Cargando…
Emotion and attention interaction: a trade-off between stimuli relevance, motivation and individual differences
Mounting evidence suggests that the neural processing of emotional stimuli is prioritized. However, whether the processing of emotional stimuli is dependent on attention remains debatable. Several studies have investigated this issue by testing the capacity of emotional distracters to divert process...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3709171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23874284 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00364 |
_version_ | 1782276720767795200 |
---|---|
author | Oliveira, Leticia Mocaiber, Izabela David, Isabel A. Erthal, Fátima Volchan, Eliane Pereira, Mirtes G. |
author_facet | Oliveira, Leticia Mocaiber, Izabela David, Isabel A. Erthal, Fátima Volchan, Eliane Pereira, Mirtes G. |
author_sort | Oliveira, Leticia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mounting evidence suggests that the neural processing of emotional stimuli is prioritized. However, whether the processing of emotional stimuli is dependent on attention remains debatable. Several studies have investigated this issue by testing the capacity of emotional distracters to divert processing resources from an attentional main task. The attentional load theory postulates that the perceptual load of the main task determines the selective processing of the distracter. Although we agree with this theory, we also suggest that other factors could be important in determining the association between the load of the main task and distracter processing, namely, (1) the relevance of the to-be ignored stimuli and (2) the engagement in the main task due to motivation. We postulate that these factors function as opposite forces to influence distracter processing. In addition, we propose that this trade-off is modulated by individual differences. In summary, we suggest that the relationship between emotion and attention is flexible rather than rigid and depends on several factors. Considering this perspective may help us to understand the divergence in the results described by several studies in this field. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3709171 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37091712013-07-19 Emotion and attention interaction: a trade-off between stimuli relevance, motivation and individual differences Oliveira, Leticia Mocaiber, Izabela David, Isabel A. Erthal, Fátima Volchan, Eliane Pereira, Mirtes G. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Mounting evidence suggests that the neural processing of emotional stimuli is prioritized. However, whether the processing of emotional stimuli is dependent on attention remains debatable. Several studies have investigated this issue by testing the capacity of emotional distracters to divert processing resources from an attentional main task. The attentional load theory postulates that the perceptual load of the main task determines the selective processing of the distracter. Although we agree with this theory, we also suggest that other factors could be important in determining the association between the load of the main task and distracter processing, namely, (1) the relevance of the to-be ignored stimuli and (2) the engagement in the main task due to motivation. We postulate that these factors function as opposite forces to influence distracter processing. In addition, we propose that this trade-off is modulated by individual differences. In summary, we suggest that the relationship between emotion and attention is flexible rather than rigid and depends on several factors. Considering this perspective may help us to understand the divergence in the results described by several studies in this field. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3709171/ /pubmed/23874284 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00364 Text en Copyright © 2013 Oliveira, Mocaiber, David, Erthal, Volchan and Pereira. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Oliveira, Leticia Mocaiber, Izabela David, Isabel A. Erthal, Fátima Volchan, Eliane Pereira, Mirtes G. Emotion and attention interaction: a trade-off between stimuli relevance, motivation and individual differences |
title | Emotion and attention interaction: a trade-off between stimuli relevance, motivation and individual differences |
title_full | Emotion and attention interaction: a trade-off between stimuli relevance, motivation and individual differences |
title_fullStr | Emotion and attention interaction: a trade-off between stimuli relevance, motivation and individual differences |
title_full_unstemmed | Emotion and attention interaction: a trade-off between stimuli relevance, motivation and individual differences |
title_short | Emotion and attention interaction: a trade-off between stimuli relevance, motivation and individual differences |
title_sort | emotion and attention interaction: a trade-off between stimuli relevance, motivation and individual differences |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3709171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23874284 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00364 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oliveiraleticia emotionandattentioninteractionatradeoffbetweenstimulirelevancemotivationandindividualdifferences AT mocaiberizabela emotionandattentioninteractionatradeoffbetweenstimulirelevancemotivationandindividualdifferences AT davidisabela emotionandattentioninteractionatradeoffbetweenstimulirelevancemotivationandindividualdifferences AT erthalfatima emotionandattentioninteractionatradeoffbetweenstimulirelevancemotivationandindividualdifferences AT volchaneliane emotionandattentioninteractionatradeoffbetweenstimulirelevancemotivationandindividualdifferences AT pereiramirtesg emotionandattentioninteractionatradeoffbetweenstimulirelevancemotivationandindividualdifferences |