Cargando…

Mammographic density and breast cancer: a comparison of related and unrelated controls in the Breast Cancer Family Registry

INTRODUCTION: Percent mammographic density (PMD) is a strong and highly heritable risk factor for breast cancer. Studies of the role of PMD in familial breast cancer may require controls, such as the sisters of cases, selected from the same 'risk set' as the cases. The use of sister contro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Linton, Linda, Martin, Lisa J, Li, Qing, Huszti, Ella, Minkin, Salomon, John, Esther M, Rommens, Johanna, Paterson, Andrew D, Boyd, Norman F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3706877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23705888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr3430
_version_ 1782276425224552448
author Linton, Linda
Martin, Lisa J
Li, Qing
Huszti, Ella
Minkin, Salomon
John, Esther M
Rommens, Johanna
Paterson, Andrew D
Boyd, Norman F
author_facet Linton, Linda
Martin, Lisa J
Li, Qing
Huszti, Ella
Minkin, Salomon
John, Esther M
Rommens, Johanna
Paterson, Andrew D
Boyd, Norman F
author_sort Linton, Linda
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Percent mammographic density (PMD) is a strong and highly heritable risk factor for breast cancer. Studies of the role of PMD in familial breast cancer may require controls, such as the sisters of cases, selected from the same 'risk set' as the cases. The use of sister controls would allow control for factors that have been shown to influence risk of breast cancer such as race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status and a family history of breast cancer, but may introduce 'overmatching' and attenuate case-control differences in PMD. METHODS: To examine the potential effects of using sister controls rather than unrelated controls in a case-control study, we examined PMD in triplets, each comprised of a case with invasive breast cancer, an unaffected full sister control, and an unaffected unrelated control. Both controls were matched to cases on age at mammogram. Total breast area and dense area in the mammogram were measured in the unaffected breast of cases and a randomly selected breast in controls, and the non-dense area and PMD calculated from these measurements. RESULTS: The mean difference in PMD between cases and controls, and the standard deviation (SD) of the difference, were slightly less for sister controls (4.2% (SD = 20.0)) than for unrelated controls (4.9% (SD = 25.7)). We found statistically significant correlations in PMD between cases (n = 228) and sister controls (n = 228) (r = 0.39 (95% CI: 0.28, 0.50; P <0.0001)), but not between cases and unrelated controls (n = 228) (r = 0.04 (95% CI: -0.09, 0.17; P = 0.51)). After adjusting for other risk factors, square root transformed PMD was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer when comparing cases to sister controls (adjusted odds ratio (inter-quintile odds ratio (IQOR) = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.20, 4.00) or to unrelated controls (adjusted IQOR = 2.62, 95% CI = 1.62, 4.25). CONCLUSIONS: The use of sister controls in case-control studies of PMD resulted in a modest attenuation of case-control differences and risk estimates, but showed a statistically significant association with risk and allowed control for race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status and family history.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3706877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37068772013-07-11 Mammographic density and breast cancer: a comparison of related and unrelated controls in the Breast Cancer Family Registry Linton, Linda Martin, Lisa J Li, Qing Huszti, Ella Minkin, Salomon John, Esther M Rommens, Johanna Paterson, Andrew D Boyd, Norman F Breast Cancer Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: Percent mammographic density (PMD) is a strong and highly heritable risk factor for breast cancer. Studies of the role of PMD in familial breast cancer may require controls, such as the sisters of cases, selected from the same 'risk set' as the cases. The use of sister controls would allow control for factors that have been shown to influence risk of breast cancer such as race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status and a family history of breast cancer, but may introduce 'overmatching' and attenuate case-control differences in PMD. METHODS: To examine the potential effects of using sister controls rather than unrelated controls in a case-control study, we examined PMD in triplets, each comprised of a case with invasive breast cancer, an unaffected full sister control, and an unaffected unrelated control. Both controls were matched to cases on age at mammogram. Total breast area and dense area in the mammogram were measured in the unaffected breast of cases and a randomly selected breast in controls, and the non-dense area and PMD calculated from these measurements. RESULTS: The mean difference in PMD between cases and controls, and the standard deviation (SD) of the difference, were slightly less for sister controls (4.2% (SD = 20.0)) than for unrelated controls (4.9% (SD = 25.7)). We found statistically significant correlations in PMD between cases (n = 228) and sister controls (n = 228) (r = 0.39 (95% CI: 0.28, 0.50; P <0.0001)), but not between cases and unrelated controls (n = 228) (r = 0.04 (95% CI: -0.09, 0.17; P = 0.51)). After adjusting for other risk factors, square root transformed PMD was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer when comparing cases to sister controls (adjusted odds ratio (inter-quintile odds ratio (IQOR) = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.20, 4.00) or to unrelated controls (adjusted IQOR = 2.62, 95% CI = 1.62, 4.25). CONCLUSIONS: The use of sister controls in case-control studies of PMD resulted in a modest attenuation of case-control differences and risk estimates, but showed a statistically significant association with risk and allowed control for race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status and family history. BioMed Central 2013 2013-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3706877/ /pubmed/23705888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr3430 Text en Copyright © 2013 Linton et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Linton, Linda
Martin, Lisa J
Li, Qing
Huszti, Ella
Minkin, Salomon
John, Esther M
Rommens, Johanna
Paterson, Andrew D
Boyd, Norman F
Mammographic density and breast cancer: a comparison of related and unrelated controls in the Breast Cancer Family Registry
title Mammographic density and breast cancer: a comparison of related and unrelated controls in the Breast Cancer Family Registry
title_full Mammographic density and breast cancer: a comparison of related and unrelated controls in the Breast Cancer Family Registry
title_fullStr Mammographic density and breast cancer: a comparison of related and unrelated controls in the Breast Cancer Family Registry
title_full_unstemmed Mammographic density and breast cancer: a comparison of related and unrelated controls in the Breast Cancer Family Registry
title_short Mammographic density and breast cancer: a comparison of related and unrelated controls in the Breast Cancer Family Registry
title_sort mammographic density and breast cancer: a comparison of related and unrelated controls in the breast cancer family registry
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3706877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23705888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr3430
work_keys_str_mv AT lintonlinda mammographicdensityandbreastcanceracomparisonofrelatedandunrelatedcontrolsinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry
AT martinlisaj mammographicdensityandbreastcanceracomparisonofrelatedandunrelatedcontrolsinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry
AT liqing mammographicdensityandbreastcanceracomparisonofrelatedandunrelatedcontrolsinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry
AT husztiella mammographicdensityandbreastcanceracomparisonofrelatedandunrelatedcontrolsinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry
AT minkinsalomon mammographicdensityandbreastcanceracomparisonofrelatedandunrelatedcontrolsinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry
AT johnestherm mammographicdensityandbreastcanceracomparisonofrelatedandunrelatedcontrolsinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry
AT rommensjohanna mammographicdensityandbreastcanceracomparisonofrelatedandunrelatedcontrolsinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry
AT patersonandrewd mammographicdensityandbreastcanceracomparisonofrelatedandunrelatedcontrolsinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry
AT boydnormanf mammographicdensityandbreastcanceracomparisonofrelatedandunrelatedcontrolsinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry