Cargando…

Association between ERCC1 and XPA expression and polymorphisms and the response to cisplatin in testicular germ cell tumours

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin cures over 80% of testicular germ cell tumours (TGCTs), and nucleotide-excision repair (NER) modifies the sensitivity to cisplatin. We explored the association between NER proteins and their polymorphisms with cisplatin sensitivity (CPS) and overall survival (OS) of patients wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mendoza, J, Martínez, J, Hernández, C, Pérez-Montiel, D, Castro, C, Fabián-Morales, E, Santibáñez, M, González-Barrios, R, Díaz-Chávez, J, Andonegui, M A, Reynoso, N, Oñate, L F, Jiménez, M A, Núñez, M, Dyer, R, Herrera, L A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3708571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23807173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.303
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Cisplatin cures over 80% of testicular germ cell tumours (TGCTs), and nucleotide-excision repair (NER) modifies the sensitivity to cisplatin. We explored the association between NER proteins and their polymorphisms with cisplatin sensitivity (CPS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with non-seminomatous (ns)-TGCTs. METHODS: The expression of ERCC1 and XPA and the presence of γH2AX were evaluated in cancer cell lines and in fresh ns-TGCTs. The ERCC1 protein was also determined in ns-TGCTs. The differences between CPS and non-CPS cell lines and patients were analysed by Student's t- or χ(2)-tests. The differences in OS were analysed using the log-rank test, and the hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using the Cox model. RESULTS: High ERCC1 expression was observed in the non-CPS cells, and both ERCC1 and γH2AX expressions were augmented after cisplatin treatment. Increased ERCC1 expression was also identified in non-CPS patients. Neither polymorphism was associated with either CPS or OS. The presence of ERCC1 was associated with non-CPS (P=0.05) and adjusted in the prognosis groups. The HR in ERCC1-negative and non-CPS patients was >14.43, and in ERCC1-positive and non-CPS patients the HR was >11.86 (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: High levels of ERCC1 were associated with non-CPS, suggesting that ERCC1 could be used as a potential indicator of the response to cisplatin and prognosis in ns-TGCTs.