Cargando…

Platinum-Based Versus Non-Platinum-Based Chemotherapy as First Line Treatment of Inoperable, Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Although the platinum regimen is adopted widely nowadays in spite of the excessive side effects, there is still no international standard for palliative chemotherapy of advanced gastric cancer. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and tolerability of platinum versus non–platinum chem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Wei-Wei, Wang, Feng, Xu, Rui-Hua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3708886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23874831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068974
_version_ 1782276680552808448
author Chen, Wei-Wei
Wang, Feng
Xu, Rui-Hua
author_facet Chen, Wei-Wei
Wang, Feng
Xu, Rui-Hua
author_sort Chen, Wei-Wei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although the platinum regimen is adopted widely nowadays in spite of the excessive side effects, there is still no international standard for palliative chemotherapy of advanced gastric cancer. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and tolerability of platinum versus non–platinum chemotherapy as first-line palliative treatment in patients with inoperable, advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Randomized phase II and III clinical trials on first-line palliative chemotherapy in inoperable, advanced gastric cancer were identified by electronic searches of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register, and hand searches of relevant abstract books and reference lists. Response rates, overall survival, and toxicity were analyzed. Depending on whether new-generation agents (S-1, taxanes and irinotecan) were utilized, the non–platinum regimens were divided into two subgroup. RESULTS: Compared to non-platinum regimens containing new-generation agents, the use of platinum-based regimens was associated with better response (risk ratio (RR) = 1.94, 95%CI[1.48, 2.55], p<0.001), an increase of overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.85, 95%CI[0.78, 0.92], p<0.001), a higher risk of hematological and non-hematological toxicity. No statistically significant increase in response (RR = 1.03, 95%CI [0.85, 1.24], p = 0.76) or overall survival (HR = 1.07, 95%CI [0.88, 1.30], p = 0.49) was found when platinum therapies were compared to new-generation agent based combination regimens. The toxicity of platinum-based regimens was significantly higher for hematologic toxicity, nausea and vomiting, and neurotoxicity, but not for diarrhea and toxic death rate. CONCLUSION: New-generation agent based combination regimens achieved similar response rate and overall survival as platinum-based therapy that had generally higher side effects. S-1, taxanes and irinotecan seemed to be valid options for patients with inoperable, advanced gastric cancer as first-line chemotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3708886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37088862013-07-19 Platinum-Based Versus Non-Platinum-Based Chemotherapy as First Line Treatment of Inoperable, Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-Analysis Chen, Wei-Wei Wang, Feng Xu, Rui-Hua PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Although the platinum regimen is adopted widely nowadays in spite of the excessive side effects, there is still no international standard for palliative chemotherapy of advanced gastric cancer. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and tolerability of platinum versus non–platinum chemotherapy as first-line palliative treatment in patients with inoperable, advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Randomized phase II and III clinical trials on first-line palliative chemotherapy in inoperable, advanced gastric cancer were identified by electronic searches of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register, and hand searches of relevant abstract books and reference lists. Response rates, overall survival, and toxicity were analyzed. Depending on whether new-generation agents (S-1, taxanes and irinotecan) were utilized, the non–platinum regimens were divided into two subgroup. RESULTS: Compared to non-platinum regimens containing new-generation agents, the use of platinum-based regimens was associated with better response (risk ratio (RR) = 1.94, 95%CI[1.48, 2.55], p<0.001), an increase of overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.85, 95%CI[0.78, 0.92], p<0.001), a higher risk of hematological and non-hematological toxicity. No statistically significant increase in response (RR = 1.03, 95%CI [0.85, 1.24], p = 0.76) or overall survival (HR = 1.07, 95%CI [0.88, 1.30], p = 0.49) was found when platinum therapies were compared to new-generation agent based combination regimens. The toxicity of platinum-based regimens was significantly higher for hematologic toxicity, nausea and vomiting, and neurotoxicity, but not for diarrhea and toxic death rate. CONCLUSION: New-generation agent based combination regimens achieved similar response rate and overall survival as platinum-based therapy that had generally higher side effects. S-1, taxanes and irinotecan seemed to be valid options for patients with inoperable, advanced gastric cancer as first-line chemotherapy. Public Library of Science 2013-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3708886/ /pubmed/23874831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068974 Text en © 2013 Chen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Wei-Wei
Wang, Feng
Xu, Rui-Hua
Platinum-Based Versus Non-Platinum-Based Chemotherapy as First Line Treatment of Inoperable, Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
title Platinum-Based Versus Non-Platinum-Based Chemotherapy as First Line Treatment of Inoperable, Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Platinum-Based Versus Non-Platinum-Based Chemotherapy as First Line Treatment of Inoperable, Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Platinum-Based Versus Non-Platinum-Based Chemotherapy as First Line Treatment of Inoperable, Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Platinum-Based Versus Non-Platinum-Based Chemotherapy as First Line Treatment of Inoperable, Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Platinum-Based Versus Non-Platinum-Based Chemotherapy as First Line Treatment of Inoperable, Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort platinum-based versus non-platinum-based chemotherapy as first line treatment of inoperable, advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3708886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23874831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068974
work_keys_str_mv AT chenweiwei platinumbasedversusnonplatinumbasedchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentofinoperableadvancedgastricadenocarcinomaametaanalysis
AT wangfeng platinumbasedversusnonplatinumbasedchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentofinoperableadvancedgastricadenocarcinomaametaanalysis
AT xuruihua platinumbasedversusnonplatinumbasedchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentofinoperableadvancedgastricadenocarcinomaametaanalysis