Cargando…
Difference in Risk Factors for Breast Cancer by ER Status in an Indigenous African Population
Introduction. Breast cancer is the commonest cancer among women globally. In Uganda, it is on the rise, projected at a 4.5% annual ASR increase (age standardized incidence rate). The reasons for this steep increase are not fully established. In the recent past, gene profiling in tumor tissues sugges...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3708443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23936673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/463594 |
_version_ | 1782276621560971264 |
---|---|
author | Galukande, M. Wabinga, H. Mirembe, F. Karamagi, C. Asea, A. |
author_facet | Galukande, M. Wabinga, H. Mirembe, F. Karamagi, C. Asea, A. |
author_sort | Galukande, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction. Breast cancer is the commonest cancer among women globally. In Uganda, it is on the rise, projected at a 4.5% annual ASR increase (age standardized incidence rate). The reasons for this steep increase are not fully established. In the recent past, gene profiling in tumor tissues suggests that breast cancers are divided into subtypes dependent on the presence or absence of oestrogen receptor, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER 2). These subtypes do have distinctive clinical outcomes and perhaps risk factors from past studies. There is paucity of data on hormonal receptor status and the traditionally known risk factors in sub-Saharan Africa. The purpose of this study therefore was to establish the differences between ER status and the traditionally known risk factors for breast cancer in Uganda. Methods. An observational analytical hospital, based study, carried out at Makerere University, College of Health Sciences. Formalin fixed and paraffin imbedded sections were prepared for haemotoxylin and eosin (H&E) stains and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Ethical approval was obtained. Results. A total of 113 women were recruited. Mean age was 45 years (SD14). There were no significant differences in selected risk factors (setting, age, contraceptive use, parity, breast feeding, or menarche) by ER status although ER negative tumors had significantly higher grade tumors (by a factor of two) compared to ER positive tumors. Conclusion. There were no significant differences among risk factors by ER status contrary to what several other studies suggest. The manifestation of breast cancer in Africa warrants further extensive inquiry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3708443 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37084432013-08-09 Difference in Risk Factors for Breast Cancer by ER Status in an Indigenous African Population Galukande, M. Wabinga, H. Mirembe, F. Karamagi, C. Asea, A. ISRN Oncol Research Article Introduction. Breast cancer is the commonest cancer among women globally. In Uganda, it is on the rise, projected at a 4.5% annual ASR increase (age standardized incidence rate). The reasons for this steep increase are not fully established. In the recent past, gene profiling in tumor tissues suggests that breast cancers are divided into subtypes dependent on the presence or absence of oestrogen receptor, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER 2). These subtypes do have distinctive clinical outcomes and perhaps risk factors from past studies. There is paucity of data on hormonal receptor status and the traditionally known risk factors in sub-Saharan Africa. The purpose of this study therefore was to establish the differences between ER status and the traditionally known risk factors for breast cancer in Uganda. Methods. An observational analytical hospital, based study, carried out at Makerere University, College of Health Sciences. Formalin fixed and paraffin imbedded sections were prepared for haemotoxylin and eosin (H&E) stains and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Ethical approval was obtained. Results. A total of 113 women were recruited. Mean age was 45 years (SD14). There were no significant differences in selected risk factors (setting, age, contraceptive use, parity, breast feeding, or menarche) by ER status although ER negative tumors had significantly higher grade tumors (by a factor of two) compared to ER positive tumors. Conclusion. There were no significant differences among risk factors by ER status contrary to what several other studies suggest. The manifestation of breast cancer in Africa warrants further extensive inquiry. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3708443/ /pubmed/23936673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/463594 Text en Copyright © 2013 M. Galukande et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Galukande, M. Wabinga, H. Mirembe, F. Karamagi, C. Asea, A. Difference in Risk Factors for Breast Cancer by ER Status in an Indigenous African Population |
title | Difference in Risk Factors for Breast Cancer by ER Status in an Indigenous African Population |
title_full | Difference in Risk Factors for Breast Cancer by ER Status in an Indigenous African Population |
title_fullStr | Difference in Risk Factors for Breast Cancer by ER Status in an Indigenous African Population |
title_full_unstemmed | Difference in Risk Factors for Breast Cancer by ER Status in an Indigenous African Population |
title_short | Difference in Risk Factors for Breast Cancer by ER Status in an Indigenous African Population |
title_sort | difference in risk factors for breast cancer by er status in an indigenous african population |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3708443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23936673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/463594 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT galukandem differenceinriskfactorsforbreastcancerbyerstatusinanindigenousafricanpopulation AT wabingah differenceinriskfactorsforbreastcancerbyerstatusinanindigenousafricanpopulation AT mirembef differenceinriskfactorsforbreastcancerbyerstatusinanindigenousafricanpopulation AT karamagic differenceinriskfactorsforbreastcancerbyerstatusinanindigenousafricanpopulation AT aseaa differenceinriskfactorsforbreastcancerbyerstatusinanindigenousafricanpopulation |