Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of male osteoporosis

SUMMARY: The results of this study suggest that, under the assumption of same relative risk reduction of fractures in men as for women, strontium ranelate could be considered a cost-effective strategy compared with no treatment for the treatment of osteoporotic men from a Belgian healthcare payer pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hiligsmann, M., Ben Sedrine, W., Bruyère, O., Reginster, J.-Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3706715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23371359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2272-2
_version_ 1782276389527879680
author Hiligsmann, M.
Ben Sedrine, W.
Bruyère, O.
Reginster, J.-Y.
author_facet Hiligsmann, M.
Ben Sedrine, W.
Bruyère, O.
Reginster, J.-Y.
author_sort Hiligsmann, M.
collection PubMed
description SUMMARY: The results of this study suggest that, under the assumption of same relative risk reduction of fractures in men as for women, strontium ranelate could be considered a cost-effective strategy compared with no treatment for the treatment of osteoporotic men from a Belgian healthcare payer perspective. INTRODUCTION: This study was conducted to estimate the cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of osteoporotic men. METHODS: A previously validated Markov microsimulation model was adapted to estimate the cost (€2,010) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained of strontium ranelate compared with no treatment. Similar efficacy data on lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) between men with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture (MALEO Trial) and postmenopausal osteoporotic women (pivotal SOTI, TROPOS trials) supports the assumption, in the base-case analysis, of the same relative risk reduction of fractures in men as for women. Analyses were conducted, from a Belgian healthcare payer perspective, in the population from the MALEO Trial who is a men population with a mean age of 73 years, and BMD T-score ≤−2.5 or prevalent vertebral fracture (PVF). RESULTS: In the MALEO population, strontium ranelate compared with no treatment was estimated at €49,798 and €25,584 per QALY gained using efficacy data from the intent-to-treat analysis and the per-protocol analysis including only adherent patients, respectively. In men with a BMD T-score ≤−2.5 or with PVF, the cost per QALY gained of strontium ranelate fall below thresholds of €45,000 and €25,000 per QALY gained based on efficacy data from the entire population of the clinical trial and from the per-protocol analyses, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that, under the assumption of same relative risk reduction of fractures in men as for women, strontium ranelate could be considered cost-effective compared with no treatment for male osteoporosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3706715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37067152013-07-12 Cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of male osteoporosis Hiligsmann, M. Ben Sedrine, W. Bruyère, O. Reginster, J.-Y. Osteoporos Int Original Article SUMMARY: The results of this study suggest that, under the assumption of same relative risk reduction of fractures in men as for women, strontium ranelate could be considered a cost-effective strategy compared with no treatment for the treatment of osteoporotic men from a Belgian healthcare payer perspective. INTRODUCTION: This study was conducted to estimate the cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of osteoporotic men. METHODS: A previously validated Markov microsimulation model was adapted to estimate the cost (€2,010) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained of strontium ranelate compared with no treatment. Similar efficacy data on lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) between men with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture (MALEO Trial) and postmenopausal osteoporotic women (pivotal SOTI, TROPOS trials) supports the assumption, in the base-case analysis, of the same relative risk reduction of fractures in men as for women. Analyses were conducted, from a Belgian healthcare payer perspective, in the population from the MALEO Trial who is a men population with a mean age of 73 years, and BMD T-score ≤−2.5 or prevalent vertebral fracture (PVF). RESULTS: In the MALEO population, strontium ranelate compared with no treatment was estimated at €49,798 and €25,584 per QALY gained using efficacy data from the intent-to-treat analysis and the per-protocol analysis including only adherent patients, respectively. In men with a BMD T-score ≤−2.5 or with PVF, the cost per QALY gained of strontium ranelate fall below thresholds of €45,000 and €25,000 per QALY gained based on efficacy data from the entire population of the clinical trial and from the per-protocol analyses, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that, under the assumption of same relative risk reduction of fractures in men as for women, strontium ranelate could be considered cost-effective compared with no treatment for male osteoporosis. Springer London 2013-02-01 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3706715/ /pubmed/23371359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2272-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hiligsmann, M.
Ben Sedrine, W.
Bruyère, O.
Reginster, J.-Y.
Cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of male osteoporosis
title Cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of male osteoporosis
title_full Cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of male osteoporosis
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of male osteoporosis
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of male osteoporosis
title_short Cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of male osteoporosis
title_sort cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of male osteoporosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3706715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23371359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2272-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hiligsmannm costeffectivenessofstrontiumranelateinthetreatmentofmaleosteoporosis
AT bensedrinew costeffectivenessofstrontiumranelateinthetreatmentofmaleosteoporosis
AT bruyereo costeffectivenessofstrontiumranelateinthetreatmentofmaleosteoporosis
AT reginsterjy costeffectivenessofstrontiumranelateinthetreatmentofmaleosteoporosis