Cargando…

Probing the Frontostriatal Loops Involved in Executive and Limbic Processing via Interleaved TMS and Functional MRI at Two Prefrontal Locations: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND: The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is an anatomically and functionally heterogeneous area which influences cognitive and limbic processing through connectivity to subcortical targets. As proposed by Alexander et al. (1986) the lateral and medial aspects of the PFC project to distinct areas of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanlon, Colleen A., Canterberry, Melanie, Taylor, Joseph J., DeVries, William, Li, Xingbao, Brown, Truman R., George, Mark S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3706588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23874466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067917
_version_ 1782476573330374656
author Hanlon, Colleen A.
Canterberry, Melanie
Taylor, Joseph J.
DeVries, William
Li, Xingbao
Brown, Truman R.
George, Mark S.
author_facet Hanlon, Colleen A.
Canterberry, Melanie
Taylor, Joseph J.
DeVries, William
Li, Xingbao
Brown, Truman R.
George, Mark S.
author_sort Hanlon, Colleen A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is an anatomically and functionally heterogeneous area which influences cognitive and limbic processing through connectivity to subcortical targets. As proposed by Alexander et al. (1986) the lateral and medial aspects of the PFC project to distinct areas of the striatum in parallel but functionally distinct circuits. The purpose of this preliminary study was to determine if we could differentially and consistently activate these lateral and medial cortical-subcortical circuits involved in executive and limbic processing though interleaved transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in the MR environment. METHODS: Seventeen healthy individuals received interleaved TMS-BOLD imaging with the coil positioned over the dorsolateral (EEG: F3) and ventromedial PFC (EEG: FP1). BOLD signal change was calculated in the areas directly stimulated by the coil and in subcortical regions with afferent and efferent connectivity to the TMS target areas. Additionally, five individuals were tested on two occasions to determine test-retest reliability. RESULTS: Region of interest analysis revealed that TMS at both prefrontal sites led to significant BOLD signal increases in the cortex under the coil, in the striatum, and the thalamus, but not in the visual cortex (negative control region). There was a significantly larger BOLD signal change in the caudate following medial PFC TMS, relative to lateral TMS. The hippocampus in contrast was significantly more activated by lateral TMS. Post-hoc voxel-based analysis revealed that within the caudate the location of peak activity was in the ventral caudate following medial TMS and the dorsal caudate following lateral TMS. Test-retest reliability data revealed consistent BOLD responses to TMS within each individual but a large variation between individuals. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that, through an optimized TMS/BOLD sequence over two unique prefrontal targets, it is possible to selectively interrogate the patency of these established cortical-subcortical networks in healthy individuals, and potentially patient populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3706588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37065882013-07-19 Probing the Frontostriatal Loops Involved in Executive and Limbic Processing via Interleaved TMS and Functional MRI at Two Prefrontal Locations: A Pilot Study Hanlon, Colleen A. Canterberry, Melanie Taylor, Joseph J. DeVries, William Li, Xingbao Brown, Truman R. George, Mark S. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is an anatomically and functionally heterogeneous area which influences cognitive and limbic processing through connectivity to subcortical targets. As proposed by Alexander et al. (1986) the lateral and medial aspects of the PFC project to distinct areas of the striatum in parallel but functionally distinct circuits. The purpose of this preliminary study was to determine if we could differentially and consistently activate these lateral and medial cortical-subcortical circuits involved in executive and limbic processing though interleaved transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in the MR environment. METHODS: Seventeen healthy individuals received interleaved TMS-BOLD imaging with the coil positioned over the dorsolateral (EEG: F3) and ventromedial PFC (EEG: FP1). BOLD signal change was calculated in the areas directly stimulated by the coil and in subcortical regions with afferent and efferent connectivity to the TMS target areas. Additionally, five individuals were tested on two occasions to determine test-retest reliability. RESULTS: Region of interest analysis revealed that TMS at both prefrontal sites led to significant BOLD signal increases in the cortex under the coil, in the striatum, and the thalamus, but not in the visual cortex (negative control region). There was a significantly larger BOLD signal change in the caudate following medial PFC TMS, relative to lateral TMS. The hippocampus in contrast was significantly more activated by lateral TMS. Post-hoc voxel-based analysis revealed that within the caudate the location of peak activity was in the ventral caudate following medial TMS and the dorsal caudate following lateral TMS. Test-retest reliability data revealed consistent BOLD responses to TMS within each individual but a large variation between individuals. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that, through an optimized TMS/BOLD sequence over two unique prefrontal targets, it is possible to selectively interrogate the patency of these established cortical-subcortical networks in healthy individuals, and potentially patient populations. Public Library of Science 2013-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3706588/ /pubmed/23874466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067917 Text en © 2013 Hanlon et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hanlon, Colleen A.
Canterberry, Melanie
Taylor, Joseph J.
DeVries, William
Li, Xingbao
Brown, Truman R.
George, Mark S.
Probing the Frontostriatal Loops Involved in Executive and Limbic Processing via Interleaved TMS and Functional MRI at Two Prefrontal Locations: A Pilot Study
title Probing the Frontostriatal Loops Involved in Executive and Limbic Processing via Interleaved TMS and Functional MRI at Two Prefrontal Locations: A Pilot Study
title_full Probing the Frontostriatal Loops Involved in Executive and Limbic Processing via Interleaved TMS and Functional MRI at Two Prefrontal Locations: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr Probing the Frontostriatal Loops Involved in Executive and Limbic Processing via Interleaved TMS and Functional MRI at Two Prefrontal Locations: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Probing the Frontostriatal Loops Involved in Executive and Limbic Processing via Interleaved TMS and Functional MRI at Two Prefrontal Locations: A Pilot Study
title_short Probing the Frontostriatal Loops Involved in Executive and Limbic Processing via Interleaved TMS and Functional MRI at Two Prefrontal Locations: A Pilot Study
title_sort probing the frontostriatal loops involved in executive and limbic processing via interleaved tms and functional mri at two prefrontal locations: a pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3706588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23874466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067917
work_keys_str_mv AT hanloncolleena probingthefrontostriatalloopsinvolvedinexecutiveandlimbicprocessingviainterleavedtmsandfunctionalmriattwoprefrontallocationsapilotstudy
AT canterberrymelanie probingthefrontostriatalloopsinvolvedinexecutiveandlimbicprocessingviainterleavedtmsandfunctionalmriattwoprefrontallocationsapilotstudy
AT taylorjosephj probingthefrontostriatalloopsinvolvedinexecutiveandlimbicprocessingviainterleavedtmsandfunctionalmriattwoprefrontallocationsapilotstudy
AT devrieswilliam probingthefrontostriatalloopsinvolvedinexecutiveandlimbicprocessingviainterleavedtmsandfunctionalmriattwoprefrontallocationsapilotstudy
AT lixingbao probingthefrontostriatalloopsinvolvedinexecutiveandlimbicprocessingviainterleavedtmsandfunctionalmriattwoprefrontallocationsapilotstudy
AT browntrumanr probingthefrontostriatalloopsinvolvedinexecutiveandlimbicprocessingviainterleavedtmsandfunctionalmriattwoprefrontallocationsapilotstudy
AT georgemarks probingthefrontostriatalloopsinvolvedinexecutiveandlimbicprocessingviainterleavedtmsandfunctionalmriattwoprefrontallocationsapilotstudy