Cargando…
Mammographic density and breast cancer: a comparison of related and unrelated controls in the Breast Cancer Family Registry
INTRODUCTION: Percent mammographic density (PMD) is a strong and highly heritable risk factor for breast cancer. Studies of the role of PMD in familial breast cancer may require controls, such as the sisters of cases, selected from the same 'risk set' as the cases. The use of sister contro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3706877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23705888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr3430 |
_version_ | 1782276425224552448 |
---|---|
author | Linton, Linda Martin, Lisa J Li, Qing Huszti, Ella Minkin, Salomon John, Esther M Rommens, Johanna Paterson, Andrew D Boyd, Norman F |
author_facet | Linton, Linda Martin, Lisa J Li, Qing Huszti, Ella Minkin, Salomon John, Esther M Rommens, Johanna Paterson, Andrew D Boyd, Norman F |
author_sort | Linton, Linda |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Percent mammographic density (PMD) is a strong and highly heritable risk factor for breast cancer. Studies of the role of PMD in familial breast cancer may require controls, such as the sisters of cases, selected from the same 'risk set' as the cases. The use of sister controls would allow control for factors that have been shown to influence risk of breast cancer such as race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status and a family history of breast cancer, but may introduce 'overmatching' and attenuate case-control differences in PMD. METHODS: To examine the potential effects of using sister controls rather than unrelated controls in a case-control study, we examined PMD in triplets, each comprised of a case with invasive breast cancer, an unaffected full sister control, and an unaffected unrelated control. Both controls were matched to cases on age at mammogram. Total breast area and dense area in the mammogram were measured in the unaffected breast of cases and a randomly selected breast in controls, and the non-dense area and PMD calculated from these measurements. RESULTS: The mean difference in PMD between cases and controls, and the standard deviation (SD) of the difference, were slightly less for sister controls (4.2% (SD = 20.0)) than for unrelated controls (4.9% (SD = 25.7)). We found statistically significant correlations in PMD between cases (n = 228) and sister controls (n = 228) (r = 0.39 (95% CI: 0.28, 0.50; P <0.0001)), but not between cases and unrelated controls (n = 228) (r = 0.04 (95% CI: -0.09, 0.17; P = 0.51)). After adjusting for other risk factors, square root transformed PMD was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer when comparing cases to sister controls (adjusted odds ratio (inter-quintile odds ratio (IQOR) = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.20, 4.00) or to unrelated controls (adjusted IQOR = 2.62, 95% CI = 1.62, 4.25). CONCLUSIONS: The use of sister controls in case-control studies of PMD resulted in a modest attenuation of case-control differences and risk estimates, but showed a statistically significant association with risk and allowed control for race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status and family history. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3706877 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37068772013-07-11 Mammographic density and breast cancer: a comparison of related and unrelated controls in the Breast Cancer Family Registry Linton, Linda Martin, Lisa J Li, Qing Huszti, Ella Minkin, Salomon John, Esther M Rommens, Johanna Paterson, Andrew D Boyd, Norman F Breast Cancer Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: Percent mammographic density (PMD) is a strong and highly heritable risk factor for breast cancer. Studies of the role of PMD in familial breast cancer may require controls, such as the sisters of cases, selected from the same 'risk set' as the cases. The use of sister controls would allow control for factors that have been shown to influence risk of breast cancer such as race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status and a family history of breast cancer, but may introduce 'overmatching' and attenuate case-control differences in PMD. METHODS: To examine the potential effects of using sister controls rather than unrelated controls in a case-control study, we examined PMD in triplets, each comprised of a case with invasive breast cancer, an unaffected full sister control, and an unaffected unrelated control. Both controls were matched to cases on age at mammogram. Total breast area and dense area in the mammogram were measured in the unaffected breast of cases and a randomly selected breast in controls, and the non-dense area and PMD calculated from these measurements. RESULTS: The mean difference in PMD between cases and controls, and the standard deviation (SD) of the difference, were slightly less for sister controls (4.2% (SD = 20.0)) than for unrelated controls (4.9% (SD = 25.7)). We found statistically significant correlations in PMD between cases (n = 228) and sister controls (n = 228) (r = 0.39 (95% CI: 0.28, 0.50; P <0.0001)), but not between cases and unrelated controls (n = 228) (r = 0.04 (95% CI: -0.09, 0.17; P = 0.51)). After adjusting for other risk factors, square root transformed PMD was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer when comparing cases to sister controls (adjusted odds ratio (inter-quintile odds ratio (IQOR) = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.20, 4.00) or to unrelated controls (adjusted IQOR = 2.62, 95% CI = 1.62, 4.25). CONCLUSIONS: The use of sister controls in case-control studies of PMD resulted in a modest attenuation of case-control differences and risk estimates, but showed a statistically significant association with risk and allowed control for race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status and family history. BioMed Central 2013 2013-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3706877/ /pubmed/23705888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr3430 Text en Copyright © 2013 Linton et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Linton, Linda Martin, Lisa J Li, Qing Huszti, Ella Minkin, Salomon John, Esther M Rommens, Johanna Paterson, Andrew D Boyd, Norman F Mammographic density and breast cancer: a comparison of related and unrelated controls in the Breast Cancer Family Registry |
title | Mammographic density and breast cancer: a comparison of related and unrelated controls in the Breast Cancer Family Registry |
title_full | Mammographic density and breast cancer: a comparison of related and unrelated controls in the Breast Cancer Family Registry |
title_fullStr | Mammographic density and breast cancer: a comparison of related and unrelated controls in the Breast Cancer Family Registry |
title_full_unstemmed | Mammographic density and breast cancer: a comparison of related and unrelated controls in the Breast Cancer Family Registry |
title_short | Mammographic density and breast cancer: a comparison of related and unrelated controls in the Breast Cancer Family Registry |
title_sort | mammographic density and breast cancer: a comparison of related and unrelated controls in the breast cancer family registry |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3706877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23705888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr3430 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lintonlinda mammographicdensityandbreastcanceracomparisonofrelatedandunrelatedcontrolsinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry AT martinlisaj mammographicdensityandbreastcanceracomparisonofrelatedandunrelatedcontrolsinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry AT liqing mammographicdensityandbreastcanceracomparisonofrelatedandunrelatedcontrolsinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry AT husztiella mammographicdensityandbreastcanceracomparisonofrelatedandunrelatedcontrolsinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry AT minkinsalomon mammographicdensityandbreastcanceracomparisonofrelatedandunrelatedcontrolsinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry AT johnestherm mammographicdensityandbreastcanceracomparisonofrelatedandunrelatedcontrolsinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry AT rommensjohanna mammographicdensityandbreastcanceracomparisonofrelatedandunrelatedcontrolsinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry AT patersonandrewd mammographicdensityandbreastcanceracomparisonofrelatedandunrelatedcontrolsinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry AT boydnormanf mammographicdensityandbreastcanceracomparisonofrelatedandunrelatedcontrolsinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry |