Cargando…

Is sodium chloride worth its salt?

The choice of fluid for resuscitation of the brain-injured patient remains controversial, and the 'ideal' resuscitation fluid has yet to be identified. Large volumes of hypotonic solutions must be avoided because of the risk of cerebral swelling and intracranial hypertension. Traditionally...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McIntosh, Euan, Andrews, Peter J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3707023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23759127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12732
_version_ 1782276454551126016
author McIntosh, Euan
Andrews, Peter J
author_facet McIntosh, Euan
Andrews, Peter J
author_sort McIntosh, Euan
collection PubMed
description The choice of fluid for resuscitation of the brain-injured patient remains controversial, and the 'ideal' resuscitation fluid has yet to be identified. Large volumes of hypotonic solutions must be avoided because of the risk of cerebral swelling and intracranial hypertension. Traditionally, 0.9% sodium chloride has been used in patients at risk of intracranial hypertension, but there is increasing recognition that 0.9% saline is not without its problems. Roquilly and colleagues show a reduction in the development of hyperchloremic acidosis in brain-injured patients given 'balanced' solutions for maintenance and resuscitation compared with 0.9% sodium chloride. In this commentary, we explore the idea that we should move away from 0.9% sodium chloride in favor of a more 'physiological' solution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3707023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37070232014-06-11 Is sodium chloride worth its salt? McIntosh, Euan Andrews, Peter J Crit Care Commentary The choice of fluid for resuscitation of the brain-injured patient remains controversial, and the 'ideal' resuscitation fluid has yet to be identified. Large volumes of hypotonic solutions must be avoided because of the risk of cerebral swelling and intracranial hypertension. Traditionally, 0.9% sodium chloride has been used in patients at risk of intracranial hypertension, but there is increasing recognition that 0.9% saline is not without its problems. Roquilly and colleagues show a reduction in the development of hyperchloremic acidosis in brain-injured patients given 'balanced' solutions for maintenance and resuscitation compared with 0.9% sodium chloride. In this commentary, we explore the idea that we should move away from 0.9% sodium chloride in favor of a more 'physiological' solution. BioMed Central 2013 2013-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3707023/ /pubmed/23759127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12732 Text en Copyright © 2013 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
McIntosh, Euan
Andrews, Peter J
Is sodium chloride worth its salt?
title Is sodium chloride worth its salt?
title_full Is sodium chloride worth its salt?
title_fullStr Is sodium chloride worth its salt?
title_full_unstemmed Is sodium chloride worth its salt?
title_short Is sodium chloride worth its salt?
title_sort is sodium chloride worth its salt?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3707023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23759127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12732
work_keys_str_mv AT mcintosheuan issodiumchlorideworthitssalt
AT andrewspeterj issodiumchlorideworthitssalt