Cargando…

Effect of Pupil Size on Optical Quality Parameters in Astigmatic Eyes Using a Double-Pass Instrument

Purpose. To objectively determine the effects of pupil size on optical quality parameters in astigmatic eyes using a double-pass instrument. Methods. We examined twenty-two eyes of 22 healthy volunteers (mean age ± standard deviation, 27.1 ± 2.8 years) who had no ophthalmic diseases other than refra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kobashi, Hidenaga, Kamiya, Kazutaka, Yanome, Kyohei, Igarashi, Akihito, Shimizu, Kimiya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3706062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23865038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/124327
_version_ 1782476508376334336
author Kobashi, Hidenaga
Kamiya, Kazutaka
Yanome, Kyohei
Igarashi, Akihito
Shimizu, Kimiya
author_facet Kobashi, Hidenaga
Kamiya, Kazutaka
Yanome, Kyohei
Igarashi, Akihito
Shimizu, Kimiya
author_sort Kobashi, Hidenaga
collection PubMed
description Purpose. To objectively determine the effects of pupil size on optical quality parameters in astigmatic eyes using a double-pass instrument. Methods. We examined twenty-two eyes of 22 healthy volunteers (mean age ± standard deviation, 27.1 ± 2.8 years) who had no ophthalmic diseases other than refractive errors (manifest cylinder ≤0.25 diopters (D)). After we fully corrected cycloplegic refraction, we created with-the-rule astigma tism of 1, 2, and 3 diopters in these eyes and then quantitatively assessed the modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff frequency and the Strehl2D ratio with 2-, 4-, and 6-mm pupil sizes using the Optical Quality Analysis System. Results. The MTF cutoff frequency and the Strehl2D ratio decreased significantly as the amount of astigmatism increased at each pupil size (P < 0.001 for 2, 4, and 6 mm, analysis of variance). They also decreased significantly with an increase in pupil size at each diopter of astigmatism (P < 0.001 for 0, 1, 2, and 3 D). Multiple comparisons demonstrated a significant difference between measurements made for a 2-mm pupil and for a 6-mm pupil at each diopter of astigmatism (P < 0.001 for 0, 1, 2, and 3 D, Dunnett test) and those made for a 4-mm pupil and for a 6-mm pupil at each diopter of astigmatism (P < 0.001 for 0 D, P < 0.05 1, 2, and 3 D). Conclusions. Eyes with larger pupils had lower optical quality even when they were astigmatic. It may be necessary to correct the preexisting astigmatism to acquire excellent visual performance, especially in astigmatic eyes with larger pupils.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3706062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37060622013-07-17 Effect of Pupil Size on Optical Quality Parameters in Astigmatic Eyes Using a Double-Pass Instrument Kobashi, Hidenaga Kamiya, Kazutaka Yanome, Kyohei Igarashi, Akihito Shimizu, Kimiya Biomed Res Int Clinical Study Purpose. To objectively determine the effects of pupil size on optical quality parameters in astigmatic eyes using a double-pass instrument. Methods. We examined twenty-two eyes of 22 healthy volunteers (mean age ± standard deviation, 27.1 ± 2.8 years) who had no ophthalmic diseases other than refractive errors (manifest cylinder ≤0.25 diopters (D)). After we fully corrected cycloplegic refraction, we created with-the-rule astigma tism of 1, 2, and 3 diopters in these eyes and then quantitatively assessed the modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff frequency and the Strehl2D ratio with 2-, 4-, and 6-mm pupil sizes using the Optical Quality Analysis System. Results. The MTF cutoff frequency and the Strehl2D ratio decreased significantly as the amount of astigmatism increased at each pupil size (P < 0.001 for 2, 4, and 6 mm, analysis of variance). They also decreased significantly with an increase in pupil size at each diopter of astigmatism (P < 0.001 for 0, 1, 2, and 3 D). Multiple comparisons demonstrated a significant difference between measurements made for a 2-mm pupil and for a 6-mm pupil at each diopter of astigmatism (P < 0.001 for 0, 1, 2, and 3 D, Dunnett test) and those made for a 4-mm pupil and for a 6-mm pupil at each diopter of astigmatism (P < 0.001 for 0 D, P < 0.05 1, 2, and 3 D). Conclusions. Eyes with larger pupils had lower optical quality even when they were astigmatic. It may be necessary to correct the preexisting astigmatism to acquire excellent visual performance, especially in astigmatic eyes with larger pupils. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3706062/ /pubmed/23865038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/124327 Text en Copyright © 2013 Hidenaga Kobashi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Kobashi, Hidenaga
Kamiya, Kazutaka
Yanome, Kyohei
Igarashi, Akihito
Shimizu, Kimiya
Effect of Pupil Size on Optical Quality Parameters in Astigmatic Eyes Using a Double-Pass Instrument
title Effect of Pupil Size on Optical Quality Parameters in Astigmatic Eyes Using a Double-Pass Instrument
title_full Effect of Pupil Size on Optical Quality Parameters in Astigmatic Eyes Using a Double-Pass Instrument
title_fullStr Effect of Pupil Size on Optical Quality Parameters in Astigmatic Eyes Using a Double-Pass Instrument
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Pupil Size on Optical Quality Parameters in Astigmatic Eyes Using a Double-Pass Instrument
title_short Effect of Pupil Size on Optical Quality Parameters in Astigmatic Eyes Using a Double-Pass Instrument
title_sort effect of pupil size on optical quality parameters in astigmatic eyes using a double-pass instrument
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3706062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23865038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/124327
work_keys_str_mv AT kobashihidenaga effectofpupilsizeonopticalqualityparametersinastigmaticeyesusingadoublepassinstrument
AT kamiyakazutaka effectofpupilsizeonopticalqualityparametersinastigmaticeyesusingadoublepassinstrument
AT yanomekyohei effectofpupilsizeonopticalqualityparametersinastigmaticeyesusingadoublepassinstrument
AT igarashiakihito effectofpupilsizeonopticalqualityparametersinastigmaticeyesusingadoublepassinstrument
AT shimizukimiya effectofpupilsizeonopticalqualityparametersinastigmaticeyesusingadoublepassinstrument