Cargando…

Transcription Start Site Evolution in Drosophila

Transcription start site (TSS) evolution remains largely undescribed in Drosophila, likely due to limited annotations in non-melanogaster species. In this study, we introduce a concise new method that selectively sequences from the 5′-end of mRNA and used it to identify TSS in four Drosophila specie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Main, Bradley J., Smith, Andrew D., Jang, Hyosik, Nuzhdin, Sergey V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3708499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23649539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst085
_version_ 1782276623147466752
author Main, Bradley J.
Smith, Andrew D.
Jang, Hyosik
Nuzhdin, Sergey V.
author_facet Main, Bradley J.
Smith, Andrew D.
Jang, Hyosik
Nuzhdin, Sergey V.
author_sort Main, Bradley J.
collection PubMed
description Transcription start site (TSS) evolution remains largely undescribed in Drosophila, likely due to limited annotations in non-melanogaster species. In this study, we introduce a concise new method that selectively sequences from the 5′-end of mRNA and used it to identify TSS in four Drosophila species, including Drosophila melanogaster, D. simulans, D. sechellia, and D. pseudoobscura. For verification, we compared our results in D. melanogaster with known annotations, published 5′-rapid amplification of cDNA ends data, and with RNAseq from the same mRNA pool. Then, we paired 2,849 D. melanogaster TSS with its closest equivalent TSS in each species (likely to be its true ortholog) using the available multiple sequence alignments. Most of the D. melanogaster TSSs were successfully paired with an ortholog in each species (83%, 86%, and 55% for D. simulans, D. sechellia, and D. pseudoobscura, respectively). On the basis of the number and distribution of reads mapped at each TSS, we also estimated promoter-specific expression (PSE) and TSS peak shape, respectively. Among paired TSS orthologs, the location and promoter activity were largely conserved. TSS location appears important as PSE, and TSS peak shape was more frequently divergent among TSS that had moved. Unpaired TSS were surprisingly common in D. pseudoobscura. An increased mutation rate upstream of TSS might explain this pattern. We found an enrichment of ribosomal protein genes among diverged TSS, suggesting that TSS evolution is not uniform across the genome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3708499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37084992013-07-11 Transcription Start Site Evolution in Drosophila Main, Bradley J. Smith, Andrew D. Jang, Hyosik Nuzhdin, Sergey V. Mol Biol Evol Methods Transcription start site (TSS) evolution remains largely undescribed in Drosophila, likely due to limited annotations in non-melanogaster species. In this study, we introduce a concise new method that selectively sequences from the 5′-end of mRNA and used it to identify TSS in four Drosophila species, including Drosophila melanogaster, D. simulans, D. sechellia, and D. pseudoobscura. For verification, we compared our results in D. melanogaster with known annotations, published 5′-rapid amplification of cDNA ends data, and with RNAseq from the same mRNA pool. Then, we paired 2,849 D. melanogaster TSS with its closest equivalent TSS in each species (likely to be its true ortholog) using the available multiple sequence alignments. Most of the D. melanogaster TSSs were successfully paired with an ortholog in each species (83%, 86%, and 55% for D. simulans, D. sechellia, and D. pseudoobscura, respectively). On the basis of the number and distribution of reads mapped at each TSS, we also estimated promoter-specific expression (PSE) and TSS peak shape, respectively. Among paired TSS orthologs, the location and promoter activity were largely conserved. TSS location appears important as PSE, and TSS peak shape was more frequently divergent among TSS that had moved. Unpaired TSS were surprisingly common in D. pseudoobscura. An increased mutation rate upstream of TSS might explain this pattern. We found an enrichment of ribosomal protein genes among diverged TSS, suggesting that TSS evolution is not uniform across the genome. Oxford University Press 2013-08 2013-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3708499/ /pubmed/23649539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst085 Text en © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Methods
Main, Bradley J.
Smith, Andrew D.
Jang, Hyosik
Nuzhdin, Sergey V.
Transcription Start Site Evolution in Drosophila
title Transcription Start Site Evolution in Drosophila
title_full Transcription Start Site Evolution in Drosophila
title_fullStr Transcription Start Site Evolution in Drosophila
title_full_unstemmed Transcription Start Site Evolution in Drosophila
title_short Transcription Start Site Evolution in Drosophila
title_sort transcription start site evolution in drosophila
topic Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3708499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23649539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst085
work_keys_str_mv AT mainbradleyj transcriptionstartsiteevolutionindrosophila
AT smithandrewd transcriptionstartsiteevolutionindrosophila
AT janghyosik transcriptionstartsiteevolutionindrosophila
AT nuzhdinsergeyv transcriptionstartsiteevolutionindrosophila