugnanasambantham, Arunkumar Rajan, Jayaprakash Ahsan, Amimul Kandasamy, Vinothkumar |
author_facet | Thirugnanasambantham, Arunkumar Rajan, Jayaprakash Ahsan, Amimul Kandasamy, Vinothkumar |
author_sort | Thirugnanasambantham, Arunkumar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An experimental work was reported to estimate the increase in distillate yield for a compound parabolic concentrator-concentric tubular solar still (CPC-CTSS). The CPC dramatically increases the heating of the saline water. A novel idea was proposed to study the characteristic features of CPC for desalination to produce a large quantity of distillate yield. A rectangular basin of dimension 2 m × 0.025 m × 0.02 m was fabricated of copper and was placed at the focus of the CPC. This basin is covered by two cylindrical glass tubes of length 2 m with two different diameters of 0.02 m and 0.03 m. The experimental study was operated with two modes: without and with air flow between inner and outer tubes. The rate of air flow was fixed throughout the experiment at 4.5 m/s. On the basis of performance results, the water collection rate was 1445 ml/day without air flow and 2020 ml/day with air flow and the efficiencies were 16.2% and 18.9%, respectively. FINDINGS: The experimental study was operated with two modes: without and with air flow between inner and outer tubes. The rate of air flow was fixed throughout the experiment at 4.5 m/s. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of performance results, the water collection rate was 1445 ml/day without air flow and 2020 ml/day with air flow and the efficiencies were 16.2% and 18.9%, respectively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3704945 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37049452013-07-15 Effect of air flow on tubular solar still efficiency Thirugnanasambantham, Arunkumar Rajan, Jayaprakash Ahsan, Amimul Kandasamy, Vinothkumar Iranian J Environ Health Sci Eng Technical Note BACKGROUND: An experimental work was reported to estimate the increase in distillate yield for a compound parabolic concentrator-concentric tubular solar still (CPC-CTSS). The CPC dramatically increases the heating of the saline water. A novel idea was proposed to study the characteristic features of CPC for desalination to produce a large quantity of distillate yield. A rectangular basin of dimension 2 m × 0.025 m × 0.02 m was fabricated of copper and was placed at the focus of the CPC. This basin is covered by two cylindrical glass tubes of length 2 m with two different diameters of 0.02 m and 0.03 m. The experimental study was operated with two modes: without and with air flow between inner and outer tubes. The rate of air flow was fixed throughout the experiment at 4.5 m/s. On the basis of performance results, the water collection rate was 1445 ml/day without air flow and 2020 ml/day with air flow and the efficiencies were 16.2% and 18.9%, respectively. FINDINGS: The experimental study was operated with two modes: without and with air flow between inner and outer tubes. The rate of air flow was fixed throughout the experiment at 4.5 m/s. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of performance results, the water collection rate was 1445 ml/day without air flow and 2020 ml/day with air flow and the efficiencies were 16.2% and 18.9%, respectively. BioMed Central 2013-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3704945/ /pubmed/23587020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1735-2746-10-31 Text en Copyright © 2013 Thirugnanasambantham et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Thirugnanasambantham, Arunkumar Rajan, Jayaprakash Ahsan, Amimul Kandasamy, Vinothkumar Effect of air flow on tubular solar still efficiency |
title | Effect of air flow on tubular solar still efficiency |
title_full | Effect of air flow on tubular solar still efficiency |
title_fullStr | Effect of air flow on tubular solar still efficiency |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of air flow on tubular solar still efficiency |
title_short | Effect of air flow on tubular solar still efficiency |
title_sort | effect of air flow on tubular solar still efficiency |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3704945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23587020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1735-2746-10-31 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thirugnanasambanthamarunkumar effectofairflowontubularsolarstillefficiency AT rajanjayaprakash effectofairflowontubularsolarstillefficiency AT ahsanamimul effectofairflowontubularsolarstillefficiency AT kandasamyvinothkumar effectofairflowontubularsolarstillefficiency |