Cargando…
Comparative Evaluation of [(99m)Tc]Tilmanocept for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Breast Cancer Patients: Results of Two Phase 3 Trials
BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery is used worldwide for staging breast cancer patients and helps limit axillary lymph node dissection. [(99m)Tc]Tilmanocept is a novel receptor-targeted radiopharmaceutical evaluated in 2 open-label, nonrandomized, within-patient, phase 3 trials designed t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3705144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23504141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2887-8 |
_version_ | 1782476391535607808 |
---|---|
author | Wallace, Anne M. Han, Linda K. Povoski, Stephen P. Deck, Kenneth Schneebaum, Schlomo Hall, Nathan C. Hoh, Carl K. Limmer, Karl K. Krontiras, Helen Frazier, Thomas G. Cox, Charles Avisar, Eli Faries, Mark King, Dennis W. Christman, Lori Vera, David R. |
author_facet | Wallace, Anne M. Han, Linda K. Povoski, Stephen P. Deck, Kenneth Schneebaum, Schlomo Hall, Nathan C. Hoh, Carl K. Limmer, Karl K. Krontiras, Helen Frazier, Thomas G. Cox, Charles Avisar, Eli Faries, Mark King, Dennis W. Christman, Lori Vera, David R. |
author_sort | Wallace, Anne M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery is used worldwide for staging breast cancer patients and helps limit axillary lymph node dissection. [(99m)Tc]Tilmanocept is a novel receptor-targeted radiopharmaceutical evaluated in 2 open-label, nonrandomized, within-patient, phase 3 trials designed to assess the lymphatic mapping performance. METHODS: A total of 13 centers contributed 148 patients with breast cancer. Each patient received [(99m)Tc]tilmanocept and vital blue dye (VBD). Lymph nodes identified intraoperatively as radioactive and/or blue stained were excised and histologically examined. The primary endpoint, concordance (lower boundary set point at 90 %), was the proportion of nodes detected by VBD and [(99m)Tc]tilmanocept. RESULTS: A total of 13 centers contributed 148 patients who were injected with both agents. Intraoperatively, 207 of 209 nodes detected by VBD were also detected by [(99m)Tc]tilmanocept for a concordance rate of 99.04 % (p < 0.0001). [(99m)Tc]tilmanocept detected a total of 320 nodes, of which 207 (64.7 %) were detected by VBD. [(99m)Tc]Tilmanocept detected at least 1 SLN in more patients (146) than did VBD (131, p < 0.0001). In 129 of 131 patients with ≥1 blue node, all blue nodes were radioactive. Of 33 pathology-positive nodes (18.2 % patient pathology rate), [(99m)Tc]tilmanocept detected 31 of 33, whereas VBD detected only 25 of 33 (p = 0.0312). No pathology-positive SLNs were detected exclusively by VBD. No serious adverse events were attributed to [(99m)Tc]tilmanocept. CONCLUSION: [(99m)Tc]Tilmanocept demonstrated success in detecting a SLN while meeting the primary endpoint. Interestingly, [(99m)Tc]tilmanocept was additionally noted to identify more SLNs in more patients. This localization represented a higher number of metastatic breast cancer lymph nodes than that of VBD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3705144 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37051442013-07-11 Comparative Evaluation of [(99m)Tc]Tilmanocept for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Breast Cancer Patients: Results of Two Phase 3 Trials Wallace, Anne M. Han, Linda K. Povoski, Stephen P. Deck, Kenneth Schneebaum, Schlomo Hall, Nathan C. Hoh, Carl K. Limmer, Karl K. Krontiras, Helen Frazier, Thomas G. Cox, Charles Avisar, Eli Faries, Mark King, Dennis W. Christman, Lori Vera, David R. Ann Surg Oncol Breast Oncology BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery is used worldwide for staging breast cancer patients and helps limit axillary lymph node dissection. [(99m)Tc]Tilmanocept is a novel receptor-targeted radiopharmaceutical evaluated in 2 open-label, nonrandomized, within-patient, phase 3 trials designed to assess the lymphatic mapping performance. METHODS: A total of 13 centers contributed 148 patients with breast cancer. Each patient received [(99m)Tc]tilmanocept and vital blue dye (VBD). Lymph nodes identified intraoperatively as radioactive and/or blue stained were excised and histologically examined. The primary endpoint, concordance (lower boundary set point at 90 %), was the proportion of nodes detected by VBD and [(99m)Tc]tilmanocept. RESULTS: A total of 13 centers contributed 148 patients who were injected with both agents. Intraoperatively, 207 of 209 nodes detected by VBD were also detected by [(99m)Tc]tilmanocept for a concordance rate of 99.04 % (p < 0.0001). [(99m)Tc]tilmanocept detected a total of 320 nodes, of which 207 (64.7 %) were detected by