Cargando…
What do the recent American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Practice Guidelines tell us about the evolving management of coronary heart disease in older adults?
Biological aging predisposes older adults to increased cardiovascular disease (CHD) and greater disease complexity. Given the high age-related prevalence of CHD and age-related compounding factors, the recently updated American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation CHD-related...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Science Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3708050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23888170 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-5411.2013.02.012 |
_version_ | 1782276569478201344 |
---|---|
author | Forman, Daniel Wenger, Nanette K |
author_facet | Forman, Daniel Wenger, Nanette K |
author_sort | Forman, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biological aging predisposes older adults to increased cardiovascular disease (CHD) and greater disease complexity. Given the high age-related prevalence of CHD and age-related compounding factors, the recently updated American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation CHD-related guidelines increased their focus on older patients. These guidelines are predominately evidence-based (using data from quality randomized clinical trials) and are organized to delineate medications and procedures that best treat particular cardiovascular diseases. While such rationale and thought work well in young and middle aged adults, they become problematic in patients who are very old. Data pertaining to adults aged ≥ 80 are virtually absent from most randomized clinical trials, and even in the instances when very old patients were included, eligibility criteria typically excluded candidates with co-morbidities and complexities of customary CHD patients. While medications and interventions yielding benefit in clinical trials should theoretically produce the greatest benefits for patients with high intrinsic risk, age-related cardiovascular complexities also increase iatrogenic risks. Navigating between the potential for high benefit and high risk in “evidence-based” cardiovascular management remains a key Geriatric Cardiology challenge. In this review we consider the expanded Geriatric Cardiology content of current guidelines, acknowledging both the progress that has been made, as well as the work that still needs to be accomplished to truly address the patient-centered priorities of older CHD patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3708050 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Science Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37080502013-07-25 What do the recent American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Practice Guidelines tell us about the evolving management of coronary heart disease in older adults? Forman, Daniel Wenger, Nanette K J Geriatr Cardiol State-of-the-Art Article Biological aging predisposes older adults to increased cardiovascular disease (CHD) and greater disease complexity. Given the high age-related prevalence of CHD and age-related compounding factors, the recently updated American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation CHD-related guidelines increased their focus on older patients. These guidelines are predominately evidence-based (using data from quality randomized clinical trials) and are organized to delineate medications and procedures that best treat particular cardiovascular diseases. While such rationale and thought work well in young and middle aged adults, they become problematic in patients who are very old. Data pertaining to adults aged ≥ 80 are virtually absent from most randomized clinical trials, and even in the instances when very old patients were included, eligibility criteria typically excluded candidates with co-morbidities and complexities of customary CHD patients. While medications and interventions yielding benefit in clinical trials should theoretically produce the greatest benefits for patients with high intrinsic risk, age-related cardiovascular complexities also increase iatrogenic risks. Navigating between the potential for high benefit and high risk in “evidence-based” cardiovascular management remains a key Geriatric Cardiology challenge. In this review we consider the expanded Geriatric Cardiology content of current guidelines, acknowledging both the progress that has been made, as well as the work that still needs to be accomplished to truly address the patient-centered priorities of older CHD patients. Science Press 2013-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3708050/ /pubmed/23888170 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-5411.2013.02.012 Text en Institute of Geriatric Cardiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which allows readers to alter, transform, or build upon the article and then distribute the resulting work under the same or similar license to this one. The work must be attributed back to the original author and commercial use is not permitted without specific permission. |
spellingShingle | State-of-the-Art Article Forman, Daniel Wenger, Nanette K What do the recent American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Practice Guidelines tell us about the evolving management of coronary heart disease in older adults? |
title | What do the recent American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Practice Guidelines tell us about the evolving management of coronary heart disease in older adults? |
title_full | What do the recent American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Practice Guidelines tell us about the evolving management of coronary heart disease in older adults? |
title_fullStr | What do the recent American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Practice Guidelines tell us about the evolving management of coronary heart disease in older adults? |
title_full_unstemmed | What do the recent American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Practice Guidelines tell us about the evolving management of coronary heart disease in older adults? |
title_short | What do the recent American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Practice Guidelines tell us about the evolving management of coronary heart disease in older adults? |
title_sort | what do the recent american heart association/american college of cardiology foundation clinical practice guidelines tell us about the evolving management of coronary heart disease in older adults? |
topic | State-of-the-Art Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3708050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23888170 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-5411.2013.02.012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT formandaniel whatdotherecentamericanheartassociationamericancollegeofcardiologyfoundationclinicalpracticeguidelinestellusabouttheevolvingmanagementofcoronaryheartdiseaseinolderadults AT wengernanettek whatdotherecentamericanheartassociationamericancollegeofcardiologyfoundationclinicalpracticeguidelinestellusabouttheevolvingmanagementofcoronaryheartdiseaseinolderadults |