Cargando…

The emergence of top-down proteomics in clinical research

Proteomic technology has advanced steadily since the development of 'soft-ionization' techniques for mass-spectrometry-based molecular identification more than two decades ago. Now, the large-scale analysis of proteins (proteomics) is a mainstay of biological research and clinical translat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Savaryn, John P, Catherman, Adam D, Thomas, Paul M, Abecassis, Michael M, Kelleher, Neil L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3707033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23806018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gm457
_version_ 1782276456857993216
author Savaryn, John P
Catherman, Adam D
Thomas, Paul M
Abecassis, Michael M
Kelleher, Neil L
author_facet Savaryn, John P
Catherman, Adam D
Thomas, Paul M
Abecassis, Michael M
Kelleher, Neil L
author_sort Savaryn, John P
collection PubMed
description Proteomic technology has advanced steadily since the development of 'soft-ionization' techniques for mass-spectrometry-based molecular identification more than two decades ago. Now, the large-scale analysis of proteins (proteomics) is a mainstay of biological research and clinical translation, with researchers seeking molecular diagnostics, as well as protein-based markers for personalized medicine. Proteomic strategies using the protease trypsin (known as bottom-up proteomics) were the first to be developed and optimized and form the dominant approach at present. However, researchers are now beginning to understand the limitations of bottom-up techniques, namely the inability to characterize and quantify intact protein molecules from a complex mixture of digested peptides. To overcome these limitations, several laboratories are taking a whole-protein-based approach, in which intact protein molecules are the analytical targets for characterization and quantification. We discuss these top-down techniques and how they have been applied to clinical research and are likely to be applied in the near future. Given the recent improvements in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics and stronger cooperation between researchers, clinicians and statisticians, both peptide-based (bottom-up) strategies and whole-protein-based (top-down) strategies are set to complement each other and help researchers and clinicians better understand and detect complex disease phenotypes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3707033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37070332014-06-27 The emergence of top-down proteomics in clinical research Savaryn, John P Catherman, Adam D Thomas, Paul M Abecassis, Michael M Kelleher, Neil L Genome Med Opinion Proteomic technology has advanced steadily since the development of 'soft-ionization' techniques for mass-spectrometry-based molecular identification more than two decades ago. Now, the large-scale analysis of proteins (proteomics) is a mainstay of biological research and clinical translation, with researchers seeking molecular diagnostics, as well as protein-based markers for personalized medicine. Proteomic strategies using the protease trypsin (known as bottom-up proteomics) were the first to be developed and optimized and form the dominant approach at present. However, researchers are now beginning to understand the limitations of bottom-up techniques, namely the inability to characterize and quantify intact protein molecules from a complex mixture of digested peptides. To overcome these limitations, several laboratories are taking a whole-protein-based approach, in which intact protein molecules are the analytical targets for characterization and quantification. We discuss these top-down techniques and how they have been applied to clinical research and are likely to be applied in the near future. Given the recent improvements in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics and stronger cooperation between researchers, clinicians and statisticians, both peptide-based (bottom-up) strategies and whole-protein-based (top-down) strategies are set to complement each other and help researchers and clinicians better understand and detect complex disease phenotypes. BioMed Central 2013-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3707033/ /pubmed/23806018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gm457 Text en Copyright © 2013 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Opinion
Savaryn, John P
Catherman, Adam D
Thomas, Paul M
Abecassis, Michael M
Kelleher, Neil L
The emergence of top-down proteomics in clinical research
title The emergence of top-down proteomics in clinical research
title_full The emergence of top-down proteomics in clinical research
title_fullStr The emergence of top-down proteomics in clinical research
title_full_unstemmed The emergence of top-down proteomics in clinical research
title_short The emergence of top-down proteomics in clinical research
title_sort emergence of top-down proteomics in clinical research
topic Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3707033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23806018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gm457
work_keys_str_mv AT savarynjohnp theemergenceoftopdownproteomicsinclinicalresearch
AT cathermanadamd theemergenceoftopdownproteomicsinclinicalresearch
AT thomaspaulm theemergenceoftopdownproteomicsinclinicalresearch
AT abecassismichaelm theemergenceoftopdownproteomicsinclinicalresearch
AT kelleherneill theemergenceoftopdownproteomicsinclinicalresearch
AT savarynjohnp emergenceoftopdownproteomicsinclinicalresearch
AT cathermanadamd emergenceoftopdownproteomicsinclinicalresearch
AT thomaspaulm emergenceoftopdownproteomicsinclinicalresearch
AT abecassismichaelm emergenceoftopdownproteomicsinclinicalresearch
AT kelleherneill emergenceoftopdownproteomicsinclinicalresearch