Cargando…

Antiviral Responses by Swine Primary Bronchoepithelial Cells Are Limited Compared to Human Bronchoepithelial Cells Following Influenza Virus Infection

Swine generate reassortant influenza viruses because they can be simultaneously infected with avian and human influenza; however, the features that restrict influenza reassortment in swine and human hosts are not fully understood. Type I and III interferons (IFNs) act as the first line of defense ag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hauser, Mary J., Dlugolenski, Daniel, Culhane, Marie R., Wentworth, David E., Tompkins, S. Mark, Tripp, Ralph A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3707852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23875024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070251
_version_ 1782276547378413568
author Hauser, Mary J.
Dlugolenski, Daniel
Culhane, Marie R.
Wentworth, David E.
Tompkins, S. Mark
Tripp, Ralph A.
author_facet Hauser, Mary J.
Dlugolenski, Daniel
Culhane, Marie R.
Wentworth, David E.
Tompkins, S. Mark
Tripp, Ralph A.
author_sort Hauser, Mary J.
collection PubMed
description Swine generate reassortant influenza viruses because they can be simultaneously infected with avian and human influenza; however, the features that restrict influenza reassortment in swine and human hosts are not fully understood. Type I and III interferons (IFNs) act as the first line of defense against influenza virus infection of respiratory epithelium. To determine if human and swine have different capacities to mount an antiviral response the expression of IFN and IFN-stimulated genes (ISG) in normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells and normal swine bronchial epithelial (NSBE) cells was evaluated following infection with human (H3N2), swine (H1N1), and avian (H5N3, H5N2, H5N1) influenza A viruses. Expression of IFNλ and ISGs were substantially higher in NHBE cells compared to NSBE cells following H5 avian influenza virus infection compared to human or swine influenza virus infection. This effect was associated with reduced H5 avian influenza virus replication in human cells at late times post infection. Further, RIG-I expression was lower in NSBE cells compared to NHBE cells suggesting reduced virus sensing. Together, these studies identify key differences in the antiviral response between human and swine respiratory epithelium alluding to differences that may govern influenza reassortment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3707852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37078522013-07-19 Antiviral Responses by Swine Primary Bronchoepithelial Cells Are Limited Compared to Human Bronchoepithelial Cells Following Influenza Virus Infection Hauser, Mary J. Dlugolenski, Daniel Culhane, Marie R. Wentworth, David E. Tompkins, S. Mark Tripp, Ralph A. PLoS One Research Article Swine generate reassortant influenza viruses because they can be simultaneously infected with avian and human influenza; however, the features that restrict influenza reassortment in swine and human hosts are not fully understood. Type I and III interferons (IFNs) act as the first line of defense against influenza virus infection of respiratory epithelium. To determine if human and swine have different capacities to mount an antiviral response the expression of IFN and IFN-stimulated genes (ISG) in normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells and normal swine bronchial epithelial (NSBE) cells was evaluated following infection with human (H3N2), swine (H1N1), and avian (H5N3, H5N2, H5N1) influenza A viruses. Expression of IFNλ and ISGs were substantially higher in NHBE cells compared to NSBE cells following H5 avian influenza virus infection compared to human or swine influenza virus infection. This effect was associated with reduced H5 avian influenza virus replication in human cells at late times post infection. Further, RIG-I expression was lower in NSBE cells compared to NHBE cells suggesting reduced virus sensing. Together, these studies identify key differences in the antiviral response between human and swine respiratory epithelium alluding to differences that may govern influenza reassortment. Public Library of Science 2013-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3707852/ /pubmed/23875024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070251 Text en © 2013 Hauser et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hauser, Mary J.
Dlugolenski, Daniel
Culhane, Marie R.
Wentworth, David E.
Tompkins, S. Mark
Tripp, Ralph A.
Antiviral Responses by Swine Primary Bronchoepithelial Cells Are Limited Compared to Human Bronchoepithelial Cells Following Influenza Virus Infection
title Antiviral Responses by Swine Primary Bronchoepithelial Cells Are Limited Compared to Human Bronchoepithelial Cells Following Influenza Virus Infection
title_full Antiviral Responses by Swine Primary Bronchoepithelial Cells Are Limited Compared to Human Bronchoepithelial Cells Following Influenza Virus Infection
title_fullStr Antiviral Responses by Swine Primary Bronchoepithelial Cells Are Limited Compared to Human Bronchoepithelial Cells Following Influenza Virus Infection
title_full_unstemmed Antiviral Responses by Swine Primary Bronchoepithelial Cells Are Limited Compared to Human Bronchoepithelial Cells Following Influenza Virus Infection
title_short Antiviral Responses by Swine Primary Bronchoepithelial Cells Are Limited Compared to Human Bronchoepithelial Cells Following Influenza Virus Infection
title_sort antiviral responses by swine primary bronchoepithelial cells are limited compared to human bronchoepithelial cells following influenza virus infection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3707852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23875024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070251
work_keys_str_mv AT hausermaryj antiviralresponsesbyswineprimarybronchoepithelialcellsarelimitedcomparedtohumanbronchoepithelialcellsfollowinginfluenzavirusinfection
AT dlugolenskidaniel antiviralresponsesbyswineprimarybronchoepithelialcellsarelimitedcomparedtohumanbronchoepithelialcellsfollowinginfluenzavirusinfection
AT culhanemarier antiviralresponsesbyswineprimarybronchoepithelialcellsarelimitedcomparedtohumanbronchoepithelialcellsfollowinginfluenzavirusinfection
AT wentworthdavide antiviralresponsesbyswineprimarybronchoepithelialcellsarelimitedcomparedtohumanbronchoepithelialcellsfollowinginfluenzavirusinfection
AT tompkinssmark antiviralresponsesbyswineprimarybronchoepithelialcellsarelimitedcomparedtohumanbronchoepithelialcellsfollowinginfluenzavirusinfection
AT trippralpha antiviralresponsesbyswineprimarybronchoepithelialcellsarelimitedcomparedtohumanbronchoepithelialcellsfollowinginfluenzavirusinfection