Cargando…

Emotion and attention interaction: a trade-off between stimuli relevance, motivation and individual differences

Mounting evidence suggests that the neural processing of emotional stimuli is prioritized. However, whether the processing of emotional stimuli is dependent on attention remains debatable. Several studies have investigated this issue by testing the capacity of emotional distracters to divert process...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliveira, Leticia, Mocaiber, Izabela, David, Isabel A., Erthal, Fátima, Volchan, Eliane, Pereira, Mirtes G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3709171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23874284
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00364
_version_ 1782276720767795200
author Oliveira, Leticia
Mocaiber, Izabela
David, Isabel A.
Erthal, Fátima
Volchan, Eliane
Pereira, Mirtes G.
author_facet Oliveira, Leticia
Mocaiber, Izabela
David, Isabel A.
Erthal, Fátima
Volchan, Eliane
Pereira, Mirtes G.
author_sort Oliveira, Leticia
collection PubMed
description Mounting evidence suggests that the neural processing of emotional stimuli is prioritized. However, whether the processing of emotional stimuli is dependent on attention remains debatable. Several studies have investigated this issue by testing the capacity of emotional distracters to divert processing resources from an attentional main task. The attentional load theory postulates that the perceptual load of the main task determines the selective processing of the distracter. Although we agree with this theory, we also suggest that other factors could be important in determining the association between the load of the main task and distracter processing, namely, (1) the relevance of the to-be ignored stimuli and (2) the engagement in the main task due to motivation. We postulate that these factors function as opposite forces to influence distracter processing. In addition, we propose that this trade-off is modulated by individual differences. In summary, we suggest that the relationship between emotion and attention is flexible rather than rigid and depends on several factors. Considering this perspective may help us to understand the divergence in the results described by several studies in this field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3709171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37091712013-07-19 Emotion and attention interaction: a trade-off between stimuli relevance, motivation and individual differences Oliveira, Leticia Mocaiber, Izabela David, Isabel A. Erthal, Fátima Volchan, Eliane Pereira, Mirtes G. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Mounting evidence suggests that the neural processing of emotional stimuli is prioritized. However, whether the processing of emotional stimuli is dependent on attention remains debatable. Several studies have investigated this issue by testing the capacity of emotional distracters to divert processing resources from an attentional main task. The attentional load theory postulates that the perceptual load of the main task determines the selective processing of the distracter. Although we agree with this theory, we also suggest that other factors could be important in determining the association between the load of the main task and distracter processing, namely, (1) the relevance of the to-be ignored stimuli and (2) the engagement in the main task due to motivation. We postulate that these factors function as opposite forces to influence distracter processing. In addition, we propose that this trade-off is modulated by individual differences. In summary, we suggest that the relationship between emotion and attention is flexible rather than rigid and depends on several factors. Considering this perspective may help us to understand the divergence in the results described by several studies in this field. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3709171/ /pubmed/23874284 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00364 Text en Copyright © 2013 Oliveira, Mocaiber, David, Erthal, Volchan and Pereira. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Oliveira, Leticia
Mocaiber, Izabela
David, Isabel A.
Erthal, Fátima
Volchan, Eliane
Pereira, Mirtes G.
Emotion and attention interaction: a trade-off between stimuli relevance, motivation and individual differences
title Emotion and attention interaction: a trade-off between stimuli relevance, motivation and individual differences
title_full Emotion and attention interaction: a trade-off between stimuli relevance, motivation and individual differences
title_fullStr Emotion and attention interaction: a trade-off between stimuli relevance, motivation and individual differences
title_full_unstemmed Emotion and attention interaction: a trade-off between stimuli relevance, motivation and individual differences
title_short Emotion and attention interaction: a trade-off between stimuli relevance, motivation and individual differences
title_sort emotion and attention interaction: a trade-off between stimuli relevance, motivation and individual differences
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3709171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23874284
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00364
work_keys_str_mv AT oliveiraleticia emotionandattentioninteractionatradeoffbetweenstimulirelevancemotivationandindividualdifferences
AT mocaiberizabela emotionandattentioninteractionatradeoffbetweenstimulirelevancemotivationandindividualdifferences
AT davidisabela emotionandattentioninteractionatradeoffbetweenstimulirelevancemotivationandindividualdifferences
AT erthalfatima emotionandattentioninteractionatradeoffbetweenstimulirelevancemotivationandindividualdifferences
AT volchaneliane emotionandattentioninteractionatradeoffbetweenstimulirelevancemotivationandindividualdifferences
AT pereiramirtesg emotionandattentioninteractionatradeoffbetweenstimulirelevancemotivationandindividualdifferences