Cargando…
High resolution (3 Tesla) MRI-guided conformal brachytherapy for cervical cancer: consequences of different high-risk CTV sizes
PURPOSE: To evaluate conventional brachytherapy (BT) plans using dose-volume parameters and high resolution (3 Tesla) MRI datasets, and to quantify dosimetric benefits and limitations when MRI-guided, conformal BT (MRIG-CBT) plans are generated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-five clinical high-dose-ra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3708151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23878555 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2013.36180 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: To evaluate conventional brachytherapy (BT) plans using dose-volume parameters and high resolution (3 Tesla) MRI datasets, and to quantify dosimetric benefits and limitations when MRI-guided, conformal BT (MRIG-CBT) plans are generated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-five clinical high-dose-rate BT plans from 14 cervical cancer patients were retrospectively studied. All conventional plans were created using MRI with titanium tandem-and-ovoid applicator (T&O) for delivery. For each conventional plan, a MRIG-CBT plan was retrospectively generated using hybrid inverse optimization. Three categories of high risk (HR)-CTV were considered based on volume: non-bulky (< 2(0 cc)), low-bulky (> 20 cc and < 40 cc) and bulky (≥ 40 cc). Dose-volume metrics of D(90) of HR-CTV and D(2cc) and D(0.1cc) of rectum, bladder, and sigmoid colon were analyzed. RESULTS: Tumor coverage (HR-CTV D(90)) of the conventional plans was considerably affected by the HR-CTV size. Sixteen percent of the plans covered HR-CTV D(90) with the prescription dose within 5%. At least one OAR had D(2cc) values over the GEC-ESTRO recommended limits in 52.7% of the conventional plans. MRIG-CBT plans showed improved target coverage for HR-CTV D(90) of 98 and 97% of the prescribed dose for non-bulky and low-bulky tumors, respectively. No MRIG-CBT plans surpassed the D(2cc) limits of any OAR. Only small improvements (D(90) of 80%) were found for large targets (> 40 cc) when using T&O applicator approach. CONCLUSIONS: MRIG-CBT plans displayed considerable improvement for tumor coverage and OAR sparing over conventional treatment. When the HR-CTV volume exceeded 40 cc, its improvements were diminished when using a conventional intracavitary applicator. |
---|