VBD. [(99m)Tc]Tilmanocept detected at least 1 SLN in more patients (146) than did VBD (131, p < 0.0001). In 129 of 131 patients with ≥1 blue node, all blue nodes were radioactive. Of 33 pathology-positive nodes (18.2 % patient pathology rate), [(99m)Tc]tilmanocept detected 31 of 33, whereas VBD detected only 25 of 33 (p = 0.0312). No pathology-positive SLNs were detected exclusively by VBD. No serious adverse events were attributed to [(99m)Tc]tilmanocept. CONCLUSION: [(99m)Tc]Tilmanocept demonstrated success in detecting a SLN while meeting the primary endpoint. Interestingly, [(99m)Tc]tilmanocept was additionally noted to identify more SLNs in more patients. This localization represented a higher number of metastatic breast cancer lymph nodes than that of VBD. Springer US 2013-03-17 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3705144/ /pubmed/23504141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2887-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Breast Oncology Wallace, Anne M. Han, Linda K. Povoski, Stephen P. Deck, Kenneth Schneebaum, Schlomo Hall, Nathan C. Hoh, Carl K. Limmer, Karl K. Krontiras, Helen Frazier, Thomas G. Cox, Charles Avisar, Eli Faries, Mark King, Dennis W. Christman, Lori Vera, David R. Comparative Evaluation of [(99m)Tc]Tilmanocept for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Breast Cancer Patients: Results of Two Phase 3 Trials |
title | Comparative Evaluation of [(99m)Tc]Tilmanocept for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Breast Cancer Patients: Results of Two Phase 3 Trials |
title_full | Comparative Evaluation of [(99m)Tc]Tilmanocept for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Breast Cancer Patients: Results of Two Phase 3 Trials |
title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of [(99m)Tc]Tilmanocept for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Breast Cancer Patients: Results of Two Phase 3 Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of [(99m)Tc]Tilmanocept for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Breast Cancer Patients: Results of Two Phase 3 Trials |
title_short | Comparative Evaluation of [(99m)Tc]Tilmanocept for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Breast Cancer Patients: Results of Two Phase 3 Trials |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of [(99m)tc]tilmanocept for sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer patients: results of two phase 3 trials |
topic | Breast Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3705144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23504141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2887-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wallaceannem comparativeevaluationof99mtctilmanoceptforsentinellymphnodemappinginbreastcancerpatientsresultsoftwophase3trials AT hanlindak comparativeevaluationof99mtctilmanoceptforsentinellymphnodemappinginbreastcancerpatientsresultsoftwophase3trials AT povoskistephenp comparativeevaluationof99mtctilmanoceptforsentinellymphnodemappinginbreastcancerpatientsresultsoftwophase3trials AT deckkenneth comparativeevaluationof99mtctilmanoceptforsentinellymphnodemappinginbreastcancerpatientsresultsoftwophase3trials AT schneebaumschlomo comparativeevaluationof99mtctilmanoceptforsentinellymphnodemappinginbreastcancerpatientsresultsoftwophase3trials AT hallnathanc comparativeevaluationof99mtctilmanoceptforsentinellymphnodemappinginbreastcancerpatientsresultsoftwophase3trials AT hohcarlk comparativeevaluationof99mtctilmanoceptforsentinellymphnodemappinginbreastcancerpatientsresultsoftwophase3trials AT limmerkarlk comparativeevaluationof99mtctilmanoceptforsentinellymphnodemappinginbreastcancerpatientsresultsoftwophase3trials AT krontirashelen comparativeevaluationof99mtctilmanoceptforsentinellymphnodemappinginbreastcancerpatientsresultsoftwophase3trials AT frazierthomasg comparativeevaluationof99mtctilmanoceptforsentinellymphnodemappinginbreastcancerpatientsresultsoftwophase3trials AT coxcharles comparativeevaluationof99mtctilmanoceptforsentinellymphnodemappinginbreastcancerpatientsresultsoftwophase3trials AT avisareli comparativeevaluationof99mtctilmanoceptforsentinellymphnodemappinginbreastcancerpatientsresultsoftwophase3trials AT fariesmark comparativeevaluationof99mtctilmanoceptforsentinellymphnodemappinginbreastcancerpatientsresultsoftwophase3trials AT kingdennisw comparativeevaluationof99mtctilmanoceptforsentinellymphnodemappinginbreastcancerpatientsresultsoftwophase3trials AT christmanlori comparativeevaluationof99mtctilmanoceptforsentinellymphnodemappinginbreastcancerpatientsresultsoftwophase3trials AT veradavidr comparativeevaluationof99mtctilmanoceptforsentinellymphnodemappinginbreastcancerpatientsresultsoftwophase3trials |