Cargando…
A biomechanical assessment of superior shoulder translation after reconstruction of anterior glenoid bone defects: The Latarjet procedure versus allograft reconstruction
BACKGROUND: The coracoacromial ligament (CAL) is an important restraint to superior shoulder translation. The effect of CAL release on superior stability following the Latarjet is unknown; therefore, our purpose was to compare the effect of two Latarjet techniques and allograft reconstruction on sup...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3707337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23858289 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.109879 |
_version_ | 1782276498768527360 |
---|---|
author | Degen, Ryan M. Giles, Joshua W. Boons, Harm W. Litchfield, Robert B. Johnson, James A. Athwal, George S. |
author_facet | Degen, Ryan M. Giles, Joshua W. Boons, Harm W. Litchfield, Robert B. Johnson, James A. Athwal, George S. |
author_sort | Degen, Ryan M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The coracoacromial ligament (CAL) is an important restraint to superior shoulder translation. The effect of CAL release on superior stability following the Latarjet is unknown; therefore, our purpose was to compare the effect of two Latarjet techniques and allograft reconstruction on superior instability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight cadaveric specimens were tested on a simulator. Superior translation was monitored following an axial force in various glenohumeral rotations (neutral, internal, and external) with and without muscle loading. Three intact CAL states were tested (intact specimen, 30% glenoid bone defect, and allograft reconstruction) and two CAL deficient states (classic Latarjet (classicLAT) and congruent-arc Latarjet (congruentLAT)). RESULTS: In neutral without muscle loading, a significant increase in superior translation occurred with the classicLAT as compared to 30% defect (P = 0.046) and allograft conditions (P = 0.041). With muscle loading, the classicLAT (P = 0.005, 0.002) and the congruentLAT (P = 0.018, 0.021) had significantly greater superior translation compared to intact and allograft, respectively. In internal rotation, only loaded tests produced significant results; specifically, classicLAT increased translation compared to all intact CAL states (P < 0.05). In external rotation, only unloaded tests produced significant results with classicLAT and congruentLAT allowing greater translations than intact (P ≤ 0.028). For all simulations, the allograft was not significantly different than intact (P > 0.05) and no differences (P = 1.0) were found between classicLAT and congruentLAT. DISCUSSION: In most simulations, CAL release with the Latarjet lead to increased superior humeral translation. CONCLUSION: The choice of technique for glenoid bone loss reconstruction has implications on the magnitude of superior humeral translation. This previously unknown effect requires further study to determine its clinical and kinematic outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3707337 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37073372013-07-15 A biomechanical assessment of superior shoulder translation after reconstruction of anterior glenoid bone defects: The Latarjet procedure versus allograft reconstruction Degen, Ryan M. Giles, Joshua W. Boons, Harm W. Litchfield, Robert B. Johnson, James A. Athwal, George S. Int J Shoulder Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: The coracoacromial ligament (CAL) is an important restraint to superior shoulder translation. The effect of CAL release on superior stability following the Latarjet is unknown; therefore, our purpose was to compare the effect of two Latarjet techniques and allograft reconstruction on superior instability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight cadaveric specimens were tested on a simulator. Superior translation was monitored following an axial force in various glenohumeral rotations (neutral, internal, and external) with and without muscle loading. Three intact CAL states were tested (intact specimen, 30% glenoid bone defect, and allograft reconstruction) and two CAL deficient states (classic Latarjet (classicLAT) and congruent-arc Latarjet (congruentLAT)). RESULTS: In neutral without muscle loading, a significant increase in superior translation occurred with the classicLAT as compared to 30% defect (P = 0.046) and allograft conditions (P = 0.041). With muscle loading, the classicLAT (P = 0.005, 0.002) and the congruentLAT (P = 0.018, 0.021) had significantly greater superior translation compared to intact and allograft, respectively. In internal rotation, only loaded tests produced significant results; specifically, classicLAT increased translation compared to all intact CAL states (P < 0.05). In external rotation, only unloaded tests produced significant results with classicLAT and congruentLAT allowing greater translations than intact (P ≤ 0.028). For all simulations, the allograft was not significantly different than intact (P > 0.05) and no differences (P = 1.0) were found between classicLAT and congruentLAT. DISCUSSION: In most simulations, CAL release with the Latarjet lead to increased superior humeral translation. CONCLUSION: The choice of technique for glenoid bone loss reconstruction has implications on the magnitude of superior humeral translation. This previously unknown effect requires further study to determine its clinical and kinematic outcomes. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3707337/ /pubmed/23858289 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.109879 Text en Copyright: © International Journal of Shoulder Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Degen, Ryan M. Giles, Joshua W. Boons, Harm W. Litchfield, Robert B. Johnson, James A. Athwal, George S. A biomechanical assessment of superior shoulder translation after reconstruction of anterior glenoid bone defects: The Latarjet procedure versus allograft reconstruction |
title | A biomechanical assessment of superior shoulder translation after reconstruction of anterior glenoid bone defects: The Latarjet procedure versus allograft reconstruction |
title_full | A biomechanical assessment of superior shoulder translation after reconstruction of anterior glenoid bone defects: The Latarjet procedure versus allograft reconstruction |
title_fullStr | A biomechanical assessment of superior shoulder translation after reconstruction of anterior glenoid bone defects: The Latarjet procedure versus allograft reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | A biomechanical assessment of superior shoulder translation after reconstruction of anterior glenoid bone defects: The Latarjet procedure versus allograft reconstruction |
title_short | A biomechanical assessment of superior shoulder translation after reconstruction of anterior glenoid bone defects: The Latarjet procedure versus allograft reconstruction |
title_sort | biomechanical assessment of superior shoulder translation after reconstruction of anterior glenoid bone defects: the latarjet procedure versus allograft reconstruction |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3707337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23858289 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.109879 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT degenryanm abiomechanicalassessmentofsuperiorshouldertranslationafterreconstructionofanteriorglenoidbonedefectsthelatarjetprocedureversusallograftreconstruction AT gilesjoshuaw abiomechanicalassessmentofsuperiorshouldertranslationafterreconstructionofanteriorglenoidbonedefectsthelatarjetprocedureversusallograftreconstruction AT boonsharmw abiomechanicalassessmentofsuperiorshouldertranslationafterreconstructionofanteriorglenoidbonedefectsthelatarjetprocedureversusallograftreconstruction AT litchfieldrobertb abiomechanicalassessmentofsuperiorshouldertranslationafterreconstructionofanteriorglenoidbonedefectsthelatarjetprocedureversusallograftreconstruction AT johnsonjamesa abiomechanicalassessmentofsuperiorshouldertranslationafterreconstructionofanteriorglenoidbonedefectsthelatarjetprocedureversusallograftreconstruction AT athwalgeorges abiomechanicalassessmentofsuperiorshouldertranslationafterreconstructionofanteriorglenoidbonedefectsthelatarjetprocedureversusallograftreconstruction AT degenryanm biomechanicalassessmentofsuperiorshouldertranslationafterreconstructionofanteriorglenoidbonedefectsthelatarjetprocedureversusallograftreconstruction AT gilesjoshuaw biomechanicalassessmentofsuperiorshouldertranslationafterreconstructionofanteriorglenoidbonedefectsthelatarjetprocedureversusallograftreconstruction AT boonsharmw biomechanicalassessmentofsuperiorshouldertranslationafterreconstructionofanteriorglenoidbonedefectsthelatarjetprocedureversusallograftreconstruction AT litchfieldrobertb biomechanicalassessmentofsuperiorshouldertranslationafterreconstructionofanteriorglenoidbonedefectsthelatarjetprocedureversusallograftreconstruction AT johnsonjamesa biomechanicalassessmentofsuperiorshouldertranslationafterreconstructionofanteriorglenoidbonedefectsthelatarjetprocedureversusallograftreconstruction AT athwalgeorges biomechanicalassessmentofsuperiorshouldertranslationafterreconstructionofanteriorglenoidbonedefectsthelatarjetprocedureversusallograftreconstruction |