Cargando…
The emergence of top-down proteomics in clinical research
Proteomic technology has advanced steadily since the development of 'soft-ionization' techniques for mass-spectrometry-based molecular identification more than two decades ago. Now, the large-scale analysis of proteins (proteomics) is a mainstay of biological research and clinical translat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3707033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23806018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gm457 |
_version_ | 1782276456857993216 |
---|---|
author | Savaryn, John P Catherman, Adam D Thomas, Paul M Abecassis, Michael M Kelleher, Neil L |
author_facet | Savaryn, John P Catherman, Adam D Thomas, Paul M Abecassis, Michael M Kelleher, Neil L |
author_sort | Savaryn, John P |
collection | PubMed |
description | Proteomic technology has advanced steadily since the development of 'soft-ionization' techniques for mass-spectrometry-based molecular identification more than two decades ago. Now, the large-scale analysis of proteins (proteomics) is a mainstay of biological research and clinical translation, with researchers seeking molecular diagnostics, as well as protein-based markers for personalized medicine. Proteomic strategies using the protease trypsin (known as bottom-up proteomics) were the first to be developed and optimized and form the dominant approach at present. However, researchers are now beginning to understand the limitations of bottom-up techniques, namely the inability to characterize and quantify intact protein molecules from a complex mixture of digested peptides. To overcome these limitations, several laboratories are taking a whole-protein-based approach, in which intact protein molecules are the analytical targets for characterization and quantification. We discuss these top-down techniques and how they have been applied to clinical research and are likely to be applied in the near future. Given the recent improvements in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics and stronger cooperation between researchers, clinicians and statisticians, both peptide-based (bottom-up) strategies and whole-protein-based (top-down) strategies are set to complement each other and help researchers and clinicians better understand and detect complex disease phenotypes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3707033 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37070332014-06-27 The emergence of top-down proteomics in clinical research Savaryn, John P Catherman, Adam D Thomas, Paul M Abecassis, Michael M Kelleher, Neil L Genome Med Opinion Proteomic technology has advanced steadily since the development of 'soft-ionization' techniques for mass-spectrometry-based molecular identification more than two decades ago. Now, the large-scale analysis of proteins (proteomics) is a mainstay of biological research and clinical translation, with researchers seeking molecular diagnostics, as well as protein-based markers for personalized medicine. Proteomic strategies using the protease trypsin (known as bottom-up proteomics) were the first to be developed and optimized and form the dominant approach at present. However, researchers are now beginning to understand the limitations of bottom-up techniques, namely the inability to characterize and quantify intact protein molecules from a complex mixture of digested peptides. To overcome these limitations, several laboratories are taking a whole-protein-based approach, in which intact protein molecules are the analytical targets for characterization and quantification. We discuss these top-down techniques and how they have been applied to clinical research and are likely to be applied in the near future. Given the recent improvements in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics and stronger cooperation between researchers, clinicians and statisticians, both peptide-based (bottom-up) strategies and whole-protein-based (top-down) strategies are set to complement each other and help researchers and clinicians better understand and detect complex disease phenotypes. BioMed Central 2013-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3707033/ /pubmed/23806018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gm457 Text en Copyright © 2013 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Opinion Savaryn, John P Catherman, Adam D Thomas, Paul M Abecassis, Michael M Kelleher, Neil L The emergence of top-down proteomics in clinical research |
title | The emergence of top-down proteomics in clinical research |
title_full | The emergence of top-down proteomics in clinical research |
title_fullStr | The emergence of top-down proteomics in clinical research |
title_full_unstemmed | The emergence of top-down proteomics in clinical research |
title_short | The emergence of top-down proteomics in clinical research |
title_sort | emergence of top-down proteomics in clinical research |
topic | Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3707033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23806018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gm457 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT savarynjohnp theemergenceoftopdownproteomicsinclinicalresearch AT cathermanadamd theemergenceoftopdownproteomicsinclinicalresearch AT thomaspaulm theemergenceoftopdownproteomicsinclinicalresearch AT abecassismichaelm theemergenceoftopdownproteomicsinclinicalresearch AT kelleherneill theemergenceoftopdownproteomicsinclinicalresearch AT savarynjohnp emergenceoftopdownproteomicsinclinicalresearch AT cathermanadamd emergenceoftopdownproteomicsinclinicalresearch AT thomaspaulm emergenceoftopdownproteomicsinclinicalresearch AT abecassismichaelm emergenceoftopdownproteomicsinclinicalresearch AT kelleherneill emergenceoftopdownproteomicsinclinicalresearch |