Cargando…

Difference in Risk Factors for Breast Cancer by ER Status in an Indigenous African Population

Introduction. Breast cancer is the commonest cancer among women globally. In Uganda, it is on the rise, projected at a 4.5% annual ASR increase (age standardized incidence rate). The reasons for this steep increase are not fully established. In the recent past, gene profiling in tumor tissues sugges...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Galukande, M., Wabinga, H., Mirembe, F., Karamagi, C., Asea, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3708443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23936673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/463594
_version_ 1782276621560971264
author Galukande, M.
Wabinga, H.
Mirembe, F.
Karamagi, C.
Asea, A.
author_facet Galukande, M.
Wabinga, H.
Mirembe, F.
Karamagi, C.
Asea, A.
author_sort Galukande, M.
collection PubMed
description Introduction. Breast cancer is the commonest cancer among women globally. In Uganda, it is on the rise, projected at a 4.5% annual ASR increase (age standardized incidence rate). The reasons for this steep increase are not fully established. In the recent past, gene profiling in tumor tissues suggests that breast cancers are divided into subtypes dependent on the presence or absence of oestrogen receptor, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER 2). These subtypes do have distinctive clinical outcomes and perhaps risk factors from past studies. There is paucity of data on hormonal receptor status and the traditionally known risk factors in sub-Saharan Africa. The purpose of this study therefore was to establish the differences between ER status and the traditionally known risk factors for breast cancer in Uganda. Methods. An observational analytical hospital, based study, carried out at Makerere University, College of Health Sciences. Formalin fixed and paraffin imbedded sections were prepared for haemotoxylin and eosin (H&E) stains and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Ethical approval was obtained. Results. A total of 113 women were recruited. Mean age was 45 years (SD14). There were no significant differences in selected risk factors (setting, age, contraceptive use, parity, breast feeding, or menarche) by ER status although ER negative tumors had significantly higher grade tumors (by a factor of two) compared to ER positive tumors. Conclusion. There were no significant differences among risk factors by ER status contrary to what several other studies suggest. The manifestation of breast cancer in Africa warrants further extensive inquiry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3708443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37084432013-08-09 Difference in Risk Factors for Breast Cancer by ER Status in an Indigenous African Population Galukande, M. Wabinga, H. Mirembe, F. Karamagi, C. Asea, A. ISRN Oncol Research Article Introduction. Breast cancer is the commonest cancer among women globally. In Uganda, it is on the rise, projected at a 4.5% annual ASR increase (age standardized incidence rate). The reasons for this steep increase are not fully established. In the recent past, gene profiling in tumor tissues suggests that breast cancers are divided into subtypes dependent on the presence or absence of oestrogen receptor, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER 2). These subtypes do have distinctive clinical outcomes and perhaps risk factors from past studies. There is paucity of data on hormonal receptor status and the traditionally known risk factors in sub-Saharan Africa. The purpose of this study therefore was to establish the differences between ER status and the traditionally known risk factors for breast cancer in Uganda. Methods. An observational analytical hospital, based study, carried out at Makerere University, College of Health Sciences. Formalin fixed and paraffin imbedded sections were prepared for haemotoxylin and eosin (H&E) stains and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Ethical approval was obtained. Results. A total of 113 women were recruited. Mean age was 45 years (SD14). There were no significant differences in selected risk factors (setting, age, contraceptive use, parity, breast feeding, or menarche) by ER status although ER negative tumors had significantly higher grade tumors (by a factor of two) compared to ER positive tumors. Conclusion. There were no significant differences among risk factors by ER status contrary to what several other studies suggest. The manifestation of breast cancer in Africa warrants further extensive inquiry. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3708443/ /pubmed/23936673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/463594 Text en Copyright © 2013 M. Galukande et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Galukande, M.
Wabinga, H.
Mirembe, F.
Karamagi, C.
Asea, A.
Difference in Risk Factors for Breast Cancer by ER Status in an Indigenous African Population
title Difference in Risk Factors for Breast Cancer by ER Status in an Indigenous African Population
title_full Difference in Risk Factors for Breast Cancer by ER Status in an Indigenous African Population
title_fullStr Difference in Risk Factors for Breast Cancer by ER Status in an Indigenous African Population
title_full_unstemmed Difference in Risk Factors for Breast Cancer by ER Status in an Indigenous African Population
title_short Difference in Risk Factors for Breast Cancer by ER Status in an Indigenous African Population
title_sort difference in risk factors for breast cancer by er status in an indigenous african population
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3708443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23936673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/463594
work_keys_str_mv AT galukandem differenceinriskfactorsforbreastcancerbyerstatusinanindigenousafricanpopulation
AT wabingah differenceinriskfactorsforbreastcancerbyerstatusinanindigenousafricanpopulation
AT mirembef differenceinriskfactorsforbreastcancerbyerstatusinanindigenousafricanpopulation
AT karamagic differenceinriskfactorsforbreastcancerbyerstatusinanindigenousafricanpopulation
AT aseaa differenceinriskfactorsforbreastcancerbyerstatusinanindigenousafricanpopulation