Cargando…

What do the recent American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Practice Guidelines tell us about the evolving management of coronary heart disease in older adults?

Biological aging predisposes older adults to increased cardiovascular disease (CHD) and greater disease complexity. Given the high age-related prevalence of CHD and age-related compounding factors, the recently updated American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation CHD-related...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forman, Daniel, Wenger, Nanette K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Science Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3708050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23888170
http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-5411.2013.02.012
_version_ 1782276569478201344
author Forman, Daniel
Wenger, Nanette K
author_facet Forman, Daniel
Wenger, Nanette K
author_sort Forman, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Biological aging predisposes older adults to increased cardiovascular disease (CHD) and greater disease complexity. Given the high age-related prevalence of CHD and age-related compounding factors, the recently updated American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation CHD-related guidelines increased their focus on older patients. These guidelines are predominately evidence-based (using data from quality randomized clinical trials) and are organized to delineate medications and procedures that best treat particular cardiovascular diseases. While such rationale and thought work well in young and middle aged adults, they become problematic in patients who are very old. Data pertaining to adults aged ≥ 80 are virtually absent from most randomized clinical trials, and even in the instances when very old patients were included, eligibility criteria typically excluded candidates with co-morbidities and complexities of customary CHD patients. While medications and interventions yielding benefit in clinical trials should theoretically produce the greatest benefits for patients with high intrinsic risk, age-related cardiovascular complexities also increase iatrogenic risks. Navigating between the potential for high benefit and high risk in “evidence-based” cardiovascular management remains a key Geriatric Cardiology challenge. In this review we consider the expanded Geriatric Cardiology content of current guidelines, acknowledging both the progress that has been made, as well as the work that still needs to be accomplished to truly address the patient-centered priorities of older CHD patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3708050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Science Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37080502013-07-25 What do the recent American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Practice Guidelines tell us about the evolving management of coronary heart disease in older adults? Forman, Daniel Wenger, Nanette K J Geriatr Cardiol State-of-the-Art Article Biological aging predisposes older adults to increased cardiovascular disease (CHD) and greater disease complexity. Given the high age-related prevalence of CHD and age-related compounding factors, the recently updated American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation CHD-related guidelines increased their focus on older patients. These guidelines are predominately evidence-based (using data from quality randomized clinical trials) and are organized to delineate medications and procedures that best treat particular cardiovascular diseases. While such rationale and thought work well in young and middle aged adults, they become problematic in patients who are very old. Data pertaining to adults aged ≥ 80 are virtually absent from most randomized clinical trials, and even in the instances when very old patients were included, eligibility criteria typically excluded candidates with co-morbidities and complexities of customary CHD patients. While medications and interventions yielding benefit in clinical trials should theoretically produce the greatest benefits for patients with high intrinsic risk, age-related cardiovascular complexities also increase iatrogenic risks. Navigating between the potential for high benefit and high risk in “evidence-based” cardiovascular management remains a key Geriatric Cardiology challenge. In this review we consider the expanded Geriatric Cardiology content of current guidelines, acknowledging both the progress that has been made, as well as the work that still needs to be accomplished to truly address the patient-centered priorities of older CHD patients. Science Press 2013-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3708050/ /pubmed/23888170 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-5411.2013.02.012 Text en Institute of Geriatric Cardiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which allows readers to alter, transform, or build upon the article and then distribute the resulting work under the same or similar license to this one. The work must be attributed back to the original author and commercial use is not permitted without specific permission.
spellingShingle State-of-the-Art Article
Forman, Daniel
Wenger, Nanette K
What do the recent American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Practice Guidelines tell us about the evolving management of coronary heart disease in older adults?
title What do the recent American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Practice Guidelines tell us about the evolving management of coronary heart disease in older adults?
title_full What do the recent American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Practice Guidelines tell us about the evolving management of coronary heart disease in older adults?
title_fullStr What do the recent American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Practice Guidelines tell us about the evolving management of coronary heart disease in older adults?
title_full_unstemmed What do the recent American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Practice Guidelines tell us about the evolving management of coronary heart disease in older adults?
title_short What do the recent American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Practice Guidelines tell us about the evolving management of coronary heart disease in older adults?
title_sort what do the recent american heart association/american college of cardiology foundation clinical practice guidelines tell us about the evolving management of coronary heart disease in older adults?
topic State-of-the-Art Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3708050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23888170
http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-5411.2013.02.012
work_keys_str_mv AT formandaniel whatdotherecentamericanheartassociationamericancollegeofcardiologyfoundationclinicalpracticeguidelinestellusabouttheevolvingmanagementofcoronaryheartdiseaseinolderadults
AT wengernanettek whatdotherecentamericanheartassociationamericancollegeofcardiologyfoundationclinicalpracticeguidelinestellusabouttheevolvingmanagementofcoronaryheartdiseaseinolderadults