Cargando…
Is network meta-analysis as valid as standard pairwise meta-analysis? It all depends on the distribution of effect modifiers
BACKGROUND: In the last decade, network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials has been introduced as an extension of pairwise meta-analysis. The advantage of network meta-analysis over standard pairwise meta-analysis is that it facilitates indirect comparisons of multiple interventions that...
Autores principales: | Jansen, Jeroen P, Naci, Huseyin |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3707819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23826681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-159 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Network meta-analysis: users’ guide for pediatricians
por: Al Khalifah, Reem, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Meta-analysis, Simpson's paradox, and the number needed to treat
por: Altman, Douglas G, et al.
Publicado: (2002) -
Effectiveness of interventions for dementia in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review, pairwise and network meta-analysis
por: Salcher-Konrad, Maximilian, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Simpson's paradox and calculation of number needed to treat from meta-analysis
por: Cates, Christopher J
Publicado: (2002) -
Living network meta-analysis compared with pairwise meta-analysis in comparative effectiveness research: empirical study
por: Nikolakopoulou, Adriani, et al.
Publicado: (2018